Selectivity enhancement in spectrophotometry: on-line interference suppression using polyurethane foam minicolumn for aluminum determination with Methyl Thymol Blue

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Ricardo Jorgensen Cassella, Ricardo Erthal Santelli, Aline Garcia Branco, Ricardo Jorgensen Cassella, Valfredo Azevedo Lemos, Sérgio Luis Costa Ferreira and Marcelo Souza de Carvalho


Abstract

A method is proposed for the determination of aluminum by flow injection spectrophotometry with Methyl Thymol Blue after separation of the interferent ions employing a polyurethane foam (PUF) minicolumn. The separation process is based on the retention of the interferents on the PUF minicolumn as thiocyanate complexes. In order to improve the performance of the system the effect of some chemical and flow variables were evaluated and under optimized conditions the system was able to determine aluminum at a concentration of 1.0 µg mL–1 in the presence of Fe(III) at 170 µg mL–1, Zn(II) at 100 µg mL–1 and Cu(II) and Co(II) at 50 µg mL–1, using a PUF minicolumn containing 200 mg of sorbent. The analytical procedure developed was successfully applied to several certified materials, including silicate materials and ores. Very good accuracy and precision was obtained. A limit of detection of 30 ng mL–1 was achieved with RSD of 4.5% at 0.25 µg mL–1. A linear dynamic range from 0.25–2.0 µg mL–1 was observed and a sample frequency of 17 samples per hour was calculated.


References

  1. M. Valcárcel and M. D. Luque de Castro, Non-Chromatographic Continuous Separation Techniques, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, 1991 Search PubMed.
  2. T. Braun, J. D. Navratil and A. B. Farag, Polyurethane Foam Sorbents in Separation Science, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1985 Search PubMed.
  3. D. Wildhagen and V. Krivan, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1993, 274, 257 CrossRef CAS.
  4. S. Beltyukova and G. Balamtsarashvili, Talanta, 1995, 42, 1833 CrossRef CAS.
  5. S. Beltyukova, N. A. Nazarenko and S. V. Tsygankova, Analyst, 1995, 120, 1693 RSC.
  6. A. Alexandrova and S. Arpadjan, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1995, 307, 71 CrossRef CAS.
  7. S. Katragadda, H. D. Gesser and A. Chow, Talanta, 1995, 42, 725 CrossRef CAS.
  8. L. Vuchkova and S. Arpadjan, Talanta, 1996, 43, 479 CrossRef CAS.
  9. M. S. El-Shahiwi and R. S. Al-Meherezi, Talanta, 1997, 44, 483 CrossRef.
  10. J. Ruzicka and E. H. Hansen, Flow Injection Analysis, John Wiley, New York, 2nd edn., 1988 Search PubMed.
  11. M. Valcárcel and M. D. Luque de Castro, Flow Injection Analysis—Principles and Applications, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1987 Search PubMed.
  12. Z. Fang, Flow Injection Separation and Preconcentration, John Wiley, Chichester, 1995 Search PubMed.
  13. D. S. de Jesus, R. J. Cassella, S. L. C. Ferreira, A. C. S. Costa, M. S. de Carvalho and R. E. Santelli, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1998, 366, 263 CrossRef CAS.
  14. S. L. C. Ferreira, D. S. de Jesus, R. J. Cassella, A. C. S. Costa, M. S. de Carvalho and R. E. Santelli, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1999, 378, 289 CrossRef CAS.
  15. Y. W. Bai and J. R. Lu, Fenxi Huaxue, 1994, 22, 916.
  16. S. L. C. Ferreira, V. A. Lemos, A. C. S. Costa, D. S. de Jesus and M. S. de Carvalho, J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 1998, 9, 151 Search PubMed.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.