On the STM imaging contrast of graphite: towards a “true’' atomic resolution

Abstract

Different phenomena observed in the high-resolution images of graphite by scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) or atomic force microscopy (AFM) such as the asymmetry in the charge density of neighboring carbon atoms in a hexagon, the high corrugation amplitudes and the apparent absence of point defects has led to a controversial discussion since the first published STM images of graphite. Different theoretical concepts and hypotheses have been developed to explain these phenomena. Despite these efforts a generally accepted interpretation is still lacking. In this paper we discuss a possible imaging mechanism based on mechanical considerations. Forces acting between tip and sample are taken into account to explain the image contrast. We present for the first time a direct atomic resolution of the graphite hexagonal structure by transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), revealing the expected hexagonal array of atoms and the existence of several types of defects. We discuss the possibility that the STM image of graphite is a result of convolution of the electronic properties and the atomic hardness of graphite.

References

1. A. Selloni, P. Carnevali, E. Tosatti and C. D. Chen, Phys. Rev., B, 1985, 31, 2602.
2. G. Binnig, H. Fuchs, C. Gerber, H. Rohrer, E. Stoll and E. Tosatti, Europhys. Lett., 1986, 1, 31.
3. S.-I. Park and C. F. Quate, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1986, 48, 112.
4. G. Binnig, H. Rohrer, C. Gerber and E. Weibel, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1982, 49, 57.
5. H. J. Mamin, E. Ganz, D. W. Abraham, R. E. Thomson and J. Clarke, Phys. Rev., B, 1986, 34, 9015.
6. R. Wiesendanger and D. Anselmetti, in Scanning Tunneling Microscopy I, ed. H.-J. Güntherodt and R. Wiesendanger, Springer, Berlin, 1992, vol. 1, p. 131.
7. H. A. Mizes, S.-I. Park and W. A. Harrison, Phys. Rev., B, 1987, 36, 4491.
8. K. Kobayashi and M. Tsukada, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A, 1990, 8, 170.
9. F. Atamny and A. Baiker, Appl. Catal. A, 1998, 173, 201.
10. D. Tomanek, S. G. Louie, H. J. Mamin, D. W. Abraham, R. E. Thompson, E. Ganz and J. Clarke, Phys. Rev., B, 1987, 35, 7790.
11. D. Tomanek and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev., B, 1988, 37, 8327.
12. J. Tersoff, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1986, 57, 440.
13. A. L. Tchougreeff and R. Hoffmann, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 8993.
14. The site asymmetry A is defined, according to Tomanek et al. (Phys. Rev. B, 1987, 35, 7790), as A=[I(B)–I(A)]/[I(B)+I(A)] : where I(A) is the tunneling current at A sites and I(B) at B sites. The tunneling current is expressed by Tersoff and Hamann (Phys. Rev. Lett., 1983, 50, 1998, Phys. Rev. B, 1985, 31, 805) as p∼I, where p is the local density of states.
15. J. Tersoff and D. R. Hamann, Phys. Rev., B, 1985, 31, 805.
16. M.-H. Whangbo, W. Liang, J. Ren, S. N. Magonov and A. Wawkuschewski, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 7602.
17. K. H. Lee, M. Causa and S. S. Park, J. Phys. Chem., B, 1998, 102, 6020.
18. T. A. Land, T. Michely, R. J. Behm, J. C. Hemminger and G. Consa, Surf. Sci., 1992, 264, 261.
19. S. P. Kelty and C. M. Lieber, Phys. Rev., B, 1989, 40, 5856.
20. S. P. Kelty and C. M. Lieber, J. Phys. Chem., 1989, 93, 5983.
21. D. Anselmetti, V. Geiser, D. Brodbeck, G. Overney, R. Wiesendanger and H.-J. Güntherodt, Synth. Met., 1990, 38, 157.
22. M. Kuwabara, D. R. Clarke and D. A. Smith, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1990, 56, 2396.
23. J. M. Soler, A. M. Baro, N. Garcia and H. Rohrer, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1986, 57, 444.
24. C. M. Mate, R. Erlandsson, G. M. McClelland and S. Chiang, Surf. Sci., 1989, 208, 473.
25. M. Salmeron, D. F. Ogletree, C. Ocal, H. C. Wang, G. Neubauer, W. Kolbe and G. Meyers, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B, 1991, 9, 1347.
