An Al₁₂R₈^– cluster as an intermediate on the way from aluminium(I) compounds to aluminium metal†

Abstract

A new Al₁₂ cluster resembling a small section of the aluminium lattice has been prepared by the reaction of AlCl solution with LiN(SiMe₃)₂.

References

1. C. Dohmeier, D. Loos and H. Schnöckel, Angew. Chem., 1996, 108, 141; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 129.
2. C. Dohmeier, R. Robel, M. Tacke and H. Schnöckel, Angew. Chem., 1991, 103, 594; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 564.
3. A. Ecker, E. Weckert and H. Schnöckel, Nature, 1997, 387, 379.
4. A. Purath, R. Köppe and H. Schnöckel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., in press.
5. N. Wiberg, T. Blank, H. Nöth and W. Ponikwar, Angew. Chem., 1999, 111, 887; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 839.
6. Ab initio calculations have been performed using: (a) Turbomole: O. Treutler and R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys., 1995, 102, 346; (b) Functional BP86: A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A, 1998, 38, 3098; J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B., 1996, 33, 8822; (c) RIDFT: K. Eichhorn, O. Treutler, H. Öhm, M. Häser and R. Ahlrichs, Chem. Phys. Lett., 1995, 242, 652; K. Eichkorn, F. Weigend, O. Treutler and R. Ahlrichs, Theor. Chem. Acc., 1997, 97, 119.
7. For the radical anion Al₁₂(NH₂)_s^– most of the calculated Al–Al distances are very close to those of1. A complete accordance with the experimentally determined structural data can not be expected since the NH₂ ligand is different from the N(SiMe₃)₂ group for the following reasons. (a) The N atom in the NH₂ group is pyramidally coordinated whereas a planar surrounding is observed for the N(SiMe₃)₂ groups. (b) The orientation of the NR₂ groups towards the Al₁₂ core should be different for both amide groups for steric reasons and therefore a different interaction of the lone pair of the N atom with the Al₁₂ core can be expected. In order to save computing time a symmetry restriction (S₄) was applied for the Al₁₂(NH₂)₈ species. The electron affinity for the process Al₁₂(NH₂)₈→ Al₁₂(NH₂)₈^– has been calculated to be exothermic by –145 kJ mol^–1.
8. W. Hiller, K.-W. Klinkhammer, W. Uhl and J. Wagner, Angew. Chem., 1991, 103, 182 (Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 179).
9. C. Klemp, R. Köppe, E. Wecker and H. Schnöckel, Angew. Chem., 1999, 111, 1852; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 1740.
10. F. A. Cotton, Quart. Rev. Chem. Soc., 1966, 389.