Reduction and avoidance of lubricant mist demands an integrated assessment approach

Abstract

A case study to identify major factors for lubricant mist exposure covered 15 metal machining sites. The investigation included milling, turning, drilling and grinding applications. Systematic analysis considered all relevant data concerning the machine tool, the lubricant and the suction plant. The efficiency of the implemented maintenance program at the installed filter systems was checked by concentration measurements immediately before and after service. All performed measurements of lubricant aerosol and vapor loads upstream and downstream of the installed filter systems were carried out according to VDI 2066 and BIA 3110, respectively. The selection criteria for the sites to be investigated, the systematic nature of the data acquisition and the procedure of the analysis are demonstrated in detail by performing comparisons between selected applications using emulsions and those employing straight oil for lubrication. The results of the study identify recirculation of ventilated air as the major source of workplace exposure to airborne lubricant emissions. More than 60% of the demisters investigated emit air at total lubricant loads (aerosols and vapor) above the limit of 20 mg m^–3 at any time of operation; which also means immediately after service. A common reason for exceeded aerosol loads in recirculated air is e.g. the fact that the type of filter system applied is often not suitable for the separation problem. Loads of lubricant vapor are usually higher at the processes which use water emulsions as lubricant. In a quarter of the cases the limits were exceeded solely due to high vapor loads even immediately after service. The exposure can be reduced by replacing the lubricant, installation of a vapor separation plant or avoiding air recirculation. Maintenance time of the demisting system and aerosol separation efficiency of state-of-the-art demisting systems can be expanded by implementation of enhanced preliminary filter stages. This study confirms that appropriate service measures lower both aerosol emissions and lubricant vapor concentrations due to the reduction of exposed oil-wetted surfaces. The performed measurements show no significant relationship between loads of airborne lubricants and the type of machining process. Therefore, investigations at a much more detailed level have to be performed. However, the individual assessment of any workplace due to the complex situation remains essential.

References

1. HVBG, Berufsgenossenschaftliches Institut f. Arbeitssicherheit, BIA Report 7/96, Kühlschmierstoffe, St. Augustin, 1996.
2. US Department of Health and Human Services (NIOSH), Occupational Exposure to Metalworking Fluids—What you need to know about, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Publication No. 98–116, 1998.
3. US Department of Health and Human Services (NIOSH), Occupational Exposure to Metalworking Fluids—Criteria for a Recommended Standard, Education and Information Division of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Cincinnati, Publication No. 98–102, 1998.
4. AUVA Merkblatt M 368–1907, Kühlschmierstoffe, Unfallverhütungsdienst der Allgemeinen Unfallversicherungsanstalt, Wien, 1997.
5. T. Mang and H. Kraner, Mineraloel-Tech., 1978, 23(7/8), 1.
6. Wirtschaftskammer Österreich, Statistisches Jahrbuch 1997, Wirtschaftskammer Österreich, Wein, May 1998.
7. HVBG, Messung von Gefahrstoffen—BIA Arbeitsmappe, Erich Schmidt Verlag, 12th edn. IV/94, 1994.