Synthesis and photoelectrochemical properties of a fullerene–azothiophene dyad

Abstract

In this paper we describe the synthesis, electrochemistry and photophysical behavior of a fullerene-based donor–acceptor dyad (2) in which the donor unit is an azothiophene dye. Dyad 2, prepared in one step starting from C₆₀, commercially available N-methylglycine and thienylazobenzeneamine 1, can be selectively excited in the visible region where the dye has an absorption maximum at 567 nm. Implementation of electrochemical and photophysical data reveals that both intramolecular energy- and electron-transfer are thermodynamically feasible processes. Steady-state luminescence of dyad 2 in CH₂Cl₂ shows a quenching of the dye singlet excited state (¹dye*) and evidence of the fullerene singlet excited state (¹C₆₀*) emission. Flash-photolytic experiments, on the other hand, exhibit characteristic differential absorption changes attributed to the C₆₀^·––dye^·+ charge-separated state. Interestingly, it has been estimated that the energy difference between ¹C₆₀* and the charge separated state is very small, leading to the hypothesis that a rapid exchange between the two states occurs. Sensitization of TiO₂ with dyad 2 and model compound 3 is also reported and discussed.

References

1. Fullerenes and Related Structures, Ed. A. Hirsch, Series: Topics in Current Chemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1998, Vol. 199.
2. A. W. Jensen, S. R. Wilson and D. I. Schuster, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 1996, 4, 767.
3. M. Prato, J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7, 1097.
4. C. S. Foote, Top. Curr. Chem., 1994, 169, 347.
5. (a) H. Imahori and Y. Sakata, Adv. Mater., 1997, 9, 537; (b) N. Martin, L. Sanchez, B. Illescas and I. Perez, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 2527; (c) J. F. Nierengarten, C. Schall and J. F. Nicoud, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1998, 37, 1934; (d) M. Maggini, D. M. Guldi, S. Mondini, G. Scorrano, F. Paolucci, P. Ceroni and S. Roffia, Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4, 1992; (e) E. Dietel, A. Hirsch, E. Eichhorn, A. Rieker, S. Hackbarth and B. Roder, Chem. Commun., 1998, 21, 1981; (f) D. M. Guldi, G. Torres Garcia and J. Mattay, J. Phys. Chem., 1998, 102, 9679; (g) S. Higashida, H. Imahori, T. Kaneda and Y. Sakata, Chem. Lett., 1998, 7, 605; (h) K. Tamaki, H. Imahori, Y. Nishimura, I. Yamazaki and Y. Sakata, Chem. Commun., 1999, 7, 625; (i) K. Tamaki, H. Imahori, Y. Nishimura, I. Yamazaki, A. Shimomura, T. Okada and Y. Sakata, Chem. Lett., 1999, 3, 227; (j) J. F. Nierengarten, J. F. Eckert, J. F. Nicoud, L. Ouali, V. Krasnikov and G. Hadziioannou, Chem. Commun., 1999, 7, 617; (k) N. Armaroli, F. Diederich, L. Echegoyen, T. Habicher, L. Flamigni, G. Marconi and J. F. Nierengarten, New J. Chem., 1999, 23, 77; (l) A. Polese, S. Mondini, A. Bianco, C. Toniolo, G. Scorrano, D. M. Guldi and M. Maggini, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 3446; (m) P. Cheng, S. R. Wilson and D. I. Schuster, Chem. Commun., 1999, 7, 89; (n) T. Da-Ros, M. Prato, D. Guldi, E. Alessio, M. Ruzzi and L. Pasimeni, Chem. Commun., 1999, 7, 635; (o) S.-J. Liu, L. Shu, J. Rivera, H. Liu, J.-M. Raimundo, J. Roncali, A. Gorgues and L. Echegoyen, J. Org. Chem., 1999, 64, 4884.
6. N. S. Sariciftci, L. Smilowitz, A. J. Heeger and F. Wudl, Science, 1992, 258, 1474.
7. The azothiophene chromophore was used, instead of the more conventional azobenzenes, mainly because aldehyde 1, precursor to fulleropyrrolidine 2, was readily available from BASF-AG (see Experimental section).
8. A. Hagfeldt and M. Grätzel, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 49.
9. P. Bonhôte, J.-E. Moser, R. Humphry-Baker, N. Vlachopoulos, S. M. Zakeeruddin, L. Walder and M. Grätzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 1324.
