Fluorescence quenching of polycyclic aromatic compounds by humic substances. Part 1. Methodology for the determination of sorption coefficients

Abstract

An introduction to the methodology of fluorescence quenching measurements as an experimental tool for investigating the sorption of hydrophobic organic substances by dissolved organic matter (OM) is given. Special attention is paid to the implications of inner-filter effects (IFEs) on the determination of sorption coefficients. The essential aspects of the theoretical description of IFEs are outlined and various procedures for the IFE correction of fluorescence quenching measurements in the presence of dissolved OM are presented. Geometric parameters relevant for the quantitative description of IFE applying a 90° arrangement between fluorescence excitation and detection are determined by different methods, newly developed or adapted from the literature, for the fluorescence spectrometer used in this work. Moreover, an experimental validation of the applicability of different IFE correction procedures is performed. In order to evaluate the variations of sorption coefficients that result from the use of different IFE correction procedures, the quenching of the fluorescence of the well-known polycyclic aromatic compound pyrene by a commercially available humic substance in aqueous solution is investigated. Compared to the apparent sorption coefficient, which is obtained without any IFE correction, the sorption coefficients determined with the correction of primary IFE or with the correction of primary and secondary IFE are on average ca. 40 or 60% lower. The application of different IFE correction procedures allows the determination of sorption coefficients with appropriate precision of ±15%.

References

1. Humic Substances in the Global Environmental and Implications on Human Health, Proceedings of the 6th International Meeting of the International Humic Substances Society, Monopoli (Bari), Italy, September 20–25, 1992, ed. N. Senesi and T. M. Miano, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994.
2. Humic and Fulvic Acids: Isolation, Structure, and Environmental Role, ed. J. S. Gaffney, N. A. Marley and S. B. Clark, ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, 1996, vol. 651.
3. Humic Substances in Terrestrial Ecosystems, ed. A. Piccolo, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996.
4. W. Kördel, M. Dassenakis, J. Lintelmann and S. Padberg, Pure Appl. Chem., 1997, 69, 1571.
5. The Role of Humic Substances in the Ecosystems and in Environmental Protection, Proceedings of the 8th Meeting of the International Humic Substances Society, Wroclaw, Poland, September 9–14, 1996, ed. J. Drozd, S. S. Gonet, N. Senesi and J. Weber, PTSH–Polish Society of Humic Substances, Polish Chapter of the International Humic Substances Society, Wroclaw, Poland, 1997.
6. E. M. Murphy, J. M. Zachara and S. C. Smith, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1990, 24, 1507.
7. B. T. Mader, K. Uwe-Goss and S. J. Eisenreich, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 1079.
8. B. von Ospen, W. Kördel and W. Klein, Chemosphere., 1991, 22, 285.
9. W. Huang and W. J. Weber Jr., Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 2562.
10. B. M. Gawlik, N. Sotiriou, E. A. Feicht, S. Schulte-Hostede and A. Kettrup, Chemosphere, 1997, 34, 2525.
11. C. T. Chiou, S. E. McGroddy and D. E. Kile, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 32, 264.
12. A. T. Kan, G. Fu, M. Hunter, W. Chen, C. H. Ward and M. B. Tomson, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 32, 892.
13. T. D. Gauthier, E. C. Shane, W. F. Guerin, W. R. Seitz and C. L. Grant, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1986, 20, 1162.
14. M. M. Puchalski, M. J. Morra and R. von Wandruszka, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem., 1991, 340, 341.
15. C. T. Chiou, P. E. Porter and D. W. Schmedding, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1983, 17, 227.
16. F. C. Spurlock and J. W. Biggar, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1994, 28, 989.
17. W. J. Weber Jr., P. M. McGinley and I. E. Katz, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1992, 26, 1955.
18. B. Xing and J. J. Pignatello, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 792.
19. K. A. Connors, Binding Constants, Wiley, New York, 1987.
20. C. T. Chiou, D. E. Kile, T. I. Brinton, R. L. Malcolm, J. A. Leenheer and P. MacCarthy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1987, 21, 1231.
21. S. Tanaka, K. Oba, M. Fukushima, K. Nakayasu and K. Hasebe, Anal. Chim. Acta., 1997, 337, 351.
22. J. F. McCarthy and B. D. Jimenez, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1985, 19, 1072.
23. F. De Paolis and J. Kukkonen, Chemosphere, 1997, 34, 1693.
24. P. F. Landrum, S. R. Nilhart, B. J. Eadie and W. S. Gardner, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1984, 18, 187.
25. B. Raber, I. Kögel-Knabner, C. Stein and D. Klem, Chemosphere, 1998, 36, 79.
26. J. Pörschmann, F.-D. Kopinke and J. Pawliszyn, J. Chromatogr. A., 1998, 816, 159.
27. E. Urrestarazu Ramos, S. N. Meijer, W. H. J. Vaes, H. J. M. Verhaar and J. L. M. Hermens, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 32, 3430.
28. D. A. Backhus and P. M. Gschwend, Environ Sci. Technol., 1990, 24, 1214.
29. M. A. Schlautman and J. J. Morgan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1993, 27, 961.
30. M. U. Kumke, H.-G. Löhmannsröben and Th. Roch, Analyst, 1994, 119, 997.
31. M. U. Kumke, H.-G. Löhmannsröben and Th. Roch, J. Fluoresc., 1995, 5, 139.
32. U. Zimmermann, H.-G. Löhmannsröben and T. Skrivanek, in Remote Sensing of Vegetation and Water, and Standardization of Remote Sensing Methods, ed. G. Cecchi, T. Lamp, R. Reuter and K. Weber, Proc. SPIE, International Society for Optical Engineering, Bellingham, Washington, 1997, vol. 3107, pp. 239–249.
33. C. L. Tiller and K. D. Jones, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 424.
34. C. A. Parker, Photoluminescence of Solutions, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1968.
35. J. F. Holland, R. T. Teets, P. M. Kelly and A. Timnick, Anal. Chem., 1977, 49, 706.
36. B. C. MacDonald, S. J. Lvin and H. Patterson, Anal Chim Acta, 1997, 338, 155.
37. M. Kubista, R. Sjöback, S. Eriksson and B. Albinsson, Analyst, 1994, 119, 417.
38. J. R. Lakowicz, Prunciples of Fiuorescence Speciroscopy, Plenum Press, New York, 1983.