Structure, epitaxial growth and nucleation of CaO/SrO interfaces using energy minimisation, molecular dynamics and computer graphics

Abstract

Atomistic models of CaO/SrO interfaces have been constructedvia the sequential deposition of CaO species to SrO surfaces in conjunction with energy minimisation and dynamics. Using this approach the nucleation and growth mechanisms of CaO on the SrO support can be explored. The calculations suggest that the surface of the SrO substrate exacts a critical influence on the structure of the thin film. In particular, surface steps and roughness lead to incoherent films which are difficult to characterise with implications for the surface preparation of support materials. Conversely, the CaO species deposited may also degrade the SrO support: both charged and charge neutral surface vacancies on the SrO surface are created and surface steps are eroded during the deposition process. The results also suggest that the lattice misfit between the two materials is accommodated via defects and dislocations within the thin film in addition to considerable structural relaxation of the overlying thin film and the support.

References

1. T. X. T. Sayle, C. R. A. Catlow, D. C. Sayle, S. C. Parker and J. H. Harding, Philos. Mag. A, 1993, 68, 565.
2. D. C. Sayle, C. R. A. Catlow, M.-A. Perrin and P. Nortier, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 8940.
3. H. Grimmer, W. Bollmann and D. H. Warrington, Acta Crystallogr., 1974, 30, 197.
4. G. C. Bond, S. Flamerz and R. Shukri, Faraday Discuss., Chem. Soc., 1989, 87, 65.
5. G. Centi, E. Giamello, D. Pinelli and F. Trifiro, J. Catal., 1991, 130, 220.
6. D. Dimos, P. Chaudhari and J. Mannhart, Phys. Rev. B, 1990, 41, 4038.
7. E. Olsson, A. Gupta, M. D. Thouless, A. Segmuller and D. R. Clarke, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1991, 58, 1682.
8. M. Kubo, Y. Oumi, R. Miura, A. Fahmi, A. Stirling, A. Miyamoto, M. Kawasaki, M. Yoshimoto and H. Koinuma, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 107, 4416.
9. M. Kubo, R. Miura, R. Yamauchi, M. Katagiri, R. Vetrivel, E. Broclawik and A. Miyamoto, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 1995, 34, 6873.
10. M. Kubo, Y. Oumi, R. Miura, A. Stirling, A. Miyamoto, M. Kawasaki, M. Yoshimoto and H. Koinuma, Phys. Rev. B, 1997, 56, 13535.
11. A. L. Shluger, A. L. Rohl and D. H. Gay, Phys. Rev. B, 1995, 51, 13 631; A. L. Shluger, A. L. Rohl and D. H. Gay, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 1995, 13, 1190.
12. D. C. Sayle, C. R. A. Catlow and M.-A. Perrin, Phys. Rev. B, 1997, 56, 15952.
13. B. G. Dick and A. W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev., 1958, 112, 90.
14. T. S. Bush, C. R. A. Catlow and P. D. Battle, J. Mater. Chem., 1995, 5, 1269.
15. D. H. Gay and A. L. Rohl, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1995, 91, 925.
16. W. C. Swope, H. C. Anderson, P. H. Berens and K. R. Wilson, J. Chem. Phys., 1982, 76, 637.
17. C. W. Gear, The numerical integration of ordinary differential equations of various orders, Report ANL 7126, Argonne National Laboratory, 1966.
18. C. W. Gear, Numerical initial value problems in ordinary differential equations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971.
19. D. C. Sayle, PhD Thesis, University of Bath, 1992.
20. O. Eibl, H. E. Hoenig, J.-M. Triscone, O. Fischer, L. Antognazza and O. Brunner, Physica C, 1990, 172, 373.
21. Y. Fujiwara, S. Hirata, M. Iyori and T. Kobayashi, Solid State Commun., 1990, 74, 641.
22. J. Narayan, S. Sharan, R. K. Singh and K. Jagannadham, Mater. Sci. Eng. B, 1989, 2, 333.