Direct NMR and luminescence observation of water exchange at cationic ytterbium and europium centres

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Andrei S. Batsanov, Andrew Beeby, James I. Bruce, Judith A. K. Howard, Alan M. Kenwright and David Parker


Abstract

Cationic chiral Yb and Eu tetra-amide complexes, have been studied by VT NMR, luminescence and crystallography: the rate of dissociation of water is about 500 times faster at Yb than at the square antiprismatic Eu centre.


References

  1. D. H. Powell, O. M. Ni Dhubhghaill, D. Pubanz, L. Helm, Y. S. Lebedev, W. Schlaepfer and A. E. Merbach, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 9333 CrossRef CAS.
  2. G. Gonzàles, D. H. Powell, V. Tissierès and A. E. Merbach, Inorg. Chem., 1994, 32, 3844; D. Pubanz, G. Gonzalez, D. H. Powell and A. E. Merbach, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 4457.
  3. S. Aime, A. Barge, M. Botta, A. S. de Sousa and D. Parker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 4767 CrossRef CAS.
  4. R. S. Dickins, J. A. K. Howard, C. L. Maupin, J. M. Moloney, D. Parker, J. P. Riehl, G. Siligardi and J. A. G. Williams, Chem. Eur. J., 1999, 5, 1095 CrossRef CAS.
  5. S. Aime, A. Barge, M. Botta, A. S. De Sousa and D. Parker, Angew. Chem. Int., Ed., 1998, 37, 2673 CrossRef CAS.
  6. S. Aime, A. S. Batsanov, M. Botta, R. S. Dickins, S. Faulkner, C. E. Foster, A. Harrison, J. A. K. Howard, J. M. Moloney, T. J. Norman, D. Parker, L. Royle and J. A. G. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1997, 3623 RSC.
  7. The T–2 temperature dependence of the chemical shift of the bound water resonance (2.9 Å from Yb) is an approximation, as it assumes that the contact shift (varying as T–1) is not significant. Earlier work has shown that a T–2 dependence represents a good approximation (valid to ±10%) for the dipolar term: B. McGarvey, J. Magn. Reson., 1979, 33, 445 Search PubMed and references therein. The most shifted axial ring proton (3.5 Å from the Yb centre), resonating at δ 108 at 293 K (CD3OD), showed a T–2 dependence of its chemical shift.
  8. Crystal data for C46H66N8O5Yb(CF3SO3)3.3H2O: M= 1509.29, monoclinic, space group P21; a= 14.390(1), b= 11.928(1), c= 19.300(1)Å; β= 102.67°, U= 3232.1(4)Å3, Dc= 1.551 g cm–3, λ(Mo-Kα)= 0.71073 Å, Z= 2, µ= 1.640 mm–1. Data were collected on a SMART at 120(2) K. Refinement of 999 parameters by full matrix least squares on F2(SHELX96) converged at R= 0.021, wR2= 0.051 for 16442 observed reflections with I > 2σ(I). The disordered phenyl ring in the structure was isotropically refined with two sets of partially occupied atoms. CCDC 182/1231. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cc/1999/1011/ for crystallographic files in .cif format.
  9. M. Woods, J. A. K. Howard, A. M. Kenwright, J. M. Moloney, D. Parker, M. Navet and O. Rousseau, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1381 RSC.
  10. I. N. Polyakova, T. A. Senina, T. N. Polynova and M. A. Porai-Koshits, Koord. Khim., 1983, 9, 1131 Search PubMed Yb–OH2= 2.41 Å.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.