Reactions of aldehydes with diethylzinc catalysed by polymer-supported ephedrine and camphor derivatives: comparisons of enantiomeric excesses achieved with various supports: optimisation of support parameters to enable high enantiomeric excesses to be obtained †

Abstract

The reactions of benzaldehyde with diethylzinc catalysed by PS ephedrine or camphor derivatives have been investigated in some depth in order to identify the crucial factors necessary to successfully prepare PS chiral catalysts for such reactions. The most important factor is found to be a favourable interaction of the polymer matrix with the reaction solvent so that the polymer will dissolve or swell to allow the other reactants easy access to the catalytic sites. Accordingly toluene is a better reaction solvent than hexane. The ephedrine-derived catalytic groups reduce the solubility of the linear polymers in toluene and, almost certainly, the swelling properties of the crosslinked polymers. Thus, of the polymers investigated the better linear ones had <ca. 1.5 mmol per g of catalyst sites and the better insoluble ones were 1% crosslinked gels with <ca. 1.0 mmol per g of catalyst sites. Site–site interactions and microenvironmental effects do not appear to play a major role in these PS reaction systems. For the reaction of benzaldehyde with diethylzinc, using the best linear PS ephedrine derivatives 10f, 10g or 11e affords 1-phenylpropanol (1) with 83–88% enantiomeric excesses (ee)s of the (R)-enantiomer; using the best linear PS camphor derivative 21 affords the alcohol 1 with a 98% ee of the (S)-enantiomer; using the best crosslinked PS ephedrine derivative 12a affords the alcohol 1 with a 78–81% ee and using the best crosslinked PS camphor derivative 22 affords alcohol 1 with a 97% ee of the (S)-enantiomer. These values are close to those obtained using analogues of non-polymeric catalysts under similar reaction conditions.

References

1. R. B. Merrifield, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1963, 85, 2149.
2. Polymer-supported Reactions in Organic Synthesis, eds. P. Hodge and D. C. Sherrington, John Wiley, Chichester, 1980.
3. Polymeric Reagents and Catalysts, ed. W. T. Ford, ACS Symposium Series 308, Washington, 1986.
4. Syntheses and Separations Using Functional Polymers, eds. D. C. Sherrington and P. Hodge, John Wiley, Chichester, 1988.
5. A. Akelah and A. Moet, Functionalised Polymers and Their Applications, Chapman and Hall, London, 1990.
6. A. Akelah and D. C. Sherrington, Chem, Rev., 1981, 81, 557.
7. A. Akelah and D. C. Sherrington, Polymer, 1983, 24, 1369.
8. P. Hodge, Annu. Rep. Prog. Chem., Sect. B, Org. Chem., 1986, 283.
9. P. Hodge, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1997, 26, 417.
10. C. Dreisbach, G. Wischnewski, U. Kragl and C. Wandrey, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1995, 875.
11. P. Hodge, in Innovation and Perspectives in Solid Phase Synthesis, ed. R. Epton, SPCC (UK) Ltd., Birmingham, 1990, pp. 273–292.
12. R. Noyori, Asymmetric Catalysis in Organic Synthesis, John Wiley, New York, 1994.
13. G. Liu and J. A. Ellman, J. Org. Chem., 1995, 60, 7712.
14. S. R. Gilbertson and X. Wang, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 6475.
15. B. M. Cole, K. D. Shimizu, C. A. Krueger, J. P. A. Harrity, M. L. Snapper and A. H. Horveyda, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 1668.
16. S. Itsuno and J. M. J. Frechet, J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52, 4140.
17. K. Soai, S. Niwa and M. Watanabe, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 927.
18. K. Soai, S. Niwa and M. Watanabe, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1989, 109.
19. K. Soai and M. Watanabe, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1990, 43.
20. S. Itsuno, Y. Sakurai, K. Ito, T. Maruyama, S. Nakahama and J. M. J. Frechet, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 304.
21. M. Watanabe, S. Araki, Y. Butsugan and M. Uemura, Chem. Express, 1990, 5, 761.
22. Z. Zhang, P. Hodge and P. W. Stratford, React. Polym., 1991, 15, 71.
23. M. Watanabe and K. Soai, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1994, 837.
24. D. Seebach, R. E. Marti and T. Hintermann, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1996, 79, 1710.
25. K. Soai and S. Niwa, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 833.
26. K. Soai, M. Watanabe and A. Yamamoto, J. Org. Chem., 1990, 55, 4832.
27. K. Burgess and D. Lim, Chem. Commun., 1997, 785.
28. L. Canali, E. Cowan, H. Deleuze, C. L. Gibson and D. C. Sherrington, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2561.
29. M. Kitamura, S. Okada, S. Suga and R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 4028.
30. R. Noyori and M. Kitamura, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 49.
31. G. E. Coates and D. Ridley, J. Chem. Soc. (A), 1966, 1064.
32. P. A. Chaloner and E. Langadianou, Tetrahedron Lett., 1990, 31, 5185.
33. N. Oguni and T. Omi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1984, 25, 2823.
34. A. H. Alberts and H. Wynberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 7264.
35. D. J. Gravert and D. K. Janda, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 489.
36. F. Villedon-Denaide, P. Lecavalier and J. M. J. Frechet, Polym. Bull., 1986, 15, 491.
37. B. Marx, E. Henry-Basch and P. Freon, C. R. Seances Acad. Sci., Ser. C., 1967, 264, 1967.
38. D. C. Sherrington, Chem. Commun., 1998, 2275.
39. N. R. Cameron and D. C. Sherrington, Adv. Pol. Sci., 1996, 126, 163.
40. M. Kitamura, S. Suga, K. Kawai and R. Noyori, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 6071.
41. R. Noyori, S. Suga, K. Kawai, S. Okada, M. Kitamura, N. Oguni, M. Hayashi, T. Kaneko and Y. Matsuda, J. Organomet. Chem, 1990, 382, 19.
42. R. H. Pickard and J. Kenyon, J. Chem. Soc., 1914, 1115.
43. J. Capillon and J. Guétte, Tetrahedron, 1979, 35, 1817.
44. A. A. Smaardijk and H. Wynberg, J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52, 135.
45. M. P. Bonner and E. R. Thornton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 1299.
46. R. M. Chittenden and G. H. Cooper, J. Chem. Soc (C), 1970, 49.