Glycoluril † as an efficient molecular template for intramolecular Claisen-type condensations

Abstract

The readily prepared 3,4,7,8-tetramethylglycoluril 1 acts as a template to promote efficient intramolecular Claisen-like condensations between two acyl groups which are attached to the N-1 and N-6 positions. Thus, two sequential acylations of 1 give symmetric or unsymmetric diacylglycolurils 9–18 in good yield. Treatment of 9–18 with lithium tert-alkoxides furnishes N -(β-ketoacyl)glycolurils 19–27 under mild conditions and in high yields; rate-limiting deprotonation, predominantly on the least substituted of the two acyl groups, precedes a fast intramolecular Claisen-type condensation. Reduction of the keto group in 19 and 26, followed by elimination of water gives alk-2-enoylglycolurils 6 and 7; conjugate hydride addition (L-Selectride) then gives alkanoylglycoluril 5. Compounds 5–7 undergo further rounds of N-acylation then intramolecular condensation. Linear chains can thus be constructed on 1 by repetitive sequences of acylation–condensation–functional group transformation. N ¹-Alk-2-enoyl-N ⁶-alkanoylglycolurils 14–17 also afford condensation products with high selectivity upon treatment with L-Selectride, effecting a method for net reversal of the regioselectivity observed in the base-promoted rearrangement. The synthesized chains can be readily removed from the template, regenerating 1. The efficiency of the condensation reaction, the sequence of transformations and the ability to grow linear carbon chains in a repetitive manner mimic these aspects of the catalytic cycle of fatty acid synthases and polyketide synthases.

References

1. R. B. Herbert, The Biosynthesis of Secondary Metabolites, Chapman and Hall, New York, 2nd edn., 1989; J. Mann, Secondary Metabolism, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2nd edn., 1987.
2. For recent reviews, see: D. O'Hagan, Nat. Prod. Rep., 1995, 12, 1 and preceding articles in this series.
3. For reviews, see: C. W. Carreras, R. Pieper and C. Khosla, Top. Curr. Chem., 1997, 188, 85; M. Siggaard-Andersen, Protein Sequences Data Anal., 1993, 5, 325.
4. For selected reviews, see: L. Katz and S. Donadio, Ann. Rev. Microbiol., 1993, 47, 875; D. E. Cane, Science, 1994, 263, 339.
5. For original examples, see: S. Yue, J. S. Duncan, Y. Yamamoto and C. R. Hutchinson, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 1253; D. E. Cane and C.-C. Yang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1987, 109, 1255 for a review, see: Z. Li, R. M. Martin, P. B. Reese, Y. Yoshizawa and J. C. Vederas, Environ. Sci. Res., 1992, 44, 27.
6. For general references to biomimics, see: R. Breslow, Chem. Soc. Rev., 1972, 1, 553; H. Dugas, Bioorganic Chemistry, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2nd edn., 1996for a recent review, see: A. J. Kirby, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35, 707 There are many examples of systems which mimic in vivo C–C bond-forming reactions without mimicking the catalysis due to binding in the enzyme, or the sequence of events that occurs: for example in syntheses of oligoketides reported on oxazolidones, the ‘starter’ unit in the biosynthetic scheme is the last unit to be attached, and the chain is grown in the opposite direction to that occurring on the FAS/PKS surfacefor other examples of intermolecular biomimetic Claisen-like condensations, see: T. M. Harris and C. M. Harris, Tetrahedron, 1977, 33, 2159; Y. Kobuke and J. Yoshida, Tetrahedron Lett., 1978, 367; D. W. Brooks, D.-L. Lu and S. Masamune, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1979, 18, 72 for reviews of biomimetic oligoketide cyclizations, see: M. Yamaguchi, Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem., 1992, 11, 113; T. M. Harris and C. M. Harris, Pure Appl. Chem., 1986, 58, 283.
7. S. Sun and P. Harrison, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992, 33, 7715; S. Sun and P. Harrison, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 2235; C. Cow, D. Valentini and P. Harrison, Can. J. Chem., 1997, 75, 884.
8. A. I. Scott, C. J. Wiesner, S. Yoo and S. K. Chung, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 6277.
9. For a review, see: S. Numa and T. Tanabe in New Comprehensive Biochemistry, ed. S. Numa, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984, vol. 7, p. 1.
10. H. Biltz, Chem. Ber., 1907, 40, 4806.
11. C. A. Brown, Synthesis, 1975, 326 for a review of the related Dieckmann condensation, see: J. P. Schaefer and J. J. Bloomfield, Org. React., 1967, 15, 1.
12. D. A. Evans, J. S. Clark, R. Metternich, V. J. Novack and G. S. Sheppard, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 866.
13. D. A. Evans, M. D. Ennis, T. Le, N. Mandel and G. Mandel, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 1154.
14. For a review, see: D. A. Evans, Aldrichimica Acta, 1982, 15, 23.
15. C. M. Tice and B. Ganem, J. Org. Chem., 1983, 48, 2106.
16. D. A. Evans, M. D. Ennis and D. J. Mathre, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1982, 104, 1737; M. P. Bonner and E. R. Thornton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 1299.
17. N. Li, S. Maluendes, R. H. Blessing, M. Dupuis, G. R. Moss and G. DeTitta, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 6494; B. A. Katz, B. Liu and R. Cass, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 7914.
18. cf. D. A. Evans, M. T. Bilodeau, T. C. Somers, J. Clardy, D. Cherry and Y. Kato, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 5750.
19. For the reduction of similar compounds, see: D. A. Evans and M. DiMare, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 2477 and ref. 13.
20. K. Narasaka, Org. Synth., 1987, 65, 12.
21. W. C. Still, M. Kahn and A. Mitra, J. Org. Chem., 1978, 43, 2923.
22. M. R. Winkle, J. M. Lansinger and R. C. Ronald, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1979, 124.
23. J. L. Lee, A. R. Branfman, T. R. Herrin and K. L. Rinehart, Jr., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 4235.