26. J. B. Pethica, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1986, 57, 3235.
27. I. P. Batra, N. Garcia, H. Rohrer, H. Salemink, E. Stoll and S. Ciraci, Surf. Sci., 1987, 181, 126.
28. D. P. E. Smith, G. Binnig and C. F. Quate, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1986, 49, 1166.
29. R. Schlögl, in Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, ed. G. Ertl, H. Knözinger and J. Weitkamp, VCH, Weinheim, 1997, vol. 1, p. 138.
30. U. Müller, Inorganic Structural Chemistry, Wiley, New York, 1993.
31. S. A. Gould, K. Burke and P. K. Hansma, Phys. Rev., B, 1989, 40, 5363.
32. I. P. Batra and S. Ciraci, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A, 1988, 6, 313.
33. F. Abraham and I. P. Batra, Surf. Sci., 1989, 209, L125.
34. T. R. Albrecht and C. F. Quate, J. Appl. Phys., 1987, 62, 2599.
35. T. R. Albrecht, M. M. Dovek, M. D. Kirk, C. A. Lang, C. F. Quate and D. P. E. Smith, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1989, 55, 1727.
36. B. Parkinson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 7498.
37. E. Delawski and B. A. Parkinson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 1661.
38. O. M. Leung and M. C. Goh, Science, 1992, 255, 64.
39. H. Hiura, T. W. Ebbesen, J. Fujita, K. Tanigaki and T. Takada, Nature, 1994, 367, 148.
40. T. W. Ebbesen and H. Hiura, Adv. Mater., 1995, 7, 582.
41. H. V. Roy, C. Kallinger and K. Sattler, Surf. Sci., 1998, 407, 1.
42. H.-V. Roy, C. Kallinger, B. Marsen and K. Sattler, J. Appl. Phys., 1998, 83, 4695.
43. T. M. Bernhardt, B. Kaiser and K. Rademann, Surf. Sci., 1998, 408, 86.
44. G. Binnig, Specul. Sci. Technol., 1987, 10, 345.
45. Z. Y. Rong, Phys. Rev., B, 1994, 50, 1839.
46. A. Tracz, A. A. Kalachev, G. Wegner and J. P. Rabe, Langmuir, 1995, 11, 2840.
47. G. Bräuchle, S. Richard-Schneider, D. Illig, J. Rockenberger, R. D. Beck and M. M. Kappes, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1995, 67, 52.
48. R. T. Yang, in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, ed. P. A. Thrower, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1984, vol. 19, p. 163.
49. H. Chang and A. J. Bard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 4598.
50. H. Chang and A. J. Bard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 5588.
51. B. Henschke, H. Schubert, J. Blöcker, F. Atamny and R. Schlögl, Thermochim Acta, 1994, 234, 53.
52. M. R. Soto, J. Microsc., 1988, 152, 779.
53. H. A. Mizes and W. A. Harrison, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., A, 1988, 6, 300.
54. M. R. Soto, Surf. Sci., 1990, 225, 190.
55. H. A. Mizes and J. S. Foster, Science, 1989, 244, 559.
56. N. Takeuchi, J. Valenzuela-Benavides and L. M. d. l. Garza, Surf. Sci., 1997, 380, 190.
57. J. Valenzuela-Benavides and L. M. d. l. Garza, Surf. Sci., 1995, 330, 227.
58. F. Ohnesorge and G. Binnig, Science, 1993, 260, 1451.
59. J. H. Coombs and J. B. Pethica, IBM J. Res. Dev., 1986, 30, 455.
60. H. P. Lang, V. Thommen-Geiser, C. Bolm, M. Felder, J. Frommer, R. Wiesendanger, H. Werner, R. Schlögl, A. Zahab, P. Bernier, G. Gerth, D. Anselmetti and H.-J. Güntherodt, Appl. Phys., A, 1993, 56, 197.
61. S. Behler, H. P. Lang, S. H. Pan, V. Thommen-Geiser and H.-J. Güntherodt, Z. Phys., B, 1993, 91, 1.
62. X. Yao, T. G. Ruskell, R. K. Workman, D. Sarid and D. Chen, Surf. Sci., 1996, 367, L85.
63. M. Ge and K. Sattler, Science, 1993, 260, 515.
64. J. W. G. Wildöer, L. C. Venema, A. G. Rinzler, R. E. Smalley and C. Dekker, Nature, 1998, 391, 59.
65. T. A. Odom, J.-L. Huang, P. Kim and C. M. Lieber, Nature, 1998, 391, 62.
66. H. Beyer, M. Müller and T. Schimmel, Appl. Phys., A, 1999, 68, 163.
67. L. C. Venema, J. W. G. Wildöer, J. W. Janssen, S. J. Tans, H. L. J. T. Tuistra, L. P. Kouwenhoven and C. Dekker, Science, 1999, 283, 52.
68. L. C. Venema, J. W. G. Wildöer, C. Dekker, G. A. Rinzler and R. E. Smalley, Appl. Phys., A, 1998, 66, 153.