Equilibria and dynamics in binary and ternary uranyl oxalate and acetate/fluoride complexes[hair space]

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Wenche Aas, Zoltán Szabó and Ingmar Grenthe


Abstract

The formation of ternary UO2(ac)pFq2[hair space][hair space]p[hair space][hair space]q ([hair space]p = 1 or 2 and q = 1–3) complexes, and their equilibrium constants were investigated by potentiometric titrations and 19F NMR spectroscopy. The equilibrium constants have been determined from the emf data in a NaClO4 medium at constant sodium concentration, [Na+] = 1.00 M at 25 °C, except for the UO2(ac)F32– complex where 19F NMR at –5 °C was used. The magnitude of the equilibrium constant for the stepwise addition of fluoride indicates that prior co-ordination of acetate has only a small effect on the subsequent bonding of fluoride. The acetate exchange in the ternary UO2(ac)F32– complex was studied using 19F NMR. Through magnetisation transfer experiments, it was possible to confirm the provisional mechanism from a previous study and also the consistency of the rate constants for the five different exchange pathways required to describe the fluoride exchange. The exchange takes place via the intermediate UO2F3(H2O)2, indicating that the acetate exchange follows an interchange mechanism with solvent participation in the transition state. The rates and mechanisms of the ligand exchange reactions in UO2(ox)2(H2O)2– and UO2(ac)2(H2O) have been studied using 13C NMR techniques at –5 °C. The rate law is v = k[complex][ligand], and the second order rate constant and the activation parameters for both systems have been determined. The reactions most likely take place through an Eigen–Wilkins type of mechanism, where the first step is a pre-equilibrium of an outer-sphere complex followed by a rate determining exchange of water. The rate constants for the water exchange reactions are very similar to that in UO2(H2O)52+. The information from the binary oxalate system rules out the formation of UO2(ox)2(H2O)2– as an intermediate in the exchange reactions in the previously studied UO2(ox)2F3–, also in this case confirming a previously suggested exchange mechanism. The H+/D+ isotope effects and a linear free energy relationship suggest that the main catalytic effect of H+ on ligand exchange rates is due to the formation of a protonated precursor. Hence, the catalytic effect depends on the basicity of the ligand and the site for the proton attack.


References

  1. Z. Szabó, J. Glaser and I. Grenthe, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 2036 CrossRef CAS.
  2. Z. Szabó, W. Aas and I. Grenthe, Inorg. Chem., 1997, 36, 5369 CrossRef CAS.
  3. Z. Szabó and I. Grenthe, Inorg. Chem., 1998, 37, 6214 CrossRef CAS.
  4. M. Harada, Y. Fujii, S. Sakamaki and H. Tomiyasu, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1992, 65, 3022 CAS.
  5. W. Aas, A. Moukhamet-Galeev and I. Grenthe, Radiochim. Acta, 1998, 82, 77 CAS.
  6. L. Ciavatta, D. Ferri, I. Grenthe and F. Salvatore, Inorg. Chem., 1981, 20, 463 CrossRef CAS.
  7. H. M. Irving, M. G. Miles and L. D. Pettit, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1967, 38, 475 CrossRef CAS.
  8. A. Liberti and M. Mascini, Anal. Chem., 1969, 41, 676 CrossRef CAS.
  9. L. G. Sillén and B. Warnquist, Ark. Kemi, 1969, 31, 315 Search PubMed.
  10. A. L. V. Geet, Anal. Chem., 1970, 42, 679 CrossRef CAS.
  11. Z. Szabó and J. Glaser, Magn. Reson. Chem., 1995, 33, 20 CAS.
  12. S. Ahrland and L. Kullberg, Acta Chem. Scand., 1971, 25, 3677 CAS.
  13. S. Ahrland and L. Kullberg, Acta Chem. Scand., 1971, 25, 3457 CAS.
  14. W. H. Zachariasen and H. A. Plettinger, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. C, 1959, 12, 526 Search PubMed.
  15. P. Hurwitz and K. Kustin, J. Phys. Chem., 1967, 71, 324 CrossRef.
  16. N. W. Alcock, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1973, 1614 RSC.
  17. N. W. Alcock, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1973, 1610 RSC.
  18. M. Eigen and R. G. Wilkins, Adv. Chem. Ser., 1965, 49, 55 Search PubMed.
  19. Y. Ikeda, H. Tomiyasu and H. Fukutomi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1984, 57, 2925 CAS.
  20. L. Rodehüser, P. R. Rubini, K. Bokolo and J.-J. Delpuech, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 1061 CrossRef CAS.
  21. Y. Ikeda, H. Tomiyasu and H. Fukutomi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1983, 56, 1060 CAS.
  22. R. M. Fouss, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1958, 80, 5050 CrossRef.
  23. I. Bányai, I. Farkas, I. Grenthe and Z. Szabó, in preparation.
  24. I. Bányai, J. Glaser, K. Micskei, I. Tóth and L. Zékány, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 3785 CrossRef CAS.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.