Comparison of formats for the development of fiber-optic biosensors utilizing sol–gel derived materials entrapping fluorescently-labelled protein

Abstract

The development of fiber-optic biosensors requires that a biorecognition element and a fluorescent reporter group be immobilized at or near the surface of an optical element such as a planar waveguide or optical fiber. In this study, we examined a model biorecognition element–reporter group couple consisting of human serum albumin that was site-selectively labelled at Cys 34 with iodoacetoxy-nitrobenzoxadiazole (HSA–NBD). The labelled protein was encapsulated into sol–gel derived materials that were prepared either as monoliths, as beads that were formed at the distal tip of a fused silica optical fiber, or as thin films that were dipcast along the length of a glass slide or optical fiber. For fiber-based studies, the entrapped protein was excited using a helium–cadmium laser that was launched into a single optical fiber, and emission was separated from the incident radiation using a perforated mirror beam-splitter, and detected using a monochromator–photomultiplier tube assembly. Changes in fluorescence intensity were generated by denaturant-induced conformational changes in the protein or by iodide quenching. The analytical parameters of merit for the different encapsulation formats, including minimum protein loading level, response time and limit-of-detection, were examined, as were factors such as protein accessibility, leaching and photobleaching. Overall, the results indicated that both beads and films were suitable for biosensor development. In both formats, a substantial fraction of the entrapped protein remained accessible, and the entrapped protein retained a large degree of conformational flexibility. Thin films showed the most rapid response times, and provided good detection limits for a model analyte. However, the entrapment of proteins into beads at the distal tip of fibers provided better signal-to-noise and signal-to-background ratios, and required less protein for preparation. Hence, beads appear to be the most viable method for interfacing of proteins to optical fibers.

