Density functional study of hydrogen exchange and methane elimination from bis(cyclopentadienyl)tungsten methyl hydrides and their ansa-bridged analogues

Abstract

Theoretical calculations have been carried out using density functional theory on the hydrogen exchange and methane elimination reactions of [W(η-C₅H₅)₂(Me)H] and [W{(η-C₅H₄)₂CH₂}(Me)H]. In both cases the hydrogen exchange proceeds along a similar reaction path on which lies a η¹-H σ complex. The midpoint of the exchange reaction is a η²-H,H σ complex. For [W(η-C₅H₅)₂(Me)H] a transition state is proposed which is calculated to lie 81 kJ mol^–1 above the ground state. This compares with an experimental free energy of activation of 106 kJ mol^–1 for [W(η-C₅H₅)₂(Me)D]. Elimination of methane is calculated to have an overall reaction energy of 19.6 kJ mol^–1 for [W(η-C₅H₅)₂(Me)H] and 78.3 kJ mol^–1 for [W{(η-C₅H₄)₂CH₂}(Me)H]. The activation energy for elimination from the two compounds is estimated as around 80 and 85 kJ mol^–1 respectively. The principal reason for the relative stability of the [W(η-C₅H₅)₂] product is its relaxation to a parallel ring triplet state which is calculated to lie 67.9 kJ mol^–1 below the lowest excited singlet state. For [W{(η-C₅H₄)₂CH₂}] the singlet and triplet states are separated by 13.3 kJ mol^–1 with the rings inclined at an angle constrained by the ansa bridge.

References

1. P. Grebnik, A. J. Downs, M. L. H. Green and R. N. Perutz, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1979, 742.
2. J. Chetwynd-Talbot, P. Grebnik and R. N. Perutz, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 3647.
3. C. Gianotti and M. L. H. Green, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1972, 1114.
4. N. J. Cooper, M. L. H. Green and R. Mahtab, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1979, 1557.
5. M. Berry, K. Elmitt and M. L. H. Green, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1979, 1950.
6. M. Berry, N. J. Cooper, M. L. H. Green and S. J. Simpson, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1980, 29.
7. R. M. Bullock, C. E. L. Headford, S. E. Kegley and J. R. Norton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107, 727.
8. R. M. Bullock, C. E. L. Headford, K. M. Hennessy, S. E. Kegley and J. R. Norton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 3897.
9. G. Parkin and J. E. Bercaw, Organometallics, 1989, 8, 1172.
10. L. Labella, A. Chernega and M. L. H. Green, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1995, 395.
11. A. Chernega, J. Cook, M. L. H. Green, L. Labella, S. J. Simpson, J. Souter and A. H. H. Stephens, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1977, 3225.
12. H. Munakata, American Chemical Society, New Orleans, 1996.
13. H. H. Brintzinger, L. L. Lohr and K. L. Tang Wong, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 5146.
14. R. A. Periana and R. G. Bergmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 7332, 7346.
15. J. M. Buchanan, J. M. Stryker and R. G. Bergmann, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1986, 108, 1537.
16. R. H. Crabtree, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1993, 32, 789.
17. C. Hall and R. N. Perutz, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 3125.
18. ADF (version 2.0.1), G. te Velde and E. J. Baerends, Department of Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, 1996.
19. S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys., 1980, 58, 1200.
20. A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A, 1988, 38, 2398.
21. J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B, 1986, 33, 8822.
22. J. P. Perdew, Phys. Rev. B, 1986, 34, 7046.
23. J. Souter, D.Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford, 1996.