Cement for stabilisation of industrial residues containing heavy metals

Abstract

A method aimed at decreasing the toxicity of heavy metals [namely, Zn(II) and Cr(III)] in real polluted residues by immobilisation has been developed. The residues were processed either with two cement-type stabilisers or lime. The cement-type stabilisers were Portland cement and Depocrete SM/2 at the self-generated pH (ca. 11) which afforded physical as well as chemical potential for the immobilisation of heavy metals. The other stabiliser, lime, reduced organic compounds, thus favouring the decrease of the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and endowing the residue with better mechanical properties for transport. After leaching the stabilised residues using the standard leaching test [Order 13/10/89, Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) 270 10/11/89], three ways for establishing the toxicity of the treated residues were used, namely: (1) the ecotoxicity test using Photobacterium phosphoreum (DIN 38 412); (2) determination of the concentration of heavy metals by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS); (3) determination of the COD or oxygen required for complete chemical oxidation of a water sample. Portland cement (20%) blended with Depocrete SM/2 (3%) acted as an effective stabiliser for residues containing heavy metals as it increased the ecotoxicity index (EC₅₀) by more than five times. Thus the heavy metal concentration in the leaching liquid was lowered to less than 0.1 mg l^–1. The addition of 5% of lime afforded a residue easily transportable from the place of treatment to the landfill. The precision of the method was studied in terms of both repeatability and reproducibility. The values found with respect to EC₅₀ and expressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) were 1.6% and 5.1%, respectively.

References

1. P. Cambier, Analusis Magazine, 1994, 22, M21.
2. C. M. Davidson and A. L. Duncan, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1998, 363, 45.
3. T. Taylor and B. S. Crannell, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 3330.
4. B. Lothenbach, G. Furrer and R. Schulin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 1452.
5. C. M. Lytle, F. W. Lytle, N. Yang, J. H. Qian, D. Hansen, A. Zayed and N. Terry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 32, 3087.
6. A. R. Pratt, D. W. Blowes and C. J. Ptacek, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 2492.
7. D. W. Blowes, C. J. Ptacek and J. L. Jambor, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 3348.
8. A. Bobrowski and J. Malolepszy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 745.
9. A. Kindness, A. Macias and F. P. Glasser, Waste Management, 1994, 14, 3.
10. T. Korenaga and H. Ikatsu, Analyst, 1981, 106, 653.
11. M. L. Balconi, M. Borgarello, F. Realini and R. Ferraroli, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1992, 261, 295.
12. Ministerio de la Presidencia, Luminescence Bioassay, Boletín Oficial del Estado, Madrid, 1989, Anexo 4, p. 35 220.
13. B. Lange, Operation Manual for Luminescent Bacteria Test with Lumistox, Gmb Berlin Industrience Technik, Dusseldorf, Edition 02/93, 1993, p. 1.
14. Ministerio de Obras Públicas y Urbanismo, Reglamento del Dominio Público Hidrá;ulico, Madrid, Real Decreto 849/1986, p. 419.
15. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official methods of Analysis, ed. K. Helrich, Arlington, Virginia, 15th edn., 1990, pp. 317–318.
16. B. Vallejo, A. Izquierdo and M. D. Luque de Castro, Analyst, 1999, 124, 1261.