The influence of geometry and draught shields on the performance of passive samplers

Abstract

Passive samplers provide an excellent opportunity to perform indicative measurements or establish a dense network of measuring sites. A drawback compared with conventional active measuring methods is the larger spread of results. This variation can, to a large extent, be attributed to the influence of temperature, sampler geometry and wind on sampling results. A proper design of sampler geometry and optimum choice of draught shield can reduce the influence of wind velocity on a badge type sampler to less than 10%. Wire mesh screens prove to be inadequate in damping turbulence. Filters give good results. Attention should be paid to the size and isolation value of the walls of the sampler to prevent thermal updrafts occurring within the sampler. Tube type samplers are less influenced by wind, provided that turbulence is prevented from influencing diffusion within the sampler.

References

1. R. van Aalst, L. Edwards, T. Pulles, E. de Saeger, M. Tombrou and D. Tonnesen, Guidance Report on Supplementary Assessment Under EC Air Quality Directives. Second Draft, European Commission, Brussels, 1997.
2. E. D. Palmes, A. F. Gunnison, J. Di Matteo and C. Tomczyk, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1976, 37, 570.
3. R. G. Lewis, J. D. Mulik, R. W. Coutant, G. W. Wooten and C. R. McMillin, Anal. Chem., 1985, 57, 214.
4. K. J. Hargreaves and D. H. F. Atkins, The Measurement of Ammonia in the Outdoor Environment Using Passive Diffusion Tube Samplers, Report AERE R 12568, Harwell Laboratory, Culham, 1987.
5. D. B. Orr, J. C. Hipfner, W. H. Chan, M. A. Lusis and J. E. Hunt, Atmos. Environ., 1987, 21, 1473.
6. T. Hafkenscheid, Comments on Document CEN/TC 264/II n 50, 1998, (Concerning Correction for Pressure and Temperature for Passive Samplers), CEN/TC 264/WG11 N69, 1998.
7. J. L. Monteith and M. H. Unsworth, Principles of Environmental Physics, Edward Arnold, London, 1990.
8. P. Pérez Ballesta, E. G. Ferradas and A. M. Aznar, Environ. Sci. Technol., 1993, 27, 2031.
9. Ambient Air Quality; Diffusive Samplers for the Determination of Gases and Vapours—Requirements and Test Methods, Part I. General Requirements, Draft Report, CEN/TC 264/WG11, 1998.
10. Ambient Air Quality; Diffusive Samplers for the Determination of Gases and Vapours—Requirements and Test Methods. Part 3. Guide for Selection, Use and Maintenance, Draft Report, CEN/TC 264/WG11, 1998.
11. R. H. Brown, Pure Appl. Chem., 1993, 65, 1859.
12. J. J. H. Willems and P. Hofschreuder, in A Passive Monitor for Measuring Ammonia, ed. I. Allegrini, A. Febo and C. Perrino. Air Pollution Research Report 37, 1991, CEC, Brussels, pp. 113–121.
13. G. P. Wyers, A. Wayers, J. J. Moels, Th. R. Thysse, J. H. Puyzer, H. L. M. Verhagen and J. W. Erioman, Karakterisering van de Regionale Concentratievelden van Ammoniak: Monstername en Meetstrategie, ECN Report C-95-109, 1995.
14. J. D. Posner and G. Moore, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 1985, 46, 277.
15. M. Kirchner, S. Braeutigam, M. Ferm, M. Haas, M. Hangartner, P. Hofschreuder, A. Kasper-Giebel, H. Roemmelt, J. Striedner, L. de Temmerman, W. Terzer, L. Thoeni, H. Werner and R. Zimmerling, to be published.