The transition state of electrophilic aromatic substitution in the gas phase

Abstract

Electrophilic aromatic substitution without solvent molecules is a one-step reaction. This is the result of an MP2/6-31+G** analysis of the benzene–HF–BF₃ supermolecule. There is a qualitative agreement of this with an estimation given by Tomasi etal. in 1997 (Theoret. Chim. Acta, 1977, 45, 127). We report the structures of the BF₃–HF–benzene complex and the degenerate C_s transition structures of the H exchange. However, considering the zero-point vibrational energies in order to get Δ^‡H°(0), a broad transition state region including the C_2v structure becomes evident. It demonstrates the large out-of-plane mobility of the reaction cycle. The cationic subunits of the zwitterionic transition structures resembles the well-known σ-complex structure. It is shown that the prolongation of the C–H bonds at the protonated C atom of benzene may lead to a small HCH angle and a transcyclic H···H bonding in the transition structure.

References

1. W. Klatt, Z. Anorg. Allgem. Chemie, 1937, 234, 189.
2. (a) R. T. Morrison and R. N. Boyd, Lehrbuch der Organischen Chemie, 3rd edn., VCH, Weinheim, 1986; (b) H. R. Christen and F. Vögtle, Organische Chemie, vol. 1, Verlage Salle und Sauerländer, Frankfurt/Main, 1992; (c) F. A. Cotton and G. Wilkinson, Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 5th edn., Wiley, New York, 1988, p. 175.
3. (a) G. A. Olah, R. H. Schlosberg, D. P. Kelly and Gh. D. Mateescu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1970, 92, 2546; (b) G. A. Olah, R. H. Schlosberg, R. D. Porter, Y. K. Mo, D. P. Kelly and G. D. Mateescu, ibid., 1972, 94, 2034.
4. M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, J. R. Cheeseman, M. A. Robb, T. Keith, G. A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y. Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez and J. A. Pople, GAUSSIAN 94, Revision D.4.
5. (a) D. Heidrich, N. J. R. van Eikema Hommes and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem., 1993, 14, 1149; (b) N. J. R. van Eikema Hommes, D. Heidrich and P. v. R. Schleyer, to be submitted.
6. D. Heidrich, J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM), 1998, 429, 87.
7. L. A. Curtiss, K. Raghavachari and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys., 1992, 98, 1293.
8. (a) D. Heidrich and M. Grimmer, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 1975, 9, 923; (b) D. Heidrich, P. Hobza, P. Čarsky and R. Zahradnik, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun., 1978, 43, 3020.
9. (a) W. C. Ermler, R. S. Mulliken and E. Clementi, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1976, 98, 388; (b) H.-J. Köhler and H. Lischka, ibid., 1979, 101, 3479; (c) S. Sieber and P. v. R. Schleyer, ibid., 1993, 115, 5987 and references therein.
10. F. Cacace, Acc. Chem. Res., 1988, 21, 215.
11. S. Fornarini and M. E. Crestoni, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 827.
12. W. Jakubetz and P. Schuster, Tetrahedron, 1971, 27, 101.
13. G. Alagona, E. Scrocco, E. Silla and J. Tomasi, Theoret. Chim. Acta, 1977, 45, 127.
14. D. Heidrich, M. Rückert and H.-J. Köhler, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1987, 136, 13.
15. J. A. Phillips, M. Canagaratna, H. Goodfried, A. Grushow, J. Almlöf and K. R. Leopold, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 12 549.
16. (a) L. W. Beck, T. Xu, J. B. Nicholas and J. F. Haw, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 11594; (b) T. Mildner and D. Freude, J. Catal., 1998, 178, 309.
17. Th. N. Truong, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101, 2750.
18. Yu. A. Borisov, Yu. A. Zolotarev, E. V. Laskatelev and N. F. Myasoedov, Isv. Ak. Nauk, Ser. Chim (Russ.), 1996, 1852.
19. A. E. Reed, R. B. Weinstock and F. Weinhold, Chem. Rev., 1988, 88, 899 GAUSSIAN NBO version 3.1.
20. G. Schüürmann and D. Heidrich, in preparation.