Electrochemical and chemical processes for hydride generation in flow injection ICP-MS: determination of arsenic in natural waters

Abstract

A flow injection system involving hydride generation is proposed for the determination of arsenic in natural waters by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The manifold was designed to permit a direct comparison between chemical (NaBH₄) and electrochemical (EcHG) processes for hydride generation, using sodium tetrahydroborate or a Nafion membrane, respectively. Reactions were carried out in different manifold sites, and separation/transportation of the evolved gaseous species and quantification occurred in the same devices under similar conditions. Interferences by Co(II), Ni (II), Cu(II), Zn(II) and Pb(II) were evaluated for both systems. When NaBH₄ was used, addition of these species decreased the As signal, whereas for electrochemical arsine formation, the interference effects were dependent on the Pt cathode conditions. Interferences due to the above metals were modified when the cathode underwent Pb deposition. About 60 samples were run per hour and the measurement precision for 10 µg l^–1 As was characterized by an RSD <3%. A higher sensitivity was verified for NaBH₄ (LOD=0.05 µg l^–1 As) than EcHG (0.2 µg l^–1 As). Accuracy was assessed by using standard reference materials and spiked river water samples.

References

1. W. Holak, Anal. Chem., 1969, 41, 1712.
2. L. Tomlinson, J. Electrochem. Soc., 1964, 111, 593.
3. R. S. Braman, L. L. Justen and C. C. Foreback, Anal. Chem., 1972, 44, 2195.
4. C. Schickling, J. Yang and J. A. C. Broekaert, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1996, 11, 739.
5. W.-W. Ding and R. E. Sturgeon, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1996, 11, 225.
6. I. S. Krull, J. Chromatogr. Libr., 1991, 47, 37.
7. Y. Lin, X. Wang, D. Yuan, P. Yang, B. Huang and Z. Zhuang, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1992, 7, 287.
8. V. I. Rigin and G. N. Verkhoturov, Zh. Anal. Khim., 1977, 32, 1965.
9. V. I. Rigin, Zh. Anal. Khim., 1978, 33, 1966.
10. V. I. Rigin, Zh. Anal. Khim., 1979, 34, 1569.
11. A. Brockmann, C. Nonn and A. Golloch, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1993, 8, 397.
12. D. M. Huebner and J. D. Winefordner, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1995, 316, 129.
13. W.-W. Ding and R. E. Sturgeon, Spectrochim. Acta, Part B, 1996, 51, 1325.
14. W.-W. Ding and R. E. Sturgeon, J. Anal. At. Spectrom., 1996, 11, 421.
15. F. J. Krug, H. Bergamin F^o and E. A. G. Zagatto, Anal. Chim. Acta, 1986, 179, 103.
16. Z. Fang, Flow Injection Separation and Preconcentration, VCH, Weinheim, Germany, 1993, p. 132.
17. J. Ruzicka and E. H. Hansen, Flow Injection Analysis, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 2nd edn., 1988, p. 499.
18. B. Welz and M. Melcher, Analyst, 1984, 109, 569.
19. A. O. Jacintho, L. F. R. Machado, A. A. Menegário, I. A. Rufini and M. F. Giné, Talanta, submitted for publication.