Electronic structures and instabilities of ZrNCl and HfNCl: implications for superconductivity in the doped compounds

Abstract

Amongst the many rules of thumb that prevail in the search for new superconductors is a belief that square nets of metal atoms are crucial to the achievement of high transition temperatures. The recent finding of superconductivity below 26 K in some intercalated β-HfNCl phases suggests that high transition temperatures might be achievable in compounds with triangular or graphite-like nets as well. Here we present key features of high level ab initio band structure calculations on the insulating ZrNCl and HfNCl parent compounds. Electron doping through intercalation has been modeled within a rigid-band framework. Features in the energy isosurfaces of the ‘doped’ compounds are examined for nesting instabilities of the kind that have been implicated in the superconducting properties of high-T_c compounds with square nets. Despite very different electron counts, bonding patterns and atom topologies, it would seem that certain important aspects of the Fermi surfaces of the superconducting Zr(Hf)NCl phases are in many respects very similar to the Fermi surfaces of the cuprate high-T_c superconductors.

References

1. J. Labbé and J. Friedel, J. Phys. (Paris), 1966, 27, 153.
2. J. Labbé and J. Bok, Europhys. Lett., 1987, 3, 1225.
3. D. M. Newns, H. R. Krishnamurthy, P. C. Pattnaik, C. C. Tsuei and C. C. Chi, Physica B, 1993, 186, 801.
4. C. Felser, J. Alloys Compd., 1997, 61, 87.
5. C. Felser, S. Cramm, D. Johrendt, A. Mewis, O. Jepsen, G. Hohlneicher, W. Eberhardt and O. K. Andersen, Europhys. Lett., 1997, 40, 85.
6. C. Felser, R. Seshadri, A. Leist and W. Tremel, J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 787.
7. C. Felser, P. Deniard, M. Bäcker, T. Ohm, J. Rouxel and A. Simon, J. Mater. Chem., 1998, 8, 1295.
8. M. J. Geselbracht, T. J. Richardson and A. M. Stacey, Nature, 1990, 345, 6273.
9. D. L. Novikov, V. A. Gubanov and V. G. Zubkov, Phys. Rev. B, 1994, 49, 15830.
10. R. Seshadri, C. Felser, K. Thieme and W. Tremel, Chem. Mater., 1998, 10, 2189.
11. S. Yamanaka, H. Kawaji, K. Hotehama and M. Ohashi, Adv. Mater., 1996, 9, 771.
12. H. Kawaji, K. Hotehama and S. Yamanaka, Chem. Mater., 1997, 9, 2127.
13. S. Yamanaka, K. Hotehama and H. Kawaji, Nature, 1998, 392, 580.
14. O. Jepsen and O. K. Andersen, Z. Phys. B, 1995, 97, 35.
15. C. Felser, K. Thieme and R. Seshadri, J. Mater. Chem., in press.
16. P. M. Woodward and T. Vogt, J. Solid State Chem., 1998, 138, 207.
17. R. Juza and H. Friedrichsen, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1966, 622, 123.
18. F. Lissner and T. Schleid, Poster presented at the DFG Solid State Chemistry Symposium, Saarbrücken, Germany, 1998.
19. H. L. Skriver, The LMTO method, Springer, Berlin, 1984.
20. O. K. Andersen and O. Jepsen, et al., The Stuttgart TB-LMTO-ASA Program version 47, MPI für Festkörperforschung, Stuttgart, Germany, 1996.
21. C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell, The mathematical theory of symmetry in solids, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972.
22. F. Boucher, O. Jepsen and O. K. Andersen, unpublished results.
23. S. Wijeyesekera and R. Hoffmann, Organometallics, 1984, 3, 949.
24. A. Simon, A. Yoshiasa, M. Bäcker, R. W. Henn, C. Felser, R. K. Kremer and Hj. Mattausch, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1996, 622, 123.
25. Y. Tian and T. Hughbanks, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 400; K. A. Yee and T. Hughbanks, Inorg. Chem., 1991, 30, 2321.