Stability of inorganic arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) in water samples

Abstract

The objective of this study was to formulate a protocol for the collection and preservation of natural water samples (lakes and streams) to be analysed for the inorganic species As(III) and As(V). The analytical technique employed was HPLC-ICP-MS, using a proprietary anion exchange resin (ANX-1606-AS from Cetac) as the basis for separation of the two species. Initial experiments carried out at room temperature, where de-ionised water and Ottawa River water samples were spiked at low (0.5-20) µg l^–1 concentrations of As(III) and As(V), demonstrated that As(V) is actually reduced to As(III) within a few days. This reduction is matrix and concentration dependent and was confirmed by independent analysis using HGAAS with hydride generation at pH 4.5 and <1. Such conversion of As(V) to As(III) does not occur in spiked deionised water maintained at 5 °C but is evident in the Ottawa River sample at this temperature. A time and temperature study of a filtered (0.45 µm) natural water sample, with a total As concentration of 21 µg l^–1, showed that immediate storage in a filled bottle at about 5 °C will preserve As (III) and As(V) concentrations for about 30 d. If kept at room temperature, changes for this particular sample occur after about 5 d, with As(V) becoming the dominant species via oxidation and gradually declining thereafter. Although acidification to 0.1% HNO₃ stabilises the As species for at least 15 d at 22 °C, its effect is immediately to alter the species distribution. With the natural water sample, this effect was to increase the concentration of As(III) substantially and, to a lesser extent, that of As(V), at the expense of other forms of the element. Acidification to 0.1% HCl also produced these results. The study of spiked de-ionised water and Ottawa River samples at 0.1 and 0.4% in HNO₃ and HCl demonstrated that both acids cause the oxidation of As(III) to As(V) but HNO₃ showed a higher degree of oxidation with greater acid strength, as expected.

References

1. Y. M. Liu, M. L. F. Sanchez, E. B. Gonzalez and A. Sanz-Medel, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1993, 8, 815.
2. P. Thomas and K. Sniatecki, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1995, 10, 615.
3. M. L. Magnuson, J. T. Creed and C. A. Brockhoff, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1996, 11, 893.
4. F.-H. Ko, S.-L. Chen and M.-H. Yang, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1997, 12, 589.
5. P. Thomas, K. Pereira and D. Koller, Analusis, 1997, 25, 19.
6. R. K. Anderson, M. Thompson and E. Culbard, Analyst, 1986, 111, 1143.
7. R. K. Anderson, M. Thompson and E. Culbard, Analyst, 1986, 111, 1153.
8. R. E. Sturgeon, K. W. M. Siu, S. N. Willie and S. S. Berman, Analyst, 1989, 114, 1393.
9. H. Hasegawa, Y. Sohrin, M. Matsui, M. Hojo and M. Kawashima, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66, 3247.
10. J. Aggett and A. C. Aspell, Analyst, 1976, 101, 341.
11. G. E. M. Aslin, J. Geochem. Explor., 1976, 6, 321.
12. C. Feldman, Anal. Chem., 1979, 51, 664.
13. J. A. Cherry, A. U. Shaikh, D. E. Tallman and R. V. Nicholson, J. Hydrol., 1979, 43, 373.
14. V. Cheam and H. Agemian, Analyst, 1980, 105, 1253.
15. J. Aggett and M. R. Kriegman, Analyst, 1987, 112, 153.
16. R. Turner, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1981, 15, 1062.
17. M. J. Powell, D. W. Boomer and D. R. Wiederin, Anal. Chem., 1995, 67, 2474.
18. G. E. M. Hall, A. I. MacLaurin, J. C. Pelchat and G. Gauthier, Chem. Geol., 1997, 137, 79.
19. M. L. Peterson and R. Carpenter, Mar. Chem., 1983, 12, 295.
20. J. G. Sanders, Mar. Chem., 1985, 17, 329.
21. F. V. Vidal and V. M. V. Vidal, Mar. Biol., 1980, 60, 1.