Ultrasonic extraction and portable anodic stripping voltammetric measurement of lead in paint, dust wipes, soil, and air: An interlaboratory evaluation

Abstract

Recent studies have demonstrated the utility of ultrasonic extraction (UE), followed by portable anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV), for the on-site determination of lead in environmental and industrial hygiene samples. The aim of this work was to conduct an interlaboratory evaluation of the UE-ASV procedure, with a goal of establishing estimates of method performance based on results from collaborative interlaboratory analysis. In this investigation, performance evaluation materials (PEMs) with characterized lead concentrations were used for interlaboratory testing of the UE-ASV procedure. The UE-ASV protocol examined has been promulgated in the form of two separate national voluntary consensus standards (one for UE and another for electroanalysis, which includes ASV). The PEMs consisted of characterized and homogenized paints, soils, and dusts (the last of which were spiked onto wipes meeting national voluntary consensus standard specifications), and air filter samples (mixed cellulose ester membrane) generated using characterized paints within an aerosol chamber. The lead concentrations within the PEMs were chosen so as to bracket pertinent action levels for lead in the various sample matrices. The interlaboratory evaluation was conducted so as to comply with an applicable national voluntary consensus standard that can be used to estimate the interlaboratory precision of a given analytical test method. Based on the analytical results reported by the participating laboratories, relative standard deviations (RSDs) for repeatability and reproducibility were computed for three different lead contents of the four PEMs. RSDs for repeatability were 0.019-0.100 for paints; 0.030-0.151 for soils; 0.085-0.134 for dust wipes; and 0.095-0.137 for air filters. RSDs for reproducibility were 0.127-0.213 for paints; 0.062-0.162 for soils; 0.085-0.134 for dust wipes; and 0.114-0.220 for air filters. With the exception of one of the air filter samples and one of the paint samples, the precision estimates were within the ±20% precision requirement specified in the US Environmental Protection Agency National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program (NLLAP). The results of this investigation illustrate that the UE-ASV procedure is an effective method for the quantitative measurement of lead in the matrices evaluated in this study.

References

1. K. Ashley, Electroanalysis, 1995, 7, 1189.
2. US EPA, Evaluation of the Performance of Reflectance and Electrochemical Technologies for the Measurement of Lead in Characterized Paints, Bulk Dusts, and Soils(EPA 600/R-95–093), EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1996.
3. K. Ashley, Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 1998, 13, 94.
4. K. Ashley, M. Hunter, L. H. Tait, J. Dozier, J. L. Seaman and P. F. Berry, Field Anal. Chem. Technol., 1998, 2, 39.
5. K. Ashley, K. J. Mapp and M. Millson, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1998, 59, 671.
6. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, ed. M. E. Cassinelli and P. F. O'Connor, Method No. 7701, NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH, 4th edn., 2nd Suppl., 1998.
7. ASTM PS 87, ‘Provisional standard practice for ultrasonic extraction of paint, dust, soil and air samples for subsequent determination of lead,’ in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1998, vol. 04.11.
8. ASTM PS 88, ‘Provisional standard practice for determination oflead in paint, settled dust, soil, and air particulate by field-portable electroanalysis,’ in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1998, vol. 01.11.
9. C. A. Esche, J. H. Groff, P. C. Schlecht and S. A. Shulman, Proficiency Analytical Testing and Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing Programs[DHHS (NIOSH) Publ. No. 95–104], NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH, 1994.
10. K. Ashley, Trends Anal. Chem., 1998, 17, 366.
11. J. Wang, in Laboratory Techniques in Electroanalytical Chemistry, ed. P. T. Kissinger and W. R. Heineman, Marcel Dekker, New York, 2nd edn., 1996, ch. 24.
12. ASTM E691, ‘Standard practice for conducting an interlaboratory study to determine the precision of a test method,’ in ASTM Standards on Precision and Bias for Various Applications, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 4th edn., 1992.
13. P. C. Schlecht, J. H. Groff, A. Feng and R. Song, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1996, 57, 035.
14. P. C. Schlecht, R. Song, J. H. Groff, H. A. Feng and C. A. Esche, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1997, 58, 779.
15. ASTM E1792, ‘Standard specification for wipe sampling materials for lead in surface dust,’ in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1998, vol. 04.11.
16. US EPA, Evaluation of Hotplate- and Microwave-Based Methods for Extracting Lead in Paint, Dust, and Soil with Measurement by Atomic Absorption Spectrometry and Inductively Coupled Plasma Emission Spectrometry(EPA 600/R-94/147), EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1995.
17. D. A. Weyel, M. Ellakkani, Y. Alarie and M. Karol, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 1984, 76, 544.
18. T. P. Carsey, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1987, 48, 710.
19. P. A. Baron and G. J. Deye, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1990, 51, 51.
20. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods, ed. P. M. Eller and M. E. Cassinelli, Method No. 7105, NIOSH, Cincinnati, OH, 4th edn., 1994.
21. ASTM Form and Style for ASTM Standards, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 8th edn., 1989.
22. J. C. Miller and J. N. Miller, Statistics for Analytical Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1984, ch. 3.
23. Use of Statistics to Develop and Evaluate Analytical Methods, ed. G. T. Wernimont and W. Spendley, American Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, 1985, ch. 4.
24. P. C. Meier and R. E. Zund, Statistical Methods in Analytical Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1993, ch. 1.
25. US EPA, National Lead Laboratory Accreditation Program, EPA, Washington, DC, 1993.
26. ASTM E1775, ‘Standard guide for evaluating the performance of on-site extraction and field-portable electrochemical or spectrophotometric analysis for lead,’ in Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM, W. Conshohocken, PA, 1998, vol. 04.11.
27. US EPA, Preparation of Lead-Containing Paint and Dust Method Evaluation Materials and Verification of the Protocol by Round-Robin Analysis(EPA 600/R-93/235), EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1993.