Correlation of urinary nickel excretion with observed ‘total’ and inhalable aerosol exposures of nickel refinery workers

Abstract

An investigation of the relationship between observed nickel aerosol exposures and urinary nickel excretion was undertaken at a Scandinavian nickel refinery. The goal of the study was to assess the impact of nickel aerosol speciation, the use of particle size-selective sampling instrumentation and adjustment of urinary levels for creatinine excretion on the usefulness of urinary nickel excretion as a marker for exposure. Urinary nickel measurements and paired ‘total' and inhalable aerosol exposure measurements were collected each day for one week from refinery workers in four process areas. The mean observed urinary nickel concentration was 12 µg L^–1 (11 µg of Ni per g of creatinine). The strongest relationships between urinary excretion and aerosol exposure were found when urinary nickel levels were adjusted for creatinine excretion and when exposure to only soluble forms of nickel aerosol was considered. No significant difference was observed between measures of ‘total' and inhalable aerosol in the ability to predict urinary excretion patterns. In the light of these results, it is recommended that consideration be given to the chemical species distribution of nickel aerosol in the use of urinary nickel measurements as a screening tool for cancer risk in occupationally-exposed populations.

References

1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices, ACGIH, Cincinnati, OH, 1998.
2. R. M. Doll, A. A. Andersen, W. C. Cooper, I. Cosmatos, D. L. Cragle and D. Easton and 16 others, Scand. J. Work Environ. Health, 1990, 16(Suppl. 1), 1.
3. Y. Thomassen, E. Nieboer, D. Ellingson, S. Hetland, T. Norseth, J. Ø. Odland, N. Romanova, S. Chernova and V. P. Tchachtchine, J. Environ. Monit., 1999, 1, 15.
4. D. Mark and J. H. Vincent, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 1986, 30, 89.
5. L. C. Kenny, R. J. Aitken, C. Chalmers, J. F. Fabries, E. Gonzalez-Fernandez, H. Kromhout, G. Liden, D. Mark, G. Riediger and V. Prodi, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 1997, 41, 135.
6. V. J. Zatka, J. S. Warner and D. Maskery, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1992, 26, 138.
7. D. G. Kleinbaum, K. L. Kupper and K. E. Muller, Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods, Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA, USA, 2nd edn., 1988.
8. P. J. Tsai, J. H. Vincent, G. Wahl and G. Maldonado, Occup. Environ. Med., 1995, 52, 793.
9. M. A. Werner, T. M. Spear and J. H. Vincent, Analyst, 1996, 121, 1207.
10. T. M. Spear, M. A. Werner, J. M. Bootland, A. Harbour, E. P. Murray, R. Rossi and J. H. Vincent, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1997, 58, 893.
11. M. A. Werner, J. H. Vincent, Y. Thomassen, S. Hetland and S. Berge, Occup. Hyg., 1999, in the press.
12. A. C. Høgetveit, R. T. Barton and C. O. Kostøl, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 1978, 21, 113.
13. W. Torjussen and I. Andersen, Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., 1978, 8, 184.
14. L. Ulrich, M. Sulcová, L. Spacek, E. Neumanová and M. Vladár, Sci. Total Environ., 1991, 101, 91.
15. B. D. Culver, P. T. Shen, T. H. Taylor, A. Lee-Feldstein, H. Anton-Culver and P. Strong, Environ. Health Persp, 1994, 102(Suppl 7), 133.
16. M. Kiilunen, J. Utela, T. Rantanen, H. Norppa, A. Tossavainen, M. Koponen, H. Paakkulainen and A. Aitio, Ann. Occup. Hyg., 1997, 41, 167.
17. J. H. Vincent, P. J. Tsai and J. S. Warner, Analyst, 1995, 120, 675.
18. M. Kiilunen, Occupational Exposure to Chromium and Nickel in Finland and Its Estimation by Biological Monitoring, Doctoral Dissertation, Kupio University, Kuopio, Finland, 1994.