Assessment of occupational exposure to diesel fumes-parameter optimization of the thermal coulometric measurement method for carbon

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Vincent Perret, Cong K. Huynh, Pierre-Olivier Droz, Trinh Vu Duc and Michel Guillemin


Abstract

‘Elemental’ carbon (EC) is used as a surrogate to assess occupational exposure to diesel soot. EC thermal analysis needs complete desorption of organic compounds from the soot particles prior to analysis in order to minimize positive interferences and artefacts. The desorption of the organic compounds can be considered as the major step which influences the reliability of the EC determination. A systematic study was carried out to investigate the different parameters of influence such as desorption temperature, desorption duration, heating rate and type of the sample on the desorption efficiency. It was found that temperature and duration are the major parameters of influence on the desorption efficiency. The influence of the sample load can be seen as a measure of the pyrolysis susceptibility of the sample. An optimized temperature program is proposed.


References

  1. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Vol. 46, Diesel and Gasoline Exhausts and Some Nitroarenes. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 1989 Search PubMed.
  2. Health Effects Institute, Diesel Exhaust: a Critical Analysis of Emissions, Exposure, and Health Effects, Special Report of the Institute's Diesel Working Group, Health Effects Institute (HEI), Cambridge, MA, 1995 Search PubMed.
  3. B. Bhatia, P. Lopipero and A. H. Smith, Epidemiology, 1998, 9, 84 CrossRef.
  4. International Programme on Chemical Safety, Diesel Fuel and Exhaust Emissions, Environmental Health Criteria No. 171, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996 Search PubMed.
  5. U. Heinrich, R. Fuhrst and S. Rittinghausen, Inhal. Toxicol., 1995, 7, 533 CAS.
  6. K. Steenland, D. Silvermann and D. Zaebst, Am. J. Ind. Med., 1992, 21, 887 CAS.
  7. E. Brich and R. A. Cary, Analyst, 1996, 121, 1183 RSC.
  8. J. Perez and R. L. Williams, SAE (Soc. Automot. Eng.) Tech. Pap., 1989, No. 894291 Search PubMed.
  9. D. M. Smith, M. S. Akhter, J. A. Jassim, C. A. Sergides, W. F. Welch and A. R. Chugghtai, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 1989, 10, 311 CAS.
  10. B. K. Cantrell and W. F. Watts, Jr., Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg., 1997, 12, 1019 CAS.
  11. S.-J. Chen, S.-H. Lioa, W.-J. Jian and C.-C. Lin, Environ. Int., 1997, 4, 475 CrossRef.
  12. Von den Berufsgenossenschaften anerkannte Analysenverfahren zur Festellung der Konzentrationen krebserzeugender Arbeitstoffe in der Luft in Arbeitsbereichen. Method No 44: Diesel Engine Emission, ZH 1/120, Carl Heymanns Verlag, Cologne, 1995 Search PubMed.
  13. E. Birch, Analyst, 1998, 123, 851 RSC.
  14. N. R. Khalili, P. A. Scheff and T. M. Holsen, Atmos. Environ., 1995, 29, 553 CrossRef CAS.
  15. E. Birch, ECDSE Meeting, Berlin, personal communication, 1998.
  16. H. Cachier, M.-P. Bremond and P. Buat-Ménard, Tellus, 1989, 41B, 379 Search PubMed.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.