NMR studies on hydrophobic interactions in solution Part 4. Temperature and concentration dependence of the hydrophobic self-association of tert-butanol in water

Abstract

The hydrophobic self-association of tert-butanol was investigated in binary aqueous mixtures at 10, 25 and 40°C by the application of NMR techniques. The association tendency of the organic compound was monitored using the so-called (self)-association parameter A₂₂ obtained by means of the measurement of intermolecular ¹H–¹H dipole–dipole relaxation rates of the methyl protons and of self-diffusion coefficients of tert-butanol molecules. The composition dependence of A₂₂ shows that the self-association of tert-butanol increases with dilution and reaches a maximum at a concentration of about 2–3 mol% at 25°C. At lower concentrations a decrease is observed. The concentration corresponding to the maximum of A₂₂ can be viewed as a transition point separating the tert-butanol concentration range (within the water-rich domain) in two regions, the low concentration region being dominated by single hydrophobically hydrated tert-butanol molecules whereas the high concentration region is characterised by microstructures where tert-butanol molecules are hydrophobically associated. With increasing temperature the association tendency is enhanced and the A₂₂ maximum is shifted to lower tert-butanol concentrations, diminishing the extent of the hydrophobic hydration region. The occurrence of two structurally different regions is discussed in the light of literature results from other methods.

References

1. A. Sacco, A. Asciolla, E. Matteoli and M. Holz, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1996, 92, 35.
2. A. Sacco and M. Holz, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1997, 93, 1101.
3. A. Sacco, F. M. De Cillis and M. Holz, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1998, 94, 2089.
4. D. F. Evans and B. W. Ninham, J. Phys. Chem., 1986, 90, 226.
5. P. L. Privalov and S. J. Gill, Adv. Protein Chem., 1988, 39, 191.
6. K. A. Dill, Biochemistry, 1990, 29, 7133.
7. H. G. Hertz, A. Kratochwill and H. Weingärtner, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Chem. Sci.), 1985, 94, 337.
8. K. J. Müller and H. G. Hertz, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 1256.
9. M. D. Zeidler, Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem., 1965, 69, 659.
10. E. O. Stejskal and J. E. Tanner, J. Chem. Phys., 1965, 42, 288.
11. Y. Koga, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 5172.
12. K. Mizuno, T. Ochi, S. Shimada, Y. Nishimura, S. Maeda and Y. Koga, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 1999, 1, 133.
13. M. d'Angelo, G. Onoro and A. Santuci, J. Chem. Phys., 1994, 100, 3107.
14. E. Matteoli and L. Lepori, J. Chem. Phys., 1984, 80, 2856.
15. A. Ben-Naim, J. Chem. Phys., 1977, 67, 4884.
16. K. R. Harris and P. J. Newitt, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102(44), 8874.