Field intercomparison of diffusive samplers for measuring ammonia

Abstract

Agricultural production systems are recognised as a major source of atmospheric ammonia. Deposition of ammonia and ammonium may contribute to undesired changes in oligotrophic ecosystems. The continuous measurement of atmospheric ammonia requires expensive and sophisticated techniques and is performed only in a very restrict number of ambient air stations in Europe. Therefore, the application of passive samplers, which have the advantage of being easy to handle and cost-efficient, is useful. In the past the comparability of different passive samplers must be considered as rather scarce. In a joint European project under the leadership of the GSF-Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Neuherberg, in 1997 a comparison of different passive ammonia monitoring methods was carried out in a prealpine rural site near Garmisch-Partenkirchen. It was considered valuable to include not only well established systems but also methods still being developed. For the comparative test ten working groups with different methods took part. A wet annular denuder system, which has been developed by the Netherlands Energy Research Foundation for on-line measurement of atmospheric ammonia, served as reference of passive methods. The experiment, which started in June and finished in December, showed that most of the passive samplers fulfil the requirements and can be recommended for further measurements. Additional measurements of meteorological parameters were performed to check the influences of different weather conditions on passive sampling.

References

1. W. A. H. Asman, Nova Acta Leopold., NF70 1994, 288, 263.
2. E. Mattews, Global biogeochem. cycles, 1994, 8(4), 411.
3. J. M. M. Aben, P. S. C. Heuberger, R. C. Acharya and A. L. M. Dekkers, Preliminary validation of ammonia emission data using a combination of monitoring and modelling. Proceedings Acidification Symp. Den Bosch, Acid Rain Research; Do we have enough answers?, (ed. Erisman Heij)Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995, p. 81–90.
4. M. A. Sutton, C. J. Place, M. Eager, D. Fowler and R. I. Smith, Atmos. Environ., 1995, 29(12), 1393.
5. M. A. Sutton, PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1990.
6. W. A. J. van Pul, C. J. M. Potma, E. P. van Leeuwen, G. P. J. Draaijers and J. W. Erisman, EDACS: European deposition maps of acidifying components on small scale: model description and preliminary results, Report RIVM no 722401005, 1995.
7. N. van Breemen and H. F. G. van Dijk, Environ. Pollut., 1988, 54, 249.
8. H. Ellenberg, Ökologische Veränderungen in Biozönosen durch Stickstoffeintrag. Symposium ‘Ammoniak in der Umwelt’, 10. bis 12. Oktober 1990, Bundesforschungsanszalt für Landwirtschaft (FAL) Braunschweig-Volkenrode, 1991.
9. Länderausschuss für Immissionsschutz (LAI), Bewertung von Ammoniak- und Ammoniumimmissionen, Bericht des Unterausschusses ‘Wirkungsfragen’ Erich Schmidt Verlag, 1995.
10. J. W. Erisman, R. Bobbink and L. van der Eerden, Nitrogen pollution on the local and regional scale: the present state of knowledge and research needs, Report RIVM no 722108010, 1996.
11. A. Fangmeier, A. Hadwiger-Fangmeier, L. van der Eerden and H. J. Jaeger, Environ. Pollut., 1994, 86, 43.
12. J. P. Hettelingh, R. H. Gardner and L. Hordijk, Environ. Pollut., 1992, 77, 177.
13. R. van Aalst, L. Edwards, T. Pulles, E. de Saeger, M. Tombrou and D. Tonnesen, Guidance report on supplementary assessment under EC Air Quality Directives, second draft, April 1997, p. 51.
14. CEN ( 1998 a) Ambient Air Quality: Diffusive samplers for the determination of concentrations of gases and vapours; Requirements and test methods. Part 1: General requirements, draft report, January 1998.
15. CEN ( 1998 b) Ambient Air Quality: Diffusive samplers for the determination of concentrations of gases and vapours; Requirements and test methods. Part 2: Requirements and test methods, draft report, August 1998.
16. CEN ( 1998 c) Ambient Air Quality: Diffusive samplers for the determination of concentrations of gases and vapours; Requirements and test methods. Part 3: Guide for selection, use and maintanance, draft report, May 1998.
17. E. D. Palmes, A. F. Gunnison, J. Di Mattio and C. Tomczyk, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1976, 37, 570.
18. R. H. Brown, Pure Appl. Chem., 1993, 65(8), 1859.
19. P. Hofschreuder, W. van der Meulen, P. Heeres and J. Slanina, J. Environ. Monit., 1999, accepted.
20. M. Kirchner, Durchführung von Vergleichsversuchen zur Austestung von Passivsammlern, 1997, Wetter und Leben 49, H.4.
21. M. Kirchner, S. Braeutigam and G. Welzl, Validierung von Passivsammlern zur Messung von Ammoniak im Freiland, 1998, GSF-Bericht 18/98.
22. A. Blatter, M. Fahrni and A. Neftel, CEC Air Pollut. Res. Rep. 41,, 1992.
23. M. Ferm and H. Rodhe, J. Atmos. Chem., 1997, 27, 17.
24. A. Kasper and H. Puxbaum, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem., 1994, 350, 448.
25. L. De Temmerman and P. Coosemans, Ammonia and ammonium deposition on pine stands in Belgium. Proc. 14th meeting for Spezialists in Air Pollution effects on forest ecosystems (IUFRO p2.05): ‘Air pollution and forest decline’, Interlaken. ed. J. B. Bucher and I. Bucher-Wallin, Interlaken, Austria, 1989, vol. 1, p. 91–96.
26. G. P. Wyers, R. P. Otjes and J. Slanina, Atmos. Environ. Part A, 1993, 27(13), 2085.