An indicator of its time: two millennia of the iron–gall-nut test†

Abstract

The reaction between iron salts and the extract or tincture of gall-nuts is a unique example of an analytical reagent, for its use has been known and recorded for around 2000 years. In its time it became an important but controversial method for detecting iron in solution, before being supplanted by more effective reagents. The purpose of this paper is to review the history of the reagent and to show that not only is it an indicator of iron, but also an indicator of the chemical understanding of the times: ‘a litmus test’ of chemical knowledge.

References

1. G. Plinius Secundus, Naturallis Historiae, Book 34, p. 112, in H. Rackham, trans., Pliny Natural History, Books XXXIII–XXXV, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
2. G. Plinius Secundus, ref. 1, p. 211.
3. J. F. Healy, Pliny the Elder, Natural History a Selection, Penguin, London, 1991, p. 318.
4. P. Holland, The Historie of the World, Commonly Called The Natural History of C. Plinius Secundus, London, 1661, vol. 2, p. 508.
5. K. C. Bailey, The Elder Pliny's Chapters on Chemical Subjects, Edward Arnold, London, 1929, Part 2, p. 41.
6. K. C. Bailey, ref. 5, p. 172.
7. G. Plinius Secundus, ref. 1, Book XXXV, p. 184.
8. M. Nierenstein, ‘The early history of the first chemical reagents’, Isis, 1931, 16, 439.
9. R. P. Jammy, Beati Alberti Magni, Ratisbonensis Episcopi, Ordinis Praedicatorum Opera, Lugdini, 1651, vol. 4, p. 367.
10. C. H. Haskins, Studies in the History of Mediaeval Science, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1924, p. 3, quoting, E. Renan, Averroès, Paris, 1869, p. 200.
11. J. F. Healy, ref. 3, pp. xxxvii–xxviii.
12. J. R. Partington, ‘Albertus Magnus on alchemy’, Ambix, 1937, 1, 3.
13. J. R. Partington, A Short History of Chemistry, Macmillan, London, 3rd edn., 1957, p. 34.
14. Paracelsus, ‘Eilff Tractat oder Bücher von Ursprung und Ursacherref’, in Opera Bücher und Schriften, ed. J. Huser, Strassburg, 1616, vol. 1, p. 521(See also ref. 10 in ref. 8).
15. G. Rath, ‘Die Anfänge der Mienralquellenanalyse’, Med. Monatschr., 1949, 3, 539.
16. T. P. Sherlock, ‘The chemical works of Paracelsus’, Ambix, 1948, 3, 33.
17. A. Libavius, ‘De judicio aquarum mineralium et horum quae cum illis inveniuntur’, in Alchemia, Frankfurt, 1597, pp. 272–392.
18. L. Thurneisser, Pison, von Kalten, Warmen, Minerischen und Metallischen Wassern, Frankfurt and Strassburg, 1572 and 1612, pp. 17–23.
19. A. G. Debus, ‘Solution analysis prior to Robert Boyle’, Chymia, 1962, 8, 41.
20. G. Agricola, De Re Metallica, transl. H. C. Hoover and H. L. Hoover, Dover, New York, 1950, p. 34.
21. G. Agricola, ref. 20, p. 235.
22. V. Biringuccio, The Pirotechnia, transl. C. S. Smith and M. T. Gnudi, Basic Books, New York, 1959, (reissue of 1942 original), p. 15.
23. G. Fallopius, De Medicatis Aquis atque de Fossilibus, Venice, 1569, folios 30–37.
24. O. Tachenius, Hippocrates Chymicus, English Translation, London, 1690.
25. R. Boyle, Experiments and Considerations Touching Colours, 1664, Johnson Reprint Corporation, New York, 1964, p. 135.
26. R. Boyle, ‘Short memoirs for the natural experimental history of mineral waters’, 1685, in Collected Works, ed. A. Millar, London, 1744, vol. 4, pp. 237–239.
27. J. R. Partington, ref. 13, p. 67.
28. O. Tachenius, ref. 24, pp. 56–57.
29. O. Tachenius, ref. 24, p. 60.
30. O. Tachenius, ref. 24, p. 58.
31. W. Lewis, Commercium Philosophico-Technicum, or the Philosophical Commerce of the Arts, Designed as an Attempt to Improve the Arts, Trade and Manufacture, Two Volumes, 1763 and 1766, vol. 2, pp. 344–50.
32. J. R. Partington, ref. 13, p. 217.
33. Guyton de Morveau, Éléments de Chymie, Dijon, 1778, vol. 3, p. 403.
34. C. W. Scheele, The Collected Papers of Carl Wilhelm Scheele, transl. L. Dobbin and G. Bell, London, 1931; reissued Kraus Reprint Co., New York, 1971, p. 306.
35. A. Lavoisier, Elements of Chemistry, transl. W. Kerr, Edinburgh, 1790, p. 277; reprinted in facsimile by Dover, New York, 1965.
36. M. Berthollet, Elements of the Art of Dyeing, 1791 and 1874, vol. I, p. 86.
37. C. Deyeux, ‘Memoire sur la noix de galle’, Ann. Chim., 1793, 17, 3.
38. W. Henry and R. Hare, The Elements of Experimental Chemistry, 2nd American edn. from the 8th London edn., Philadelphia, 1823, vol. 2, p. 90.
39. ref. 38, p. 322.
40. H. Watts, A Dictionary of Chemistry, London, 1875, vol. III, pp. 831–382.
41. A. J. Bernay, Notes on Analytical Chemistry for Students of Medicine, Churchill, London, 1889, pp. 68–69.
42. D. T. Burns, A. Townshend and A. G. Catchpole, Inorganic Reaction Chemistry: Systematic Chemical Separation, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1981, pp. 187 and 188.
43. ref. 42, p. 19.
44. J. Woodward, ‘Praeperatio caerulii prussiaci ex germaniâ, Philos. Trans., 1724, 33, 15.
45. J. Brown, ‘Observations and experiments upon the foregoing preparation’, Philos. Trans., 1724, 33, 17.
46. P. J. Macquer, A Dictionary of Chemistry, T. Cadell and P. Elmsly, London, 1771, vol. 1, pp. 125–126.
47. ref. 46, p. 332.
48. S. A. Marggraf, in Opuscules Chymiques, a French translation of Marggraf's work, by Formey, Paris, 1712, vol. 2, p. 57.
49. ref. 48, p. 63.
50. T. Bergman, ‘De analysi aquarum’, in Opuscula Physica et Chemica, Holmiae, Upsaliae and Aboae, 1779, vol. 1, p. 68.
51. F. Szabadvary, History of Analytical Chemistry, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1977, p. 49.
52. T. J. Herapath, Qu. J. Chem., 1852, 5, 27 and J. Prakt. Chem., 1852, 56, 255.