Semiporous MoS₂ obtained by the decomposition of thiomolybdate precursors

Abstract

The decomposition of three different ammonium thiomolybdates (NH₄)₂MoS₄xH₂O, (NH₄)₂Mo₂S₁₂xH₂O, and (NH₄)₂Mo₃S₁₃xH₂O (x=1–2) have been studied by TG–DSC under argon. While all three thiomolybdates decompose at around 673 K to yield nearly X-ray amorphous MoS₂ , the precursor (NH₄)₂Mo₃S₁₃xH₂O does so in a manner distinct from the other two precursors displaying a sharp exothermic peak in the DSC trace. We suggest that the unusual thermal behaviour of (NH₄)₂Mo₃S₁₃xH₂O might arise from a topochemical relation between the molecular cluster and 2H-MoS₂ as proposed previously. The porosity of the X-ray amorphous MoS₂ obtained from the decomposition under vacuum of (NH₄)₂Mo₃S₁₃xH₂O is unusually large and the material displays interesting sorption behaviour towards small organic molecules. This X-ray amorphous semiporous modification of MoS₂ has been characterized in detail by powder X-ray diffraction, high resolution electron microscopy and from its extended X-ray absorption fine structure. An unusual feature of this material is the presence of bent, open-ended lamellae of MoS₂ , contrasting fullerene-like MoS₂ which forms closed shells.

References

1. I. L. Singer, in Fundamentals of Friction: Macroscopic and Microscopic Processes, ed. I. L. Singer and H. M. Pollock, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1992.
2. D. Delmon, Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg., 1995, 104, 173.
3. Y. Feldman, E. Wasserman, D. J. Srolovitz and R. Tenne, Science, 1995, 267, 222; M. Hershfinkel, L. A. Gheber, V. Volterra, J. L. Hutchison, L. Margulis and R. Tenne, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 1914.
4. L. Rapoport, Y. Bilik, Y. Feldman, M. Homyonfer, S. R. Cohen and R. Tenne, Nature (London), 1997, 387, 791.
5. J. P. Wilcoxon and G. A. Samara, Phys. Rev. B., 1995, 51, 7299.
6. W. M. R. Divigalpitiya, R. F. Frindt and S. R. Morrison, Science, 1990, 246, 369; E. Ruiz-Hitzky, R. Jiminez, B. Casal, V. Manriques, A. Santa Ana and G. Gonzalez, Adv. Mater., 1993, 738; E. Ruiz-Hitzky, Adv. Mater., 1993, 334; H. Tagaya, T. Hashimoto, M. Karasu, T. Izumi and K. Chiba, Chem. Lett., 1992, 213.
7. A. Müller, E. Diemann, A. Branding, F. W. Baumann, M. Breysse and M. Vrinat, Appl. Catal., 1990, 62, L13.
8. T. P. Prasad, E. Diemann and A. Müller, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1973, 35, 1895.
9. A. Müller and E. Diemann, Chimia, 1985, 39, 312.
10. E. Diemann, A. Müller and P. R. Aymonino, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1981, 479, 191.
11. G. Krüss, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1884, 225, 6.
12. A. Müller, R. G. Bhattacharya and B. Pfefferkorn, Chem. Ber., 1979, 112, 778.
13. A. Müller, S. Sarkar, R. G. Bhattacharya, S. Pohl and M. Dartmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1978, 17, 535.
14. M. M. J. Treacy, M. W. Deem and J. M. Newsam, Computer code DIFFAX v.1.801, 1990; Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1991, 433, 499; Ultramicroscopy, 1993, 52, 512.
15. J. Rodriguez-Carvajal, in Proc. Satellite Meeting on Powder Diffraction of the XV Congress of the IUCr., Toulouse, France, 1990.
16. A. Oberlin, in Chemistry and Physics of Carbon, ed. P. A. Thrower, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1988, pp. 1–143.
17. D. Ugarte, Nature (London), 1992, 359, 707.
18. J. C. Wildervanck and F. Jellinek, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1964, 328, 309.
19. A. Michalowicz, Logiciels pour la Chimie, Société Française de Chimie, Paris, 1991, p. 102.
20. R. Bissessur, J. Heising, W. Hirpo and M. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater., 1996, 8, 318.