View PDF Version
 
DOI: 10.1039/A807433J (Paper) Reference Section for: J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1999, 14, 381-386

Standardless semi-quantitative analysis with WDS-EPMA

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Cécile Fournier, Claude Merlet, Olivier Dugne and Michel Fialin

Abstract

A standardless semi-quantitative method for wavelength dispersive spectrometry (WDS) electron probe microbeam analysis was developed with a view to simplifying the analytical procedure required with this apparatus. Based on spectrum acquisition, this method is a way to obtain the sample composition in a short time with the advantages of the WDS system and maintaining reasonable accuracy. To this end, three specific algorithms were designed. The first algorithm was constructed to find automatically all the elements present in the sample and to select the appropriate X-ray line for each element. It needs to index automatically, with a good confidence level, all the peaks which are detected. The second was constructed to convert the X-ray peak area from the measured spectrum into X-ray peak intensity (normally used in WDS procedures) with a Gaussian function which is governed both by the characteristics of the crystal and by the X-ray line itself. This is essential to prevent any underestimation of the concentration due to the measurement of truncated peaks related to low sampling frequencies, and to improve the counting statistics by using all the information given by the spectrum. Finally, the sample composition was obtained with the calculation of the absolute intensity of the selected line which takes into account the spectrometer efficiency.

References

  1. R. A. Barrea and R. T. Mainardi, X-Ray Spectrom., 1998, 27, 111 CAS.
  2. V. D. Scott, G. Love and S. J. B. Reed, Quantitative Electron Probe Microanalysis, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 2nd edn., 1995 Search PubMed.
  3. R. Weast(Ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 76th edn., 1996 Search PubMed.
  4. H. Bethe, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 1930, 5, 325 Search PubMed.
  5. C. J. Powell, in Microbeam Analysis, ed. J. R. Michael and P. Ingram, San Francisco Press, San Francisco, USA, 1990, p. 13 Search PubMed.
  6. W. Bambynek, in X-84 Proceedings on X-Ray and Inner-Shell Processes in Atoms, Molecules and Solids, Liepzig, ed. A. Neisel and T. Münzer, 1984, p. 1 Search PubMed.
  7. J. H. Hubbell, P. N. Trehan, N. Singh, B. Chand, D. Mehta, M. L. Garg, R. R. Garg, S. Singh and S. Puri, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1994, 23, 339 CAS.
  8. X. Llovet, in Proceedings of 3rd Regional Workshop EMAS '98, Barcelona, Spain, 13–16 May 1998, ed. X. Llovet, C. Merlet and F. Salvat, Edicions de la Universitat de Barcelona, Spain, 1998, p. 163 Search PubMed.
  9. J. Wernisch, X-Ray Spectrom., 1985, 14, 109 CAS.
  10. C. Merlet, Mikrochim. Acta, 1994, 114/115, 363.
  11. J. Wernisch and K. Röhrbacher, Mickrochim. Acta, 1998, 15, 307 CAS.
  12. S. J. B. Reed, Electron Microprobe Analysis, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd edn., 1993 Search PubMed.
  13. C. Merlet and J. L. Bodinier, Chem. Geol., 1990, 83, 55 CAS.
  14. T. C. Huang and G. Lim, X-Ray Spectrom., 1986, 15, 245 CAS.
  15. G. Remond, P. Couture, G. Gilles and D. Massiot, Scanning Microsc., 1989, 3, 1059 Search PubMed.
  16. D. Küchler, U. Lehnert and G. Zschornack, X-Ray Spectrom., 1998, 27, 177 CAS.
  17. S. J. B. Reed, Mickrochim. Acta., 1998, 15, 29 CAS.
  18. R. Marmoret and J. M. Andre, Appl. Opt., 1983, 22, 17 CAS.