Chemistry reduction and thermokinetic criteria for ignition of hydrogen–air mixtures at high pressures

Abstract

A systematic methodology consisting of sensitivity analysis, principal component analysis, quasi-steady-state analysis, and reaction path analysis is applied at bifurcation points to deduce the kinetic and thermal interactions at ignition of H₂–air mixtures at high pressures in a flow reactor. Singularity theory is subsequently used to derive thermokinetic ignition criteria, capable of accurately predicting ignition temperature over a wide range of pressure along the second and third ignition limits. Comparison of thermokinetic criteria to the second ignition branch isothermal kinetic criterion shows the importance of HO₂ and H₂O₂ chemistry and reaction exothermicity at high pressures. Thermally, ignition along the third branch is shown to be primarily driven by the exothermicity of the H+O₂+M→HO₂+M reaction. Transport analysis indicates that the outflow of H₂O₂ becomes quite important at high pressures, causing the shift in the third ignition branch with respect to residence time. A revised isothermal kinetic criterion for the higher pressures of the second ignition limit is also proposed.

References

1. W. Kordylewski and S. K. Scott, Combust. Flame, 1984, 57, 127.
2. B. Lewis and G. von Elbe, Combustion, Flames and Explosions of Gases, Academic Press, Orlando, 1987.
3. G. Dixon-Lewis and D. J. Williams, in Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics, eds. C. H. Bamford and C. F. H. Tipper, Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol. 17, 1977, p. 1.
4. P. Gray, J. F. Griffiths and S. K. Scott, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1984, 394, 243.
5. P. Gray and S. K. Scott, Chemical Oscillations and Instabilities, Nonlinear Chemical Kinetics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1990.
6. D. G. Vlachos, L. D. Schmidt and R. Aris, Combust. Flame, 1993, 95, 313.
7. D. G. Vlachos, Combust. Flame, 1995, 103, 59.
8. S. Kalamatianos and D. G. Vlachos, Combust. Sci. Technol., 1995, 109, 347.
9. D. G. Vlachos, Chem Eng. Sci., 1996, 51, 3979.
10. S. Kalamatianos, Y. K. Park and D. G. Vlachos, Combust. Flame, 1998, 112, 45.
11. D. G. Vlachos, P.-A. Bui, Y. K. Park and P. Aghalayam, International Colloquium on Advanced Computation and Analysis of Combustion, ENAS, Moscow, 1997, p. 100.
12. T. G. Kreutz, M. Nishioka and C. K. Law, Combust. Flame, 1994, 99, 758.
13. S. R. Lee and C. K. Law, Combust. Sci. Technol., 1994, 97, 377.
14. T. G. Kreutz and C. K. Law, Combust. Flame, 1996, 104, 157.
15. A. H. Willbourn and C. N. Hinschelwood, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1946, 185, 376.
16. V. A. Poltorak and V. V. Voevodsky, Zh. Fiz. Khim., 1950, 24, 299.
17. B. F. Gray and C. H. Yang, J. Phys. Chem., 1965, 69, 2747.
18. B. F. Gray and C. H. Yang, Eleventh Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1967, pp. 1057.
19. J. A. Barnard and A. G. Platts, Combust. Sci. Technol., 1972, 6, 133.
20. K. K. Foo and C. H. Yang, Combust. Flame, 1971, 17, 223.
21. R. J. Kee, F. M. Rupley and J. A. Miller, The CHEMKIN Thermodynamic Data Base, Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND87-8215B, 1991.
22. J. A. Miller and C. T. Bowman, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 1989, 15, 287.
23. K. Chinnick, C. Gibson, J. F. Griffiths and W. Kordylewski, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1986, 405, 117.
24. E. P. Dougherty and H. Rabitz, J. Chem. Phys., 1980, 72, 6571.
25. A. S. Tomlin, M. J. Pilling, T. Turanyi, J. H. Merkin and J. Brindley, Combust. Flame, 1992, 91, 107.
26. R. A. Yetter, H. Rabitz and R. M. Hedges, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 1991, 23, 251.
27. S. Vajda, P. Valko and T. Turanyi, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 1985, 17, 55.
28. Y. K. Park and D. G. Vlachos, Combust. Flame, 1998, in press.
29. B. R. Johnson, S. K. Scott and A. S. Tomlin, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1991, 87, 2539.