Comparative study of the excitation/ionization capacity of direct current versus radiofrequency powered glow discharge optical spectrometry

Abstract

A comparison of the excitation ability of radiofrequency (rf) and direct current (dc) powering modes in glow discharge (GD) optical emission spectrometry, using the same discharge chamber based on the Marcus design, is presented. Three cathodes of pure Sn, Zn and Cu were used to investigate the behaviour of atomic and ionic emission lines of these analytes and the discharge gas (argon) under different operating conditions in the 200-500 nm region. At a given pressure it was observed that atomic line intensity ratios between rf- and dc-GD for Ar I emission lines were higher the higher the upper level energy of the transition, whereas such ratios were independent of the energy of the upper level for Ar II lines. Considering the excitation of analyte emission lines, at selected operating conditions of the discharges, it was observed that lower intensities with the rf powering were due to lower sputtering rates because the emission yields were higher for the rf mode. The effect of pressure was also studied and it was found that the behaviour followed by both the atomic and ionic emission lines of argon, as well as the analytical line intensities, was not apparently related to the energy of the upper level of the transitions.

References

1. Spectrochemical Analysis Through Glow Discharge Spectroscopies, ed. R. K. Marcus, Plenum, New York, 1993.
2. K. R. Hess and R. K. Marcus, Spectroscopy, 1987, 2, 24.
3. K. Ohls, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem., 1987, 327, 111.
4. K. Wagatsuma and K. Hirokawa, Anal. Chem., 1984, 56, 412.
5. B. W. Smith, N. Omenetto and J. D. Winefordner, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1974, 29, 1389.
6. W. W. Harrison, K. R. Hess, R. K. Marcus and F. L. King, Anal. Chem., 1986, 58, 341A.
7. R. Payling, D. G. Jones and S. A. Gower, Surf. Interface Anal., 1993, 20, 959.
8. F. Prässler, V. Hoffmann, J. Schumann and K. Wetzig, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1995, 10, 677.
9. S. De Gendt, R. Van Grieken, W. Hang and W. W. Harrison, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1995, 10, 689.
10. W. B. Cho, Y. A. Woo, H. J. Kim, I. J. Kim and W. K. Kang, Appl. Spectrosc., 1997, 51, 1060.
11. R. K. Marcus, T. R. Harville, Y. Mei and C. R. Shick, Jr., Anal. Chem., 1994, 66, 902A.
12. R. K. Marcus, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1994, 9, 1029.
13. P. Sigmund, Sputtering by Particle Bombardment I, Springer, Berlin, 1981, ch. 2.
14. N. Laegreid and G. K. Wehner, J. Appl. Phys., 1961, 32, 365.
15. H. Oechsner, Appl. Phys., 1975, 8, 185.
16. A. Bogaerts and R. Gijbels, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1998, 53, 1.
17. R. K. Marcus, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1993, 8, 935.
18. C. Pérez, R. Pereiro, N. Bordel and A. Sanz-Medel, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1998, 53, 1541.
19. D. C. Duckworth and R. K. Marcus, Anal. Chem., 1989, 61, 1879.
20. B. N. Chapman, Glow Discharge Processes, Wiley, New York, 1980.
21. M. R. Winchester, C. Lazik and R. K. Marcus, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1991, 46, 483.
22. K. Wagatsuma and K. Hirokawa, Anal. Chem., 1985, 57, 2901.
23. K. Wagatsuma and K. Hirokawa, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1995, 50, 109.
24. S. Bashkin and J. O. Stoner Jr., Atomic Energy Level and Grotrian Diagrams, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978, vol. 2.
25. A. R. Striganov and N. S. Sventitskii, Tables of Spectral Lines of Neutral and Ionized Atoms, IFI/Plenum, New York, 1968.
26. D. Pollmann, K. Ingeneri and W. W. Harrison, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1996, 11, 849.
27. X. Pan, B. Hu, Y. Ye and R. K. Marcus, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1998, 13, 1159.
28. C. E. Moore, National Bureau of Standards, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1949, Circular No. 467.
29. O. P. Bochkova and E. Y. Schreyder, Spectroscopic Analysis of Gas Mixtures, Academic Press, New York, 1965.
30. R. L. Smith, D. Serxner and K. R. Hess, Anal. Chem., 1989, 61, 1103.
31. C. Lazik and R. K. Marcus, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1994, 49, 649.
32. P. W. J. M. Boumans, Anal. Chem., 1972, 44, 1219.