GC-MS determination of anabolic steroids after multi-immunoaffinity purification†

Abstract

For many years, EC regulations have prohibited the use of anabolic agents in food-producing animals. Multiple screening methods have been published, but some lack specificity and some are difficult to apply when screening for unknowns in surveillance programmes. This paper presents a new and powerful technique, combining multiresidue immunoaffinity chromatography and GC-MS, for the simultaneous identification and semi-quantification of various anabolic steroids in urine and faeces samples of bovine origin. It should reduce the cost, time and effort of screening by limiting the number of tedious clean-up steps and analyses required. A preliminary extraction step is applied to the individual biological specimens: solid-phase extraction followed by enzymatic digestion in the case of urine samples and a single liquid extraction step for faeces. This step is followed by a first clean-up step involving both a solid-phase column and a rapid RP-HPLC separation. The individual biological fractions (urine or faeces) are further purified on a multiresidue immunoaffinity chromatographic gel (MIAC-steroids-CER) so as to decrease interferences due mainly to background signals. A final trimethylsilyl derivatization is followed by the analysis of the biological samples by a sensitive and specific GC-MS procedure.

References

1. EEC Directive 88/146, Off. J. Eur. Commun., 1988, No. L 70, 16.
2. H. F. De Brabander, F. Smets and G. Pottie, J. Planar Chromatogr. Mod. TLC, 1988, 1, 369.
3. H. F. De Brabander, L. Hendriks, F. Smets, P. Delahaut, P. Batjoens, L. Leyssens and G. Pottie, in Proceedings of the EuroResidue II Conference on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Food, Veldhoven, The Netherlands, May 3–5, 1993, ed. N. Haagsma, A. Ruiter and P. B. Czedik-Eysenberg, University of Utrecht, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht, 1993, p. 211.
4. E. A. I. Daeseleire, A. De Guesquière and C. H. Van Peteghem, J. Chromatogr. Sci., 1992, 30, 409.
5. L. G. M. Th. Tuinstra, W. A. Traag, H. J. Keukens and R. J. Van Mazijk, J. Chromatogr., 1983, 279, 533.
6. L. A. Van Ginkel, J. Chromatogr., 1991, 564, 363.
7. L. A. Van Ginkel, R. W. Stephany, H. J. Van Rossum, H. M. Steinbach, E. Van Der Heeft and A. Jong, J. Chromatogr., 1989, 489, 111.
8. W. Schänzer, P. Delahaut, E. Völker and M. Donike, in 10th Cologne Workshop on Dope Analysis, June 7–12, 1993—Proceedings, ed. M. Donike, H. Geyer, U. Gotzmann, U. Mareck-Engelke and S. Rauth, Sport und Buch Strauss, Cologne, 1993, p. 307.
9. M. Machnik, P. Delahaut, S. Horning and W. Schänzer, in 10th Cologne Workshop on Dope Analysis, June 7–12, 1993—Proceedings, ed. M. Donike, H. Geyer, U. Grotzmann, U. Mareck-Engelke and S. Rauth, Sport und Buch Strauss, Cologne, 1996, p. 223.
10. P. Delahaut, P. Jacquemin, Y. Colemonts, M. Dubois, J. De Graeve and H. Deluyker, J. Chromatogr., 1997, 696, 203.
11. B. F. Erlanger, F. Boerek, S. M. Beisder and S. Liberman, J. Biol. Chem., 1957, 228, 713.
12. Commission Decision 93/256/EEC of 14 April 1993, Off. J. Eur. Commun., 1993, No. L118, 64.