Capillary electrophoresis with chemical reaction Effect of ionic strength

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

D. Šnita, H. Ševčíková, J. Lindner, M. Marek and J. H. Merkin


Abstract

A brief summary of the results of experimental observations of the effects of electric fields on propagating reaction fronts and pulses is presented. A prototype ionic chemical system consisting of a substrate A+ and an autocatalyst B+ and two further non-reacting species C- and D+ is then considered when an electric field with a constant current is applied. An autocatalytic reaction between A+ and B+ with a quadratic rate law is assumed. Results obtained from extensive numerical simulations of the model are reported. These show that the system is capable of supporting a variety of propagating fronts; ‘kinetic waves’, ‘Kohlrausch boundaries’ and complete species separation are all observed as well as a new type of wave front in which there is a much enhanced reaction rate. The behaviour is characterized in terms of the applied electric current, the ionic strength, and the ratio of the diffusion coefficients of the reacting species.


References

  1. H. Ševčíková and M. Marek, Physica D, 1983, 9, 140 CrossRef.
  2. H. Ševčíková and M. Marek, Physica D, 1984, 13, 379 CrossRef.
  3. H. Ševčíková, M. Marek and S. C. Müller, Science, 1992, 257, 951 CAS.
  4. R. Feeney, S. L. Schmidt and P. Ortoleva, Physica D, 1981, 2, 536 CrossRef.
  5. O. Steinbock, J. Schütze and S. C. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1992, 68, 248 CrossRef CAS.
  6. K. I. Agladze and P. De Kepper, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, 5239 CrossRef.
  7. A. P. Muñuzuri, M. Gómez-Gesteira, V. Pérez-Muñuzuri, V. I. Krinsky and V. Pérez-Villar, Phys. Rev. E, 1994, 50, 4258 CrossRef CAS.
  8. V. eŕrez-Muñuzuri, R. Aliev, B. Vaisev and V. I. Krinsky, Physica D, 1992, 56, 229 CrossRef.
  9. S. C. Müller, O. Steinbock and J. Schütze, Physica A, 1995, 188, 47 CrossRef.
  10. P. Kaštánek, J. Kosek, D. Šnita, I. Schreiber and M. Marek, Physica D, 1995, 84, 79 CrossRef CAS.
  11. H. Ševčíková, J. Kosek and M. Marek, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 1666 CrossRef CAS.
  12. H. Ševčíková, I. Schreiber and M. Marek, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 19153 CrossRef CAS.
  13. D. Šnita and M. Marek, Physica D, 1994, 75, 521 CrossRef CAS.
  14. P. Ortoleva, Physica D, 1987, 26, 67 CrossRef.
  15. D. Šnita, H. Ševčíková, M. Marek and J. H. Merkin, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 18740 CrossRef CAS.
  16. D. Šnita, H. Ševčíková, M. Marek and J. H. Merkin, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A, 1997, 453, 2325 CAS.
  17. F. Kohlrausch, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), 1897, 62, 209 Search PubMed.
  18. R. A. Mosher, D. A. Saville and W. Thormann, The dynamics of electrophoresis, VCH, Weinheim, 1992 Search PubMed.
  19. D. Šnita, J. Lindner, M. Marek and J. H. Merkin, Math. Comput. Modell. in press Search PubMed.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.