A Monte Carlo analysis of spin dynamics and Mössbauer relaxation in 2-D magnetically diluted iron oxides

Abstract

The spin dynamics of two-dimensional magnetically diluted iron oxides with the K₂NiF₄ structure has been studied by a Monte Carlo analysis using a simple Ising model. Below the critical temperature, antiferromagnetic domains are formed in which the domain walls are ‘pinned’ by the non-magnetic atoms such that increasing dilution causes substantial interpenetration of the domains. The magnetic hysteresis observed in field-cooled and zero-field-cooled magnetic measurements on SrLaFeO₄ diluted with a non-magnetic cation can be explained. Similarly, the observed Mössbauer relaxation can be simulated, and derives from differing relaxation rates for spins with few near neighbour spins, particularly those close to a domain boundary. The existence of ‘spin clusters’ which has often been assumed is not a good model. It is suggested that Ising-like behaviour in the critical region is an important aspect of these diluted Heisenberg layered systems.

References

1. R. Rodríguez, A. Fernández, A. Isalgué, J. Rodriguez, A. Labarta, T. Tejada and X. Obradors, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 1985, 18, L401.
2. P. D. Battle, T. C. Gibb, C. W. Jones and F. Studer, J. Solid State Chem., 1989, 78, 281.
3. T. C. Gibb, J. Mater. Chem., 1992, 2, 415.
4. T. C. Gibb and R. J. Whitehead, J. Mater. Chem., 1993, 3, 591.
5. T. C. Gibb, A. J. Herod, S. J. Lees and P. D. Battle, J. Mater. Chem., 1995, 5, 285.
6. Y. Ishikawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 1962, 17, 1835, 1877.
7. M. Schlenker, J. Baruchel and Y. Souche, New trends in magnetism, magnetic materials, and their applications, eds. J. L. Morán-López and J. M. Sanchez, Plenum Press, New York, 1994, p. 307.
8. H. Gould and J. Tobochnik, An Introduction to Computer Simulation Methods, 2nd edn., Addison Wesley, London, 1996.
9. A. R. Bortz, M. H. Kalos and J. L. Lebowitz, J. Comput. Phys., 1975, 17, 10.
10. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory, 2nd edn., Taylor and Francis, London, 1991.
11. G. J. Grest and D. J. Srolovitz, Phys. Rev. B, 1985, 32, 3014.
12. G. J. Grest, C. M. Soukoulis and K. Levein, Phys. Rev. B, 1986, 33, 7659.
13. U. Nowak and K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. B, 1989, 39, 2516.
14. U. Nowak and K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. B, 1991, 44, 7426.
15. U. Nowak and K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. B, 1991, 43, 851.
16. U. Nowak and K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. B, 1992, 46, 8329.
17. J. Esser, U. Nowak and K. D. Usadel, Phys. Rev. B, 1997, 55, 5866.
18. M. Staats, U. Nowak and K. D. Usadel, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 1998, 177–181, 85.
19. L. J. de Jongh and A. R. Meidema, Adv. Phys., 1974, 23, 1.
20. M. E. Lines, J. Appl. Phys., 1969, 40, 1352.
21. J. L. Soubeyroux, P. Courbin, L. Fournes, D. Fruchart and G. Le Flem, J. Solid State Chem., 1980, 31, 313.
22. M. Shimada, M. Koizumi, M. Takano, T. Shinjo and M. Takada, J. Phys., Colloq. C2, 1979, 40, C2–272.
23. C. Dekker, A. F. M. Arts, H. W. de Wijn and J. K. Kjens, Phys. Rev., 1987, 35, 7157.
24. R. A. Cowley, G. Shirane, R. J. Birgenau and H. J. Guggenheim, Phys. Rev. B, 1977, 15, 4292.
25. R. J. Birgenau, R. A. Cowley, G. Shirane, J. A. Tarvin and H. J. Guggenheim, Phys. Rev. B, 1980, 21, 317.
26. H. Keller and I. M. Savie, Phys. Rev. B, 1983, 28, 2638.
27. B. J. Dikken, A. F. M. Arts, H. W. de Wijn, W. A. H. M. Vlakand and E. Frikkee, Phys. Rev. B, 1985, 32, 5600.