An investigation of C–S bond activation in transition metal crown thioether complexes using extended Hückel theory and electrospray mass spectrometry

Abstract

Complexes of Re and Tc with 1,4,7-trithiacyclononane (9S3) differ from their later transition metal analogues in that their d⁶ form ([M(9S3)₂]⁺) undergoes instantaneous C–S bond cleavage yielding ethene and [M(9S3)L]⁺ (L = SCH₂CH₂SCH₂CH₂S), a stable metal(III) thiolate complex, cleanly in aqueous solution. This contrast is interpreted as signifying increased π-back donation by Re and Tc, compared to later metals, into ligand C–S σ* orbitals. In order to validate this hypothesis within an established theoretical framework, and to compare the predicted relative C–S bond lability with relative experimental lability in a series of d⁶ analogues, extended Hückel theory (EHT) was used to investigate the bonding (M = Mo, Tc, Ru, Rh or Pd) while electrospray mass spectrometry (ES-MS) was used to compare ethene loss, in a series of analogous complexes (M = Tc, Re, Ru or Os). The C–S overlap populations were smaller for M = Tc^II and Tc^I than for later metal(II) analogues, and were smaller for Tc^I than for Tc^II. Fragment molecular orbitals corresponding to C–S σ* were more highly populated for M = Tc^II and Tc^I than for later analogues, and also more highly populated for Tc^I than for Tc^II. ES-MS showed that ethene loss from Tc/Re^I and Tc/Re^II complexes occurred at much lower energies than from the Ru/Os^II analogues. EHT supports the hypothesis that C–S activation is caused by π-back donation into C–S σ* orbitals, and correctly predicts that ethene loss occurs more readily from rhenium and technetium d⁵ and especially d⁶ complexes than from later transition metal analogues.

References

1. G. E. D. Mullen, M. J. Went, S. Wocadlo, A. K. Powell and P. J. Blower, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1205.
2. S. K. Ibrahim and C. J. Pickett, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1991, 246; D. Sellmann and W. Reisser, J. Organomet. Chem., 1985, 297, 319; M. Cha, S. C. Shoner and J. A. Kovacs, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 1860; J. T. Goodman and T. B. Rauchfuss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 5017.
3. D. L. Dubois, W. K. Miller and M. Rakowski-Dubois, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 3429; P. J. Blower, J. R. Dilworth, J. P. Hutchinson, T. Nicholson and J. A. Zubieta, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1986, 1339.
4. R. D. Adams, L. Chen and J. H. Yamamoto, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 3704; R. D. Adams, S. B. Falloon and K. McBride, Organometallics, 1995, 14, 1739; S. Rossi, K. Kalinen, J. Pursianen, T. T. Pakkanen and T. A. Pakkanen, J. Organomet. Chem., 1992, 440, 367; R. D. Adams, L. Chen and J. H. Yamamoto, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1995, 229, 47; D. Sellmann, F. Knoch and C. Wronna, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1988, 27, 689.
5. A. J. Blake, A. J. Holder, T. I. Hyde, H.-J. Küppers, M. Schröder, S. Stötzel and K. Wieghardt, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1989, 1600; M. A. Bennett, L. Y. Goh and A. C. Willis, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1979, 32; J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 4984.
6. D. S. Marynick, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 4064; S.-X. Xiao, W. C. Trogler, D. E. Ellis and Z. Berkovitch-Yellin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1983, 105, 7033.
7. A. G. Orpen and N. G. Connelly, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985, 1310.
8. S. R. Cooper and S. C. Rawle, Struct. Bonding (Berlin), 1990, 72, 1; J. Blake and M. Schröder, Adv. Inorg. Chem., 1990, 35, 1.
9. H.-B. Kraatz, H. Jacobsen, T. Ziegler and P. H. Boorman, Organometallics, 1993, 12, 76; J. Giner Planas, M. Hirano and S. Komiya, Chem. Commun., 1999, 1793; S. Harris and R. R. Chianelli, J. Catal., 1984, 86, 400; L. Dong, S. B. Duckett, K. F. Ohman and W. D. Jones, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 151.
10. Data obtained from The Director, Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Rd, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: +44 (0) 1223 336 033; e-mail: deposit@chemcrys.cam.ac.uk).
11. For relevant reviews see: H. C. Friedmann, A. Klein and R. K. Thauer, FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 1990, 87, 339; H. Tops, B. S. Clausen and F. E. Massoth, Hydrotreating Catalysis, Science and Technology, Springer, Berlin, 1996; D. D. Whitehurst, T. Isoda and I. Mochida, Adv. Catal., 1998, 42, 345; K. Tatsumi and H. Kawaguchi, ACS Symp. Ser., 1996, 653, 310.
12. R. Hoffmann, J. M. Howell and E. L. Muetterties, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94, 3047.
13. W. Henderson, B. K. Nicholson and L. J. McCaffrey, Polyhedron, 1998, 17, 4291.
14. W. Henderson, J. S. McIndoe, B. K. Nicholson and P. J. Dyson, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1998, 519.
15. M. G. Ikonomou, A. T. Blades and P. Kebarle, Anal. Chem., 1991, 63, 1989.
16. S. O. C. Matondo, P. Mountford, D. J. Watkin, W. B. Jones and S. R. Cooper, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1995, 161.
17. D. J. White, H.-J. Küppers, A. J. Edwards, D. J. Watkin and S. R. Cooper, Inorg. Chem., 1992, 31, 5351.
18. M. N. Bell, A. J. Blake, M. Schröder, H.-J. Küppers and K. Wieghardt, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1987, 26, 250.
19. J. A. Cabeza and P. M. Maitlis, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1985, 573.
20. M. N. Bell, A. J. Blake, R. M. Christie, R. O. Gould, A. J. Holder, T. I. Hyde, M. Schröder and L. J. Yellowlees, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1992, 2977.
21. Program MEHMACC, U. Häussermann, S. Wengert, R. Nesper and T. F. Fässler, ETH, Zürich, 1993; MEHMACC is based on the extended-Hückel program EHMACC, M.-H. Whangbo, M. Evain, T. Hughbanks, M. Kertes, S. Wijeyesekera, C. Wilker, C. Zheng and R. Hoffmann, 1990 and is available under mehmacc@inorg.chem.ethz.ch.
22. H. Basche, A. Viste and H. B. Gray, J. Chem. Phys., 1966, 44, 10.
23. U. Häussermann, PhD Thesis, ETH, Zürich, 1995.
24. S. Wengert, PhD Thesis, ETH, Zürich, 1997.
25. R. S. Mulliken, J. Chem. Phys., 1955, 23, 1833.
26. Geomview 1.6.1, The Geometry Center, University of Minnesota (http://www.geom.umn.edu). M. Phillips, S. Levy and T. Munzner, Notices of the American Methematical Society (Computers and Mathematics Column), 1993, 40, 985.
27. S. C. Rawle and S. R. Cooper, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1987, 308.