References

1. J. D. Brennan, Appl. Spectrosc., 1999, 53, 106A.
2. (a) L. M. Ellerby, C. R. Nishida, F. Nishida, S. A. Yamanaka, B. Dunn, J. Selverstone Valentine and J. I. Zink, Science(Washington, D.C.), 1992, 255, 1113; (b) B. C. Dave, B. Dunn, J. S. Valentine and J. I. Zink, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66, 1120A.
3. (a) S. Braun, S. Rappoport, R. Zusman, D. Avnir and M. Ottolenghi, Mater. Lett., 1990, 10, 1; (b) D. Avnir, S. Braun, O. Lev and M. Ottolenghi, Chem. Mater., 1994, 6, 1605.
4. (a) R. Wang, U. Narang, P. N. Prasad and F. V. Bright, Anal. Chem., 1993, 65, 2671; (b) A. Turniansky, D. Avnir, A. Bronshtein, N. Aharonson and M. Altstein, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 1996, 7, 135; (c) J. Livage, C. Roux, J. M. Da Costa, I. Desportes and J. F. Quinson, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 1996, 7, 45; (d) A. Bronshtein, N. Aharonson, D. Avnir, A. Turniansky and M. Altstein, Chem. Mater., 1997, 9, 2632.
5. F. Nishida, J. M. McKiernan, B. Dunn, J. I. Zink, C. J. Brinker and A. J. Hurd, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1995, 78, 1640.
6. (a) L. Zheng, W. R. Reid and J. D. Brennan, Anal. Chem., 1997, 69, 3940; (b) P. L. Edmiston, C. L. Wambolt, M. K. Smith and S. S. Saavedra, J. Collord. Interface Sci., 1994, 163, 395.
7. J. D. Jordan, R. A. Dunbar and F. V. Bright, Anal. Chem., 1995, 67, 2436.
8. (a) L. Zheng and J. D. Brennan, Analyst, 1998, 123, 1735; (b) C. L. Wambolt and S. S. Saavedra, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 1996, 7, 53.
9. C. Shen and N. M. Kostic, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 1304.
10. (a) J. M. Miller, B. Dunn, J. S. Valentine and J. I. Zink, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1996, 220, 279; (b) Z. Chen, D. L. Kaplan, K. Yang, J. Kumar, K. A. Marx and S. K. Tripathy, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 1996, 7, 99.
11. (a) S. Braun, S. Shtelzer, S. Rappoport, D. Avnir and M. Ottolenghi, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 1992, 147, 739; (b) S. Wu, L. M. Ellerby, J. S. Cohan, B. Dunn, M. A. El-Sayed, J. S. Valentine and J. I. Zink, Chem. Mater., 1993, 5, 115; (c) U. Narang, P. N. Prasad, F. V. Bright, K. Ramanathan, N. D. Kumar, B. D. Malhotra, M. N. Kamalasanan and S. Chandra, Anal. Chem., 1994, 66, 3139; (d) U. Narang, P. N. Prasad, F. V. Bright, K. Kumar, N. D. Kumar, B. D. Malhotra, M. N. Kamalasanan and S. Chandra, Chem. Mater., 1994, 6, 1596; (e) S. A. Yamanaka, B. Dunn, J. S. Valentine and J. I. Zink, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 9095; (f) D. J. Blyth, J. W. Aylott, D. J. Richardson and D. A. Russell, Analyst, 1995, 120, 2725; (g) J. S. Lundgren and F. V. Bright, Anal. Chem., 1996, 68, 3377; (h) J. W. Aylott, D. J. Richardson and D. A. Russell, Analyst, 1997, 122, 77; (i) F. Akbarian, A. Lin, B. Dunn, J. S. Valentine and J. I. Zink, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 1997, 8, 1067; (j) S. A. Yamanaka, F. Nishida, L. M. Ellerby, C. R. Nishida, B. Dunn, J. S. Valentine and J. I. Zink, Chem. Mater., 1992, 4, 495.
12. K. Flora and J. D. Brennan, Anal. Chem., 1998, 70, 4505.
13. K. Flora, M. A. Dabrowski, S. P. Musson and J. D. Brennan, Can. J. Chem., 1999, in the press.
14. (a) A. Navas Diaz and M. C. Ramos Peinado, Sens. Actuators B, 1997, 38-39, 426; (b) B. D. MacCraith, C. McDonagh, A. K. McEvoy, T. Butler, G. O'Keeffe and V. Murphy, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 1997, 8, 1053.
15. (a) J. W. Aylott, D. J. Richardson and D. A. Russell, Chem. Mater., 1997, 9, 2261; (b) U. Narang, P. N. Prasad and F. V. Bright, Chem. Mater., 1994, 6, 1596.
16. B. C. Dave, H. Soyez, J. M. Miller, B. Dunn, J. S. Valentine and J. I. Zink, Chem. Mater., 1995, 7, 1431.
17. B. C. Dave, J. M. Miller, B. Dunn, J. S. Valentine and J. I. Zink, J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol., 1997, 8, 629.
18. J. D. Jordan, R. A. Dunbar and F. V. Bright, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1996, 332, 83.
19. B. D. MacCraith, Sens. Actuators B, 1993, 11, 29.
20. K. Flora, J. D. Brennan, G. A. Baker, M. A. Doody and F. V. Bright, Biophys. J., 1998, 75, 1084.
21. R. S. Brown, J. D. Brennan and U. J. Krull, Microchem. J., 1994, 50, 337.
22. S. Lin and W. S. Struve, Photochem. Photobiol., 1991, 54, 361.
23. G. A. Pico, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 1997, 20, 63.
24. (a) M. R. Eftink and C. A. Ghiron, Biochemistry, 1976, 15, 672; (b) M. R. Eftink and C. A. Ghiron, Biochemistry, 1977, 16, 5546; (c) M. R. Eftink and C. A. Ghiron, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1987, 916, 343.
25. J. D. Brennan, J. S. Hartman, E. I. Ilnicki and M. Rakic, Chem. Mater., 1999, in the press.
26. M. Guglielmi, P. Colombo, F. Peron and L. Mancinelli Degli Esposti, J. Mater. Sci., 1992, 27, 5052.
27. R. Peters and K. Beck, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1983, 80, 7183.
28. R. P. Haugland, Molecular Probes Catalog, Molecular, Probes Inc., Eugene, OR, 1992, ch. 2.
29. R. Narazaki, T. Maruyama and M. Otagiri, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1997, 1338, 275.
30. C. J. Brinker and G. W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science, Academic Press, New York, USA1989.
31. M. Gerstein, A. M. Lesk and C. Chothia, Biochemistry, 1994, 33, 6739.
32. (a) J. D. Brennan, J. Fluores., 1999, in the press; (b) H. W. Hellinga and J. S. Marvin, Trends Biotechnol., 1998, 16, 183; (c) K. A. Giuliano, P. L. Post, K. M. Hahn and D. L. Taylor, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 1995, 24, 405.
33. (a) S. Xu, L. Ballard, Y. J. Kim and J. Jonas, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 5787; (b) J.-P. Korb, A. Delville, S. Xu, G. Demeulenaere, P. Costa and J. Johas, J. Chem. Phys., 1994, 101, 7074.