The diastereoselective and enantioselective substitution reactions of an isoindoline–borane complex

Abstract

The alkylation of N-methylisoindoline–borane complex, using ⁿBuLi in THF is diastereoselective, the substitution occurring predominantly syn to the borane group. Use of the ^sBuLi–sparteine reagent mixture in Et₂O changes the diastereoselectivity observed and enables the reaction to be conducted enantioselectively, giving the chiral isoindoline–borane complexes in up to 89% ee. The relative and absolute configurations of the chiral products were established by X-ray structure determinations and NMR studies. The new asymmetric process is shown to be an enantioselective deprotonation reaction, and the intermediate organolithium is shown to be epimerisable.

References

1. For reviews, see (a) S. V. Kessar and P. Singh, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 721; (b) B. Carboni and L. Monnier, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 1197.
2. M. R. Ebden, N. S. Simpkins and D. N. A. Fox, Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 12923.
3. E. Vedejs and J. T. Kendall, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 6941.
4. A. J. Blake, M. R. Ebden, D. N. A. Fox, W.-S. Li and N. S. Simpkins, Synlett, 1998, 189.
5. Lithiated N-formamidine tetrahydroisoquinoline derivatives are similarly configurationally unstable, see for example (a) A. I. Meyers, J. Guiles, J. S. Warmus and M. A. Gonzalez, Tetrahedron Lett., 1991, 32, 5505see also (b) R. E. Gawley and Q. Zhang, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 6077; (c) T. R. Elworthy and A. I. Meyers, Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 6089.
6. Sparteine is a very important ligand for asymmetric metallation, see for reviews (a) P. Beak, A. Basu, D. J. Gallagher, Y. S. Park and S. Thayumanavan, Acc. Chem. Res., 1996, 29, 552; (b) D. Hoppe and T. Hense, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 2282.
7. In our original communication diastereomer 4 was mistakenly reported as the major product from quenching with Me₃SiCl.
8. This argument relies on the transmetallation reaction of 5a proceeding with initial retention of configuration, which can usually be assumed, see for example P. Beak and A. I. Meyers, Acc. Chem. Res., 1986, 19, 356.
9. The very small quantities of the minor isomer 4b available in non-racemic form, combined with the small values of the apparent specific rotations resulted in the misassignment.
10. (a) D. R. Armstrong, W. Clegg, H. M. Colquhoun, J. A. Daniels, R. E. Mulvey, I. R. Stephenson and K. Wade, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1987, 630; (b) see also H. Nöth, S. Thomas and M. Schmidt, Chem. Ber., 1996, 129, 451.
11. (a) L. J. Beeley and C. J. M. Rockell, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 417; (b) A. I. Meyers and B. Santiago, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 5877; (c) R. E. Gawley, S. R. Chemburkar, A. L. Smith and T. V. Anklekar, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 5381.
12. J. K. Whitesell, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89, 1581.
13. H. D. Flack, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A, 1983, 39, 876.