10. C. Luo, C. Huang, L. Gan, D. Zhou, W. Xia, Q. Zhuang, Y. Zhao and Y. Huang, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 16 685.
11. G. Franco, J. Gehring, L. M. Peter, E. A. Ponomarev and I. Uhlendorf, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1999, 103, 692.
12. A. Bianco, M. Maggini, G. Scorrano, C. Toniolo, G. Marconi, C. Villani and M. Prato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 4072.
13. D. Guldi, M. Maggini, G. Scorrano and M. Prato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 974.
14. M. Maggini, G. Scorrano and M. Prato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 9798.
15. M. K. Nazeeruddin, A. Kay, I. Rodicio, R. Humphry-Baker, E. Müller, P. Liska, N. Vlachopoulos and M. Grätzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 6382.
16. J. C. Hummelen, B. Knight, J. Pavlovich, R. Gonzalez and F. Wudl, Science, 1995, 269, 1554.
17. E. L. Yee, R. J. Cave, K. L. Guyer, P. D. Tyma and M. J. Weaver, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 1131.
18. N. Vlachopoulos, P. Liska, J. Augunstinski and M. Grätzel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 1216.
19. M. Prato and M. Maggini, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 519.
20. This assignment stems primarily from i) the larger potential separation between peak IV and its anodic counterpart relative to peaks I–III (230 mV vs. 90 mV) and V–VI, and ii) the analysis of peak IV characteristics upon variation of the scan rate (up to a scan rate of 100 V s^–1).
21. J. P. Stradins and V. T. Glezer, in Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry of the Elements, Organic Section, Ed. A. J. Bard and H. Lund, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1979, Vol. XIII, p. 163.
22. J. Roncali, Chem. Rev., 1992, 92, 711.
23. M. G. Hutchings, P. Gregory, J. S. Campbell, A. Strong, J.-P. Zamy, A. Lepre and A. Mills, Chem. Eur. J., 1997, 3, 1719.
24. The azobenzene moiety is known to undergo trans–cis isomerization. However, for the dye 3 no photochemical reaction was observed upon excitation both in the visible and in the UV spectral region.
25. The fluorescence spectrum of 2 at 77 K shows both the dye- and the fullerene-based emission.
26. The energy of the CS state (ΔG⁰_CS) in CH₂Cl₂ was estimated using the dielectric continuum model. This model accounts for two spherical ions with radii R_A(C₆₀) and R_D(dye) separated by a distance R_DA immersed in a dielectric continuum with relative permittivity ε(ε_{dichloromethane}= 8.93). The center-to-center distance R_DA= 11.8 Å was obtained from PM3 semiempirical calculations. The standard potentials for oxidation [dye⁺/dye] and reduction (C₆₀/C₆₀^–) processes in CH₂Cl₂, reported in Table 1 and E_0-0 value of 1.97 eV relative to ¹dye* state were used in the calculations. (a) A. Z. Weller, Phys. Chem. (Wiesbaden), 1982, 93, 1982; (b) H. Imahori, K. Hagiwara, M. Aoki, T. Akiyama, S. Taniguchi, T. Okada, M. Shirakawa and Y. Sakata, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 11 771; (c) S. I. van Dijk, C. P. Groen, F. Hartl, A. Brouwer and J. W. Verhoeven, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 8425.
27. The spectral features of the charge-separated radical pair and the lifetime of the latter resembled those observed upon the dye excitation (535 nm).
28. Analogously, radiation-induced reduction of dyad 2 in toluene–propan-2-ol–acetone solution resulted in a distinct NIR absorption at 1010 nm.
29. Q. Xie, F. Arias and L. Echegoyen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 9818.
30. A. Wahl, M. Ulmann, A. Carroy, B. Jermann, M. Dolata, P. Kedzierzawski, C. Chatelain, A. Monnier and J. Augusynsky, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1995, 396, 41.
31. R. Dabestani, A. J. Bard, A. Campion, M. A. Fox, T. E. Mallouk, S. E. Webber and J. M. White, J. Phys. Chem., 1988, 92, 1872.
32. G. K. Boschloo and A. Goossens, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 19 489.