An NMR study of chain transfer to diols containing both primary and secondary hydroxy groups in the polymerization of ε-caprolactone

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Alexander Kavros, Thomas N. Huckerby and Stephen Rimmer


Abstract

ε-Caprolactone has been polymerized in the presence of various diols, viz. propane-1,2-diol (PD), butane-1,3-diol (BD) and hexane-1,5-diol (HD). 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy were used to evaluate the structures. The final products were found to be a function of the diol used. It was shown that reactions incorporating PD gave low conversions and/or low degrees of polymerizations when compared with those involving BD or HD. In polymerizations involving BD two 13C resonances could be seen in the carbonyl region, assignable to the ester carbonyls adjacent to the oxymethine and oxymethylene groups derived from the residues of the diol units. Thus, both primary and secondary hydroxy groups were shown to be active in the transfer reaction. Selective decoupling was used to assign the down-field resonance to the carbonyl adjacent to oxymethylene and the up-field resonance to the carbonyl adjacent to oxymethine. However, in the case of the polymerization incorporating BD, approximately 10% of end groups were shown to be secondary alcohols, which are derived from the secondary hydroxy group of BD that does not transfer. In polymerizations involving HD only one carbonyl resonance, which could be assigned to an ester adjacent to the diol residue, was observed. From COSY spectra it was possible to assign a peak due to the ester of the secondary hydroxy. The fraction of secondary chain ends was thus observed to be greater, at ca. 13%, than in the BD polymerizations.


References

  1. H. R. Kricheldorf, M. Berl and N. Scharnagl, Macromolecules, 1988, 21, 286 CrossRef CAS.
  2. H. R. Kricheldorf, M. V. Sumbal and I. Kreiser-Saunders, Macromolecules, 1991, 24, 1944 CrossRef CAS.
  3. H. R. Kricheldorf and S.-R. Lee, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 8689 CrossRef CAS.
  4. D. Tian, Ph. Dubois and R. Jerome, Macromolecules, 1996, 30, 1947 CrossRef.
  5. A. Duda and S. Penczek, Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 5981 CrossRef CAS.
  6. S. Penczek and A. Duda, Macromol. Symp., 1996, 107, 1 CAS.
  7. J. Baran, A. Duda, A. Kowalski, R. Szymamski and S. Penczek, Macromol. Symp., 199, 123, 93 Search PubMed.
  8. J. Baran, A. Duda, A. Kowalski, R. Szymamski and S. Penczek, Macromol. Rapid Commun., 1997, 18, 325 CrossRef CAS.
  9. W. M. Stevels, M. J. K. Ankone, P. J. Dijkstra and J. Feijen, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 8296 CrossRef CAS.
  10. Y. Shen, Z. Shen, Y. Zhang and K. Yao, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 8289 CrossRef CAS.
  11. Y. Shen, Z. Shen, Y. Zhang and K. Yao, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 3441 CrossRef CAS.
  12. A. Duda, Macromolecules, 1994, 27, 576 CrossRef CAS.
  13. Examples of patents include: UK 859 640; UK 859 642; UK 859 643; UK 859 644; UK 859 645 (all 1961).
  14. S. Rimmer and M. H. George, Eur. Polym. J., 1993, 29, 205 CAS.
  15. R. F. Storey and A. E. Taylor, J. Macromol. Sci., 1996, A33, 77 Search PubMed.
  16. F. Delaglio, S. Grzesiek, G. Vuister, G. Zhu, J. Pfeifer and A. Bax, J. Biomol. NMR, 1995, 6, 277 CrossRef CAS.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.