Co-ordination chemistry and molecular mechanics study of the magnesium(II) and calcium(II) complexes of trisubstituted 1,4,7-triazacyclononane derivatives

Abstract

The affinities of 1,4,7-tris(2-hydroxyalkyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane derivatives for Mg^II and Ca^II were found to differ greatly. Whereas 1,4,7-tris(2-hydroxyethyl)- (L¹), 1,4,7-tris(2-hydroxy-2-methylpropyl)- (L²) and the unsymmetrical 1,4,7-tris(2-hydroxypropyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane derivative L^3b barely discriminated between Mg^II and Ca^II, the symmetrical isomer L^3a was more than 500 times more selective for Mg^II than for Ca^II. Similar selectivity differences were observed between the diastereomers of 1,4,7-tris(2-hydroxy-2-phenylethyl)- (L⁴) and 1,4,7-tris(2-hydroxydodecyl)-1,4,7-triazacyclononane (L⁵). These selectivities were related to the structure of the magnesium complexes as shown by molecular mechanics (MMX) calculations. Only those ligands favoring the formation of a magnesium complex with a large twist angle between the planes of co-ordinating oxygens and ring nitrogens resulting in a small, tight cavity showed a large preference for Mg^II over Ca^II. The MMX calculations predicted large twist angle structures for phosphinate derivatives, and for a phosphonate monoester derivative, and these ligands were found to have a high selectivity for Mg^II. Similarly, the calculated preference for the smaller twist angle correctly predicted the lack of Mg^II/Ca^II selectivity for acetate and amide derivatives and for a phosphonate diester derivative. Equilibration of the complexes of the ligands in the presence of both Mg^II and Ca^II was slow, as shown for example by k_d,0 = 2.1 × 10^–4 s^–1 for CaL^3a. These dissociation rates were a factor of 100 times larger at the boundary of a two-phase (water–chloroform) system.

References

1. A. E. Martell, R. M. Smith and R. J. Motekaitis, NIST Critical Stability Constants of Metal Complexes Database, NIST Standard Reference Database 46, NIST Standard Reference Data, Gaithersburg, MD, 1993.
2. M. J. van der Merwe, J. C. A. Boeyens and R. D. Hancock, Inorg. Chem., 1985, 24, 1208.
3. R. Ramasamy, I. Lazar, E. Brücher, A. D. Sherry and C. R. Malloy, FEBS Lett., 1991, 280, 121.
4. J. van Haveren, L. DeLeon, R. Ramasamy, J. van Westrenen and A. D. Sherry, NMR Biomed., 1995, 8, 197.
5. J. Huskens and A. D. Sherry, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 4396.
6. A. Bevilacqua, R. I. Gelb, W. B. Hebard and L. J. Zompa, Inorg. Chem., 1987, 26, 2699.
7. J. Huskens and A. D. Sherry, Chem. Commun., 1997, 845.
8. B. A. Sayer, J. P. Michael and R. D. Hancock, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1983, 77, L63.
9. J. Robb and R. D. Peacock, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1986, 121, L15.
10. J. H. Forsberg, R. M. Delaney, Q. Zhao, G. Harakas and R. Chandran, Inorg. Chem., 1995, 34, 3705.
11. H. Tsukube, H. Adachi and S. Morosawa, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1989, 1537; J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 7102.
12. E. Cole, R. C. B. Copley, J. A. K. Howard, D. Parker, G. Ferguson, J. F. Gallagher, B. Kaitner, A. Harrison and L. Royle, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1994, 1619.
13. I. Fallis, L. J. Farrugia, N. M. Macdonald and R. D. Peacock, Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 779.
14. A. A. Belal, L. J. Farrugia, R. D. Peacock and J. Robb, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1989, 931.
15. L. J. Farrugia, N. M. Macdonald, R. D. Peacock and J. Robb, Polyhedron, 1995, 4, 541.
16. K. Wieghardt, U. Bossek, P. Chaudhuri, W. Herrmann, B. C. Menke and J. Weiss, Inorg. Chem., 1982, 21, 4308.
17. M. J. van der Merwe, J. C. A. Boeyens and R. D. Hancock, Inorg. Chem., 1983, 22, 3490.
18. J. Huskens and A. D. Sherry, Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 5137.