Development of an international standard for the determination of metals and metalloids in workplace air using ICP-AES: evaluation of sample dissolution procedures through an interlaboratory trial

Abstract

Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) is rapidly overtaking atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) as the method of choice for the determination of toxic metals in workplace air. However, the few ICP-AES methods that have been published are not well characterised in terms of the effectiveness of the sample dissolution procedures described and their validation status. The International Standards Organization (ISO) is currently engaged in developing ISO 15202, which will describe a generic method for the determination of metals and metalloids in airborne particulate matter by ICP-AES. One part of the proposed standard deals with dissolution procedures. The ISO work has been supported by a project carried out in the authors' laboratory to identify, develop and validate sample dissolution procedures for inclusion in the proposed standard. This paper describes an interlaboratory comparison carried out to assess the performance of selected procedures using samples of airborne particulate matter collected on filters with a multiport sampler. Five dissolution procedures were tested. These included an ultrasonic agitation procedure, two hot-plate procedures (based upon NIOSH 7300 and OSHA ID 125G) and two microwave-assisted procedures (based upon EPA 3052). It was shown that the dissolution procedures selected for use in the trial and used internally at HSL generally gave equivalent performance. As expected, a wider spread of results was obtained by participants in the trial. More specifically, there exists some reservation regarding the ability of the ultrasonic and hot-plate procedures to attack fully on a consistent basis some resistant materials, e.g., chromium containing particulate matter. Above all, the trial demonstrated the usefulness of microwave-assisted dissolution procedures in a modern laboratory.

References

1. O. T. Butler and A. M. Howe, ICP-AES Method for Metals in Air: a Critical Review of Published Dissolution Procedures, HSL Internal Report IR/IS/96/02, Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, report available from the authors.
2. O. T. Butler, S. D. Bradley and A. M. Howe, A Revised Dissolution Procedure for the Determination of Nickel and Its Inorganic Compounds Using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, HSL Internal Report IR/L/IS/94/04, Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, report available from the authors.
3. O. T. Butler, S. D. Bradley and A. M. Howe, A Revised Dissolution Procedure for the Determination of Chromium and Its Inorganic Compounds Using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry, HSL Internal Report IR/L/IS/95/12, Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, report available from the authors.
4. O. T. Butler, S. D. Bradley and A. M. Howe, ICP-AES Method for MetalsinAir:Preliminary Testson Bulk Reference Materials to Testthe Effectiveness of the Proposed Sample Dissolution Procedures, HSL Internal Report IR/IS/96/04, Health and Safety Laboratory, Sheffield, report available from the authors.
5. K. Ashley, Electroanalysis, 1995, 7, 1.
6. L. Jalkanen and E. Hasanen, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1996, 11, 365.
7. Metanal Technique Operatoire Standardisée INRS/CRAM, Technique No. 1B, Institut National de Recherche et de Securite, Vandoeuvre, 1993.
8. US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, NIOSH Manualof Analytical Methods, US Government Printing Office, Washington, 4th edn., 1994 DHHS Publication No. 94–113.
9. British Standards Institution, Sampling and Analysis of Welding Fume, BS 6691: Part1, BSI, London, 1986.
10. US Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA. Analytical Methods Manual, USDOL/OSHA, Salt Lake City, 2nd edn., 1991.
11. Health and Safety Executive, Methods for the Determination of Hazardous Substances. MDHS 12/2, Chromium and Inorganic Compounds of Chromiumin Air, 1996. MDHS42/2, Nickeland Inorganic Compounds of Nickelin Air (Except Nickel Carbonyl), 1996. MD HS91, Metalsand Metalloidsin Workplace Airby X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry, 1998. HSE Books, London.
12. A. M. Paudyn and R. G. Smith, Can. J. Appl. Spectrosc., 1992, 37, 230.
13. M. Bettinelli, U. Baroni and N. Pastorelli, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1987, 2, 485.
14. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Office of Solid Waste, Microwave Assisted Acid Digestion of Siliceousand Organically Based Matrices, Method 3052, in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, National Technical Information (NTIS) Service, Springfield, NTIS Order No. PB97-501928INQ, 1995.
15. R. Aksnes, S. Hetland and Y. Thomassen, Quality Assurance of Working Environment Analyses: Interlaboratory Trials—Elements, Norwegian National Institute for the Working Environment, Occupational Hygiene Section, Oslo, 1990, 1992 and 1995(in Norwegian, except for 1990 report, HSE Translation No. 14280F).
16. J. Anglov, E. Holst, S. Dygand and J. M. Christensen, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem., 1993, 345, 335.
17. British Standards Institution, Laboratory Methods for Sampling and Analysis of Particulate Matter Generatedby Arc Welding Consumables, BS7384, BSI, London, 1991.
18. O. T. Butler, unpublisheddata, 1997.
19. International Standards Organization (ISO), Precision of Test Methods—Determination of Repeatability and Reproducibility for a Standard Test Method by Inter-laboratory Tests, ISO 5725, Geneva, 2nd edn., 1986.