Escape transition of a polymer chain: Phenomenological theory and Monte Carlo simulations

Abstract

The escape transition of a polymer mushroom (i.e., a flexible polymer chain of length N end-grafted onto a flat repulsive surface), occurring when a piston of radius R which is much larger than the size of the mushroom (R₀≈aN^ν, here a is the segment length and ν≈3/5) but much smaller than the linearly stretched chain (R_max=aN), compresses the polymer to height H, is investigated for good solvent conditions. We argue that in the limit of N→∞ a sharp first-order type transition emerges, characterized in the isotherm force fvs. height H by a flat region from H_esc,t=Ĥ₁[N/(R/a)]^ν/(1-ν) to H_imp,t=Ĥ₂[N/(R/a)]^ν/(1-ν), with (Ĥ₂-Ĥ₁)/Ĥ₁≈0.26.

Monte Carlo methods are developed (combining configurational bias methods with pivot- and random-hopping moves) which allow the study of this transition for chain lengths up to N=1024. It is found that even for such long chains the transition is still slightly rounded. The expected scaling of the transition heights with N and R is nevertheless verified. We show that the transition shows up via a double-peak structure of the radial distribution function of the monomers underneath the piston.

References

1. P. G. de Gennes, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 1987, 27, 187.
2. S. T. Milner, Science, 1991, 905, 251.
3. A. Halperin, M. Tirrell and T. P. Lodge, Adv. Polym. Sci., 1992, 100, 33.
4. M. C. Woodle and D. D. Lasic, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1992, 1113, 171.
5. T. L. Kuhl, D. E. Leckband, D. D. Lasic and J. N. Israelachvili, Biopys. J., 1994, 66, 1479.
6. G. Subramanian, D. R. M. Williams and P. A. Pincus, Europhys. Lett., 1995, 29, 285.
7. D. R. M. Williams and F. C. MacKintosh, J. Phys. II, 1995, 5, 1407.
8. G. Subramanian, D. R. M. Williams and P. A. Pincus, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 4045.
9. M. C. Guffond, D. R. M. Williams and E. M. Sevick, Langmuir, 1997, 13, 5691.
10. J. Jimenez and R. Rajagopalan, Langmuir, 1998, 14, 2598.
11. K. Binder, in Computational Methods in Field Theory, ed. by H. Gausterer and C. B. Lang, Springer, Berlin, 1992, p. 59.
12. P. G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics, Cornell University Press, Ithaca NY, 1979.
13. B. Nienhuis, J. Stat. Phys., 1984, 34, 731.
14. P. Pincus, Macromolecules, 1976, 9, 387.
15. J. C. Le Guillou and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. B: Solid State, 1980, 21, 3976.
16. I. Gerroff, A. Milchev, W. Paul and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 98, 6526.
17. A. Milchev, W. Paul and K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys., 1993, 99, 4786.
18. A. Milchev, W. Paul and K. Binder, Macromol. Theory Simul., 1994, 3, 915.
19. V. Yamakov, A. Milchev and K. Binder, J. Phys. II, 1997, 7, 1123.
20. A. Milchev and K. Binder, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 343.
21. A. Milchev and K. Binder, J. Phys. II, 1996, 6, 21.
22. K. Binder, A. Milchev and J. Baschnagel, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 1996, 26, 107.
23. A. Milchev, W. Paul and K. Binder, Macromol. Theory Simul., 1994, 3, 305.
24. R. B. Pandey, A. Milchev and K. Binder, Macromolecules, 1997, 30, 1194.
25. A. Milchev and K. Binder, Eur. Phys. J. B, 1998, 3, 477.
26. V. Yamakov and A. Milchev, Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top., 1997, 55, 1704.
27. V. Yamakov and A. Milchev, Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids, Relat. Interdiscip. Top., 1997, 56, 7043.
28. N. Madras and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat. Phys., 1988, 50, 109.
29. S. D. Stellmann and P. J. Gans, Macromolecules, 1972, 5, 516.
30. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Application, Academic Press, New York, 1996, pp. 292–300.
31. M. N. Rosenbluth and A. W. Rosenbluth, J. Chem. Phys., 1955, 23, 356.
32. A. Milchev, M. Müller, V. Yamakov and K. Binder, in preparation.