Characterisation and determination of phytochelatins in plant extracts by electrospray tandem mass spectrometry

Abstract

A method based on pneumatically assisted electrospray ionisation tandem mass spectrometry (ESI MS-MS) was developed for the identification, sequencing and determination of phytochelatin (PC) peptides in plant tissue and plant cell cytosols. The ionization and fragmentation conditions were optimized using a series of (GluCys)₂Gly (PC₂), (GluCys)₃Gly (PC₃), and (GluCys)₄Gly (PC₄) standards prepared from glutathione by enzymatically (γ-glutamylcysteine dipeptyl transpeptidase) assisted biosynthesis in the presence of Cd²⁺. Phytochelatins were found to ionize readily to produce a characteristic mono-protonated ion. The collision-induced dissociation (CID) of this ion followed by mass spectrometry (MS-MS mode) allowed the determination of the amino acid sequence of each of the PCs. Calibration curves were linear up to a concentration of 2 µg ml^–1 in the MS and MS-MS modes with the detection limits at the low ng ml^–1 level. The method was applied to the determination of phytochelatin peptides biosynthesized by a number of plant cell cultures exposed to the Cd stress. The results agreed with those obtained by an independent procedure based on reversed-phase HPLC with post-column derivatization of the –SH groups with 5,5′-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid and spectrophotometric detection.

References

1. Heavy Metal Stress in Plants—From Molecules to Ecosystem, ed. M. N. V. Prasad and J. Hagemeyer, Springer, Heidelberg, 1999, p. 401.
2. E. Grill, E. L. Winnacker and M. H. Zenk, Methods Enzymol., 1991, 205, 333.
3. W. E. Rauser, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 1990, 59, 61.
4. M. H. Zenk, Gene, 1996, 179, 21.
5. E. Grill, S. Löffler, E. L. Winnacker and M. H. Zenk, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1989, 86, 6838.
6. W. Gekeler, E. Grill, E. L. Winnacker and M. H. Zenk, Naturforsch., 1989, 44C, 361.
7. E. Grill, W. Gekeler, E. L. Winnacker and M. H. Zenk, FEBS Lett., 1986, 205, 47.
8. S. Klapheck, W. Fliegner and I. Zimmer, Plant Physiol., 1994, 104, 1325.
9. P. Meuwly, P. Thibault, A. L. Schwan and W. E. Rauser, Plant J., 1995, 7, 391.
10. J. Barbas, V. Santhanagopalan, M. Blasczynski, W. R. Ellis Jr. and D. R. Winge, J. Inorg. Biochem., 1992, 48, 95.
11. I. Leopold and D. Günther, Fresenius' J. Anal. Chem., 1997, 359, 364.
12. I. Leopold, D. Günther and D. Neumann, Analusis, 1998, 26, M28.
13. E. Grill, J. Thumann, E. L. Winnacker and M. H. Zenk, Plant Cell Rep., 1998, 7, 375.
14. H. Harmens, P. R. Den Hartog, W. M. Ten Bookum and J. A. C. Verkleij, Plant Physiol., 1993, 103, 1305.
15. A. Tukendorf and W. E. Rauser, Plant Sci., 1990, 70, 155.
16. U. N. Rai, R. D. Tripathi, M. Gupta and P. Chandra, J. Environ. Sci. Health, 1995, A30, 2007.
17. S. Klapheck, W. Fliegner and I. Zimmer, Plant Physiol., 1994, 104, 1325.
18. M. Isobe, D. Uyakul, K. Liu and T. Goto, Agric. Biol. Chem., 1990, 54, 1651.
19. S. A. Hofstadler, R. Bakhtiar and R. D. Smith, J. Chem.Educ., 1996, 73, A82.
20. J. R. Yates, III, A. L. McCormack, A. J. Link, D. Schieltz, J. Eng and L. Hays, Analyst, 1996, 121, 65R.
21. H. Chassaigne and R. Oobiński, Analyst, 1998, 113, 131.
22. R. Oobiński, H. Chassaigne and J. Szpunar, Talanta, 1998, 46, 271.