Analytical performance of the plasma source RF quadrupole ion trap in elemental and isotopic MS

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

G. C. Eiden, C. J. Barinaga and D. W. Koppenaal


Abstract

Recent progress in the development of ion trap ICP-MS instrumentation is presented in terms of performance figures of merit for trace elemental and isotopic analysis. Conventional polyatomic ion interferences are avoided altogether using collisional dissociation techniques inherent to ion trap operation. The current detection limits are in the low pg mL–1 range, as obtained over extended mass scans using multi-element solutions. The dynamic range linearity is nearly six orders of magnitude using variable injection times to control ion density in the trap. The abundance sensitivity is 105 to 106 using selective ion monitoring. Other performance figures approach or exceed those of conventional linear quadrupole based ICP-MS instrumentation.


References

  1. R. S. Houk, V. A. Fassel, G. D. Flesch, H. J. Svec, A. L. Gray and C. E. Taylor, Anal. Chem., 1980, 52, 2283 CrossRef CAS.
  2. P. P. Mahoney, S. J. Ray, G. M. Hieftje and G. Q. Li, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 1997, 8, 125 CrossRef CAS.
  3. D. P. Myers and G. M. Hieftje, Microchem. J., 1993, 48, 259 CrossRef CAS.
  4. C. J. Barinaga and D. W. Koppenaal, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 1994, 8, 71 CAS.
  5. D. W. Koppenaal, C. J. Barinaga and M. R. Smith, J. Anal. Atomic Spectrom., 1994, 9, 1053 Search PubMed.
  6. G. C. Eiden, C. J. Barinaga and D. W. Koppenaal, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom., 1997, 11, 37 CrossRef CAS.
  7. G. C. Eiden, C. J. Barinaga and D. W. Koppenaal, J. Anal. Atomic Spectrom., 1996, 11, 317 Search PubMed.
  8. T. M. Franklin, J. F. J. Todd, R. D. Smith and E. Schroeder, The 45th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Palm Springs, CA, 1997, American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Santa Fe, NM, 1997, p. 1209 Search PubMed.
  9. C. I. Frum, The 44th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry and Allied Topics, Portland, OR, 1996, American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Santa Fe, NM, 1996, p. 831 Search PubMed.
  10. K. E. Milgram, F. M. White, K. L. Goodner, C. H. Watson, D. W. Koppenaal, C. J. Barinaga, B. H. Smith, J. D. Winefordner, A. G. Marshall, R. S. Houk and J. R. Eyler, Anal. Chem., 1997, 69, 3714 CrossRef CAS.
  11. L. C. Alves, M. G. Minnich, D. R. Wiederin and R. S. Houk, J. Anal. Atomic Spectrom., 1994, 9, 399 Search PubMed.
  12. S. D. Tanner, M. Paul, S. A. Beres and E. R. Denoyer, Atomic Spectroscopy, 1995, 16, 16 Search PubMed.
  13. J. F. J. Todd, in Practical Aspects of Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry, ed. R. E. March and J. F. J. Todd, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995, vol. 1, pp. 3–24 Search PubMed.
  14. R. E. March, R. J. Strife and C. S. Creaser, in Practical Aspects of Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry, ed. R. E. March and J. F. J. Todd, CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995, vol. 3, pp. 27–88 Search PubMed.
  15. S. A. Mcluckey, G. L. Glish, D. C. Duckworth and R. K. Marcus, Anal. Chem., 1992, 64, 1606 CrossRef CAS.
  16. D. C. Duckworth, D. H. Smith and S. A. McLuckey, ICP Inf. Newsl., 1998, 23, 298 Search PubMed.
  17. G. C. Eiden, C. J. Barinaga and D. W. Koppenaal, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 1996, 7, 1161 CrossRef CAS.
  18. F. A. Londry and R. E. March, Intl. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes, 1995, 144, 87 Search PubMed.
  19. J. C. Schwartz, presented at the Sanibel Island Conference on Ion Traps, Sanibel Island, FL, 1997 Search PubMed.
  20. The degradation is not quite a linear function of the total charge in the trap since the m/z separation between the ion of interest and the other ions in the trap also affects the magnitude of space charge effects.
  21. At a resolution of 1000 and a scan rate of 2000 Da s–1, each ion packet is ejected in a 25 µs burst; taking the detector response time to be 10 ns and a pile-up limit to be 100 ns average per ion, this gives a pulse pile-up limited number of ions in the 25 µs of 250. This is also near the space charge limit of the ion trap for high resolution operation. ‘Dark’ count rates from the ion trap are much less than 1 count s–1, but a reasonable estimate of dynamic range for a pulse counting ion trap is 1000 without using variable ion injection times. With variable ion injection times, this dynamic range could be extended by another three orders of magnitude to ∼106.
  22. A. A. Makarov, Anal. Chem., 1996, 68, 4257 CrossRef CAS.
  23. J. D. Williams, K. A. Cox, R. G. Cooks, S. A. Mcluckey, K. J. Hart and D. E. Goeringer, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66, 725 CrossRef CAS.
  24. N. S. Arnold, G. Hars and H. L. C. Meuzelaar, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 1994, 5, 676 CrossRef CAS.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.