The effect of wind direction on the observed size distribution of particle adsorbed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on an inner city sampling site

Abstract

An investigation of the variability in the size distribution of particle adsorbed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on an inner city sampling site showed differences depending on the wind direction.Particle size distributions of PAHs from outdoor air sampling were measured in Munich from 1994 to 1997. The sampling site is located northeast of a crossing with heavy traffic and southwest of a large inner city park. Depending on the wind direction, three different size distributions of particle adsorbed PAHs were observed. The maximum PAH concentration on very small particles (geometric mean diameter 75 nm) was observed with wind from west to southwest coming directly from the crossing area or the roads with heavy traffic. The maximum PAH concentration on particles with geometric mean diameter of 260 nm was found on days with wind from the built-up area north of the sampling site. On particles with geometric mean diameter of 920 nm the maximum PAH concentration was found on days with main wind directions from northeast to east. On these days the wind is blowing from the direction of the city park nearby. The distribution of particle adsorbed PAHs within different particle size classes is substantially influenced by the distance of the sampling site from strong sources of PAH loaded particulate matter.

References

1. J. Pekkanen, K. L. Timonen, J. Ruuskanen, A. Reponen and A. Mirme, Environ. Res., 1997, 74, 24.
2. P. Penttinen, K. L. Timonen, P. Tiittanen, M. Vallius, A. Mirme, J. Ruuskanen and J. Pekkanen, Resp. Crit. Care Med., 1998, 157, A878 (Abstract).
3. J. Schwartz, D. W. Dockery and L. M. Neas, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 1996, 46, 927.
4. K. Ito and G. D. Thurston, J. Expos. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol., 1996, 6, 79.
5. P. Pagano, T. de Zaiacomo, E. Scarcella, S. Bruni and M. Calamosca, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1996, 30, 3512.
6. C. Venkataraman, J. M. Lyons and S. K. Friedlander, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1994, 28, 555.
7. C. Venkataraman and S. K. Friedlander, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1994, 28, 563.
8. V. M. Kerminen, T. E. Makela, C. H. Ojanen, R. E. Hillamo, J. K. Vilhunen, L. Rantanen, N. Havers, A. von Bohlen and D. Klockow, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1997, 31, 1883.
9. Z. D. Ristovski, L. Morawska, N. D. Bofinger and J. Hitchins, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1998, 32, 3845.
10. C. A. Noble and K. A. Prather, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1996, 30, 2667.
11. T. Tuch, P. Brand, H. E. Wichmann and J. Heyder, Atmos. Environ., 1997, 31, 4193.
12. C. K. Li and R. M. Kamens, Atmos. Environ., Part A, 1993, 27, 523.
13. D. Y. H. Pui and D. R. Chen, J. Aerosol Sci., 1997, 28, 539.
14. A. Trier, Atmos. Environ., 1997, 31, 909.
15. J. Schnelle, T. Jänsch, K. Wolf, I. Gebefügi and A. Kettrup, Chemosphere, 1995, 31, 3119.
16. J. Schnelle, K. Wolf, G. Frank, B. Hietel, I. Gebefügi and A. Kettrup, Analyst, 1996, 121, 1301.