Stabilities in water and Gibbs free energies of transfer from water to nonaqueous solvents of alkali metal ion complexes with 1,2-bis[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]benzene (acyclic polyether)

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Shoichi Katsuta, Chihiro Takagi, Munehiro Tanaka, Naoaki Fukada and Yasuyuki Takeda


Abstract

Stability constants of 1:1 complexes, ML+ (M+ and L being a univalent metal ion and a ligand, respectively), of Na+ and K+ with 1,2-bis[2-(2-methoxyethoxy)ethoxy]benzene (AC · B18C6), a linear counterpart of benzo-18-crown-6 (B18C6), were determined in water at 25°C by conductometry. The stability of ML+ is lower for AC · B18C6 than for B18C6 because of the macrocyclic effect, and AC · B18C6 is selective for Na+ in contrast to B18C6. Also determined were Gibbs free energies of transfer (ΔGH2O→S°) from water to nonaqueous solvent S (S=acetonitrile, propylene carbonate and methanol) of AC · B18C6 and B18C6 at 25°C through measurements of the distribution constants between tetradecane and the polar solvent. From these data as well as the literature values of KML in the nonaqueous solvents and of ΔGH2O→S° of M+, the ΔGH2O→S° values of ML+ complexes of the alkali-metal ions with AC · B18C6 and B18C6 were calculated. The ΔGH2O→S° values of M+ are positive but those of ML+ and L are negative in all the systems. This indicates that, although the M+ ions are more soluble in water than in the nonaqueous solvents, when the M+ forms a complex with the lipophilic L, the complex becomes more soluble in the nonaqueous solvent than in water. The lipophilicity of AC · B18C6 is higher than that of B18C6, but the reverse holds for the ML+ complexes. It was concluded that AC · B18C6 shields the M+ ions less effectively in the complexes from the surrounding solvents than B18C6.


References

  1. B. G. Cox and H. Schneider, in Coordination and Transport Properties of Macrocyclic Compounds in Solution, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, p. 81 Search PubMed.
  2. Y. Takeda, R. Kohno, Y. Kudo and N. Fukada, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1989, 62, 999 CAS.
  3. Y. Takeda, S. Sakamoto, N. Ohashi and N. Fukada, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1988, 61, 2707 CAS.
  4. Y. Takeda, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1983, 56, 866 CAS.
  5. Y. Takeda, H. Yano, M. Ishibashi and H. Isozumi, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1980, 53, 72 CAS.
  6. Y. Takeda and H. Yano, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1980, 53, 1720 CAS.
  7. Y. Takeda, in Cation Binding by Macrocycles, ed. Y. Inoue and G. W. Gokel, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1991, p. 133 Search PubMed.
  8. G. Chaput, G. Jeminet and J. Juillard, Can. J. Chem., 1975, 53, 2240 CAS.
  9. Y. Takeda, Y. Ohyagi and S. Akabori, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 1984, 57, 3381 CAS.
  10. Y. Takeda and T. Kimura, J. Inclusion Phenom., 1991, 11, 159 CAS.
  11. A. F. M. Barton, Chem. Rev., 1975, 75, 731 CrossRef CAS.
  12. Y. Takeda, T. Kimura, S. Ochiai, S. Yajima, Y. Kudo, M. Ouchi and T. Hakushi, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans., 1995, 91, 4079 RSC.
  13. I. M. Kolthoff and M. K. Chantooni Jr., Anal. Chem., 1980, 52, 1039 CrossRef CAS.
  14. Y. Marcus, Pure Appl. Chem., 1983, 55, 977 CAS.
  15. M. K. Chantooni Jr. and I. M. Kolthoff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1981, 78, 7245.
  16. D. R. Rosseinsky, Chem. Rev., 1965, 65, 467 CrossRef CAS.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.