Simulation of amphiphilic mesophases using dissipative particle dynamics

Abstract

We study a dense solution of an amphiphilic species using the dissipative particle dynamics (DPD) algorithm, focussing on the smectic mesophase. Since DPD is locally momentum-conserving, it gives at large length scales a faithful representation of the isothermal hydrodynamics of the system. Results are presented for the phase diagram of a minimal amphiphile model, consisting of rigid AB dimers in a solution of C monomers, for the coarsening dynamics of a polydomain smectic phase, and for the formation of a monodomain smectic when shear is applied.

References

1. See, e.g., R. G. Larson and P. T. Mather, in Theoretical Challenges in the Dynamics of Complex Fluids, ed. T. C. B. McLeish, NATO ASI Series E, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997, vol. 339.
2. G. Gompper and M. Schick, Self-Assembling Amphiphilic Systems, Academic Press, New York, 1994.
3. R. G. Larson, J. Phys. II, 1996, 6, 1441.
4. B. Smit, K. Esselink, P. A. J. Hilbers, N. M. van Os and I. Szleifer, Langmuir, 1993, 9, 9.
5. P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals, Clarendon, Oxford, 1993.
6. F. Nallet, D. Roux and J. Prost, J. Phys., 1989, 50, 3147.
7. P. J. Hoogerbrugge and J. M. V. A. Koelman, Europhys. Lett., 1992, 19, 155.
8. P. Español and P. B. Warren, Europhys. Lett., 1995, 30, 191 Note that the original algorithm of ref. 7 did not implement the fluctuation–dissipation theorem correctly.
9. R. D. Groot and P. B. Warren, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 107, 4423.
10. P. B. Warren, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci., 1998, 3, 620.
11. E. S. Boek, P. V. Coveney, H. N. W. Lekkerkerker and P. van der Schoot, Phys. Rev. E, 1997, 55, 3124; A. G. Schlijper, P. J. Hoogebrugge and C. W. Manke, J. Rheol., 1995, 39, 567.
12. S. I. Jury, P. Bladon, S. Krishna and M. E. Cates, Phys. Rev. E., submitted.
13. R. D. Groot and T. J. Madden, J. Chem. Phys., 1998, 108, 875; R. D. Groot, T. J. Madden and D. J. Tildesley, J. Chem. Phys., accepted for publication.
14. B. M. Boghosian, P. V. Coveney and A. N. Emerton, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A, 1996, 453, 1221; O. Thiessen, G. Gompper and D. M. Kroll, Europhys. Lett., 1998, 42, 419; G. Gonnella, E. Orlandini and J. M. Yeomans, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, 78, 1695.
15. W. Schroeder, K. Martin and B. Lorensen, The Visualisation Toolkit, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.
16. D. J. Mitchell, G. J. T. Tiddy, L. Waring, T. Bostock and M. P. McDonald, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1, 1983, 79, 975.
17. R. G. Laughlin, The Aqueous Phase Behavior of Surfactants, Academic Press, New York, 1994.
18. If one considers the scattering object to be a bilayer rather than particles then S(k) becomes the product of a structure factor for the smectic and a form factor for the bilayer. The latter, though not the former, strongly depends on the contrast chosen.
19. M. E. Cates and S. T. Milner, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1989, 62, 1856.
20. C. R. Safinya and R. F. Bruinsma, Phys. Rev. A, 1991, 43, 5377.
21. G. H. Fredrickson and F. S. Bates, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 1996, 26, 501.
22. O. Diat, D. Roux and F. Nallet, J. Phys. II, 1993, 3, 1427.
23. P. Panizza, P. Archambault and D. Roux, J. Phys. II, 1995, 5, 303.