Precise recognition of nucleic acid bases by polymeric receptors in methanol. Predominance of hydrogen bonding over apolar interactions †

Abstract

In methanol, poly(2-vinyl-4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazine) (PVDAT) precisely recognizes nucleic acid bases and their derivatives through hydrogen-bond formation. The binding activity (uracil, thymine ⪢ cytosine, adenine > pyrimidine, purine ≈ 0) exactly coincides with increasing number in the complementary hydrogen-bonding sites of the guest towards the diaminotriazine residue. The guest-selectivity is higher than that achieved previously in water (H. Asanuma et al., Macromolecules, 1998, 31, 371), mainly because the guest-binding occurs mostly via the hydrogen bonding at aprotic sites provided by the polymeric receptor. Stacking and apolar interactions are ineffective in methanol. The copolymers of 2-vinyl-4,6-diamino-1,3,5-triazine with hydrophobic monomers (styrene and 4-vinylbiphenyl) show still higher guest-selectivities, due to the increased aprotic environment around the diaminotriazine residues.

References

1. A preliminary communication: H. Asanuma, T. Ban, T. Hishiya, S. Gotoh and M. Komiyama, Polym. J., 1996, 28, 1024.
2. (a) M. M. Conn, G. Deslongchamps, J. de Mendoza and J. Rebek Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 3548; (b) Y. Kato, M. M. Conn and J. Rebek Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 3279; (c) Y. Kato, M. M. Conn and J. Rebek Jr., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, 92, 1208 and references cited therein.
3. (a) A. D. Hamilton and D. Van Engen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 5035; (b) A. V. Muehldorf, D. Van Engen, J. C. Warner and A. D. Hamilton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 6561; (c) E. Fan, S. A. V. Arman, S. Kincaid and A. D. Hamilton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 369 and references cited therein.
4. (a) J. F. Constant, J. Fahy and J. Lhomme, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 1777; (b) K. Kurihara, K. Ohto, Y. Honda and T. Kunitake, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 5077; (c) J. S. Nowick and J. S. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 1107; (d) D. M. Perreault, X. Chen and E. V. Anslyn, Tetrahedron, 1995, 51, 353; (e) R. P. Bonar-Law and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 259; (f) S. S. Yoon and W. C. Still, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 823; (g) G. R. Newkome, B. D. Woosley, E. He, C. N. Moorefield, R. Güther, G. R. Baker, G. H. Escamilla, J. Merrill and H. Luftmann, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1996, 2737; (h) M. Mammen, E. E. Simanek and G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 12 614; (i) V. Marchi-Artzner, L. Jullien, T. Gulik-Krzywicki and J.-M. Lehn, Chem. Commun., 1997, 117 and references cited therein.
5. (a) On the molecular recognition by natural receptors, see K. A. Watson, E. P. Mitchell, J. N. Johnson, J. C. Son, C. J. F. Bichard, M. G. Orchard, G. W. J. Fleet, N. G. Oikonomakos, D. D. Leonidas, M. Kontou and A. Papageorgioui, Biochemistry, 1994, 33, 5745; (b) H.-J. Böhm and G. Klebe, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 2588.
6. (a) J. V. Beach and K. J. Shea, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 379; (b) J. Matsui, T. Kato, T. Takeuchi, M. Suzuki, K. Yokoyama, E. Tamiya and I. Karube, Anal. Chem., 1993, 65, 2223; (c) M. J. Whitcombe, M. E. Rodriguez, P. Villar and E. N. Vulfson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 7105; (d) G. Wulff, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1812; (e) H. Asanuma, M. Kakazu, M. Shibata, T. Hishiya and M. Komiyama, Chem. Commun., 1997, 1971 and references cited therein.
7. A. R. Fersht, Trends Biochem. Sci., 1987, 12, 301.
8. H. Asanuma, T. Ban, S. Gotoh, T. Hishiya and M. Komiyama, Macromolecules, 1998, 31, 371.
9. Direct evidence of hydrogen bond formation in methanol was obtained by FTIR measurement: the carbonyl stretching band of uracil shifted to lower frequency on the adduct formation with PVDAT. A similar IR shift was also observed on the hydrogen bond formation between PVDAT and uracil in water, as previously reported in reference 8. This argument was further confirmed by the fact that 3-methyluracil, whose hydrogen bonding site is blocked by a methyl group, was hardly adsorbed by PVDAT.
10. These values are slightly larger than the corresponding value for the complex formation between 2,6-dibutyramidopyridine (a model compound of DAT) and 1-butylthymine (90 m^–1) in non-competitive chloroform.^3b. In contrast, VDAT (monomer of PVDAT) hardly bound uracil in homogeneous DMSO–water mixture. See ref. 8.
11. The slight decrease in the activity with increasing molecular size of the substituent is probably associated with the steric hindrance at the binding sites.
12. T. Itahara, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1996, 2695.
13. Homopolymer of styrene or 4-vinylbiphenyl showed no adsorption activity towards all the guests used in this study.
14. The great binding-activity of PVB-VDAT on adenine in water is ascribed to enhanced hydrophobic interactions.
15. PAAm-VDAT was water-soluble when the VDAT/acrylamide ratio in the polymerization mixture was 1/5.
16. For more hydrophobic copolymers (PST-VDAT and PVB-VDAT), it took about 1 h to attain the equilibrium.
17. D. M. Ruthven, Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1984, p. 49.