Determination of dimetridazole, ronidazole and their common metabolite in poultry muscle and eggs by high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection and confirmatory analysis by atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry†‡

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Martin J. Sams, Paul R. Strutt, Karen A. Barnes, Andrew P. Damant and Martin D. Rose


Abstract

A method was developed for the determination of the nitroimidazole compounds dimetridazole (DMZ) and ronidazole (RNZ) and their common metabolite, 2-hydroxymethyl-1-methyl-5-nitroimidazole (2-OH-M). Extracts obtained from a clean-up process using strong cation exchange (SCX) solid phase extraction (SPE) can be analysed either by high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection (HPLC-UV) or by high performance liquid chromatography with atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry (HPLC-APCI-MS) as a confirmatory method. Up to 20 samples can be extracted in approximately 4 h. The HPLC-UV analysis had a limit of detection of 0.5 µg kg–1. Validation in chicken muscle fortified at a concentration of 5 µg kg–1 gave recoveries of 75% DMZ, 77% RNZ and 81% 2-OH-M with RSDs of 16.4, 11.3 and 14.0%, respectively (n = 17). Validation in egg fortified at the same concentration gave recoveries of 77% DMZ, 80% RNZ and 80% 2-OH-M, with RSDs of 14.9, 22.0 and 18.2%, respectively (n = 18). The limit of detection of the HPLC-APCI-MS method was 0.1µg kg–1 for DMZ and RNZ and 0.5 µg kg–1 for 2-OH-M. This method gave mean recoveries in fortified egg samples of 65% DMZ, 87% RNZ and 75% 2-OH-M with RSDs of 22, 11 and 14%, respectively (n = 10). The ratios of the peak areas of the molecular ion and a fragment ion were monitored as added confirmation of the presence of the analyte. Both the HPLC-UV screening procedure and the HPLC-APCI-MS confirmatory method have subsequently been used for the analysis of several hundred samples as part of UK surveillance programmes.


References

  1. Council Regulation 2377/90, 26 June, 1990, Off. J. Eur. Commun., 1990, No. L224, 1 Search PubMed.
  2. Commision Regulation 675/92, 18 March 1992, Off. J. Eur. Commun., 1992, No. L73, 8 Search PubMed.
  3. Commision Regulation 3426/93, 14 December 1993, Off. J. Eur. Commun., 1993, No. L312, 15 Search PubMed.
  4. Commision Regulation 1798/95, 25 July 1995. Off. J. Eur. Commun., 1995, No. L174, 20 Search PubMed.
  5. Council Directive 70/524/EEC, 23 November 1970, Off. J. Eur. Commun., 1970, No. L270, 1 Search PubMed.
  6. G. L. Law, G. P. Mansfield, D. F. Muggleton and E. W. Parnell, Nature (London), 1963, 197, 1024 CAS.
  7. C. Rosenblum, N. R. Trenner, R. P. Buhs, C. B. Hiremath, F. R. Koniusky and D. E. Wolf, J. Agric. Food Chem., 1972, 20, 360 CrossRef CAS.
  8. R. M. Aerts, I. M. Egberink, C. A. Kan, H. J. Keukens and W. M. J. Beek, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1991, 74, 46 Search PubMed.
  9. H. J. Keukens, M. C. Elema, W. M. J. Beek and A. Boekestein, in Proceedings of the Euroresidue II Conference on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Food, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, May 3–5, 1993, ed. N. Haagsma, A. Ruiter and P. B. Czedik-Eysenberg, University of Utrecht, Faculty of Medicine, 1993, p. 8410 Search PubMed.
  10. A. Cannavan and D. G. Kennedy, Analyst, 1997, 122, 963 RSC.
  11. G. Stubbings, in preparation.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.