Reappraisal of the spin-forbidden unimolecular decay of the methoxy cation†
(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )
Massimiliano Aschi, Jeremy N. Harvey, Christoph A. Schalley, Detlef Schröder and Helmut Schwarz
Abstract
The mechanism of the unimolecular loss of H2 from triplet methoxy cations (3CH3O+) is revised.
References
D. R. Yarkony, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 18 612 CrossRefCAS.
Selected references:
(a) M. S. B. Munson and J. L. Franklin, J. Phys. Chem., 1964, 68, 3191 CAS;
(b) R. D. Bowen and D. H. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1977, 378 RSC;
(c) P. v. R. Schleyer, A. D. Jemmis and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1978, 190 RSC;
(d) M. M. Bursey, J. R. Hass, D. J. Harvan and C. E. Parker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1979, 101, 5485 CrossRefCAS;
(e) P. C. Burgers and J. L. Holmes, Org. Mass Spectrom., 1984, 19, 452 CAS;
(f) D. R. Yarkony, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 5406 CrossRefCAS;
(g) S.-C. Kuo, Z. Zhang, R. B. Klemm, J. F. Liebman, L. J. Stief and F. L. Nesbitt, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 4026 CrossRefCAS.
(a) E. Uggerud and T. Helgaker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1992, 114, 4265 CrossRefCAS;
(b) C. A. Schalley, M. Dieterle, D. Schröder, H. Schwarz and E. Uggerud, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion. Processes, 1997, 163, 101 CrossRefCAS.
The experiments were carried out with a four-sector ZAB-2F-HF/AMD604 mass spectrometer (ref. 5). Methoxy cations were generated by charge reversal (CR) of the corresponding anions [ref. 2(d)]. Hydroxymethyl cations were formed by electron ionization of labelled ethanols. The ions’ connectivities were checked by collisional activation (CA) and CR/CA experiments [refs. 2(e), 3(b)]. The metastable ion decomposition products were monitored in MI and CR/MI experiments by scanning the fourth sector.
C. A. Schalley, D. Schröder and H. Schwarz, Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes, 1996, 153, 173 CrossRef.
B. A. Rumpf, C. E. Allison and P. J. Derrick, Org. Mass Spectrom., 1986, 21, 295 CAS.
The MI mass spectra of [C,H3,O]+ and [C,D3,O]+ were also recorded, and the results are consistent with the present analysis.
KIE1 and KIE2 are product determining. Intermolecular kinetic isotope effects have not been taken into account, but, of course, would not affect the qualitative conclusions made here.
The effect of different internal energies of non-ergodicity on KIE2 is probably small; an enormous change would anyway be needed to modify the conclusions outlined in Scheme 2.
For evaluation of the kinetic isotope effects, several experiments were averaged and the intensities were corrected for mass discrimination (see ref. 6) and for the statistical weights of H2, HD and D2.
G. Hvistendahl and D. H. Williams, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1975, 4 RSC.
J. N. Harvey, M. Aschi, H. Schwarz and W. Koch, Theor. Chem. Acc., in the press, and references cited therein Search PubMed.
N. L. Ma, B. J. Smith, J. A. Pople and L. Radom, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 7903 CrossRefCAS.
Calculations at the UMP2 and B3LYP levels of theory were performed with GAUSSIAN94 [ref. 15(a)] and the 6-311+G(d,p)(BSI) basis set. The MECPs were located using our recently described method (ref. 12), and the gradients at these points were inspected to verify that they connect to the relevant minima. The CCSD(T) calculations at B3LYP optimized geometries were performed in MOLPRO [ref. 15(b)] with the cc-pVTZ basis set, omitting the d functions on hydrogen (BSII). At this level, the MECPs were optimized using the hybrid method of ref. 12 with B3LYP/BSI gradients.
(a) GAUSSIAN 94, Revision E.1, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995;
(b) MOLPRO 96.4 is a package of ab initio programs written by H.-J. Werner and P. J. Knowles;
(c) GAMESS USA (18th March 1997 version), M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. H. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. J. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis and J. A. Montgomery, J. Comput. Chem., 1993, 14, 1347 Search PubMed; PC version compiled by A. A. Granovsky, Moscow State University CrossRefCAS.
These calculations were performed using an approximate one-electron Hamiltonian (ref. 17), as implemented in GAMESS [ref. 15(c)]. The GAMESS TZV basis set was used with one heavy atom d-polarisation function; the singlet and triplet states were described by CI wavefunctions expanded within a basis of HF orbitals generated either for the singlet or the triplet; the effective nuclear charges used were those recommended in ref. 17.
The CI expansion included all possible determinants formed by allocating the eight valence electrons into five orbitals, and by allowing single excitations into the virtual orbitals. The value reported is the magnitude of the HSO complex matrix element between coupled substates.
S. Koseki, M. S. Gordon, M. W. Schmidt and N. Matsunaga, J. Phys. Chem., 1995, 99, 12 764 CrossRefCAS.
The relative slope of the two surfaces at the MECP also affects the surface hopping probability. This factor is very similar at the two MECPs.
Spin crossover is also important in transition and chemistry. See, for example S. Shaik, M. Filatov, D. Schröder and H. Schwarz, Chem. Eur. J., 1998, 4, 193 Search PubMed.
Proton transfer reactions involving spin changes were recently reported: J. Hu, B. T. Hill and R. Squires, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 11 699 Search PubMed; P. A. Janaway, M. Zhing, P. P. Gater, M. L. Chabinye and J. I. Brennan, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 11 697 CrossRefCAS.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.