Immunochemical screening for antimicrobial drug residues in commercial honey†

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Werner Heering, Ewald Usleber, Richard Dietrich and Erwin Märtlbauer


Abstract

Honey samples (n = 100; origin: various countries from Eurasia, Oceania, and the Americas) were analysed by enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for tetracyclines, streptomycin, and sulfathiazole. Considering antibody specificity, these EIAs are either quantitative (streptomycin) or qualitative (tetracyclines, sulfathiazole) tests. Honey extract purification was achieved by liquid–liquid partition (tetracyclines), and by solid phase extraction–immunoaffinity chromatography (streptomycin, sulfathiazole). Detection limits were 20 µg kg-1 (tetracycline equivalents), 10 µg kg–1 (streptomycin), and 50 µg kg–1 (sulfathiazole equivalents), with mean recoveries of 100–117%. A total of 42% of the samples was found positive by EIA; 25% were positive in one assay, 13% in two, and 3% were positive in all three tests. In the EIA for tetracyclines, 26% were positive, with 12 samples exceeding a level of 50 µg kg–1 (tetracycline equivalents). In the EIA for streptomycin, 19% were positive, with a mean concentration of 19 ± 12 µg kg–1. In the sulfathiazole EIA, 16% of the samples were positive, with 13 samples exceeding a level of 100 µg kg–1 (sulfathiazole equivalents). However, when samples which were positive in the sulfathiazole EIA were reanalysed for sulfonamides by HPLC, no sulfa drugs could be detected. Experimental heating (40 °C) of honey spiked with sulfathiazole indicated that the sulfa drug(s) responsible for positive EIA results could be present as sugar derivatives.


References

  1. K. Weiss, Bienen-Pathologie, Ehrenwirth Verlag, München, 1990 Search PubMed.
  2. N. H. Low, J. L. Standish and P. Sporns, Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J., 1989, 22, 212 Search PubMed and references cited therein.
  3. H. B. Sheth, V. A. Yaylayan, N. H. Low, M. E. Stiles and P. Sporns, J. Agric. Food Chem., 1990, 38, 1125 CrossRef CAS and references cited therein.
  4. P. S. McManus and A. L. Jones, Phytopathol., 1994, 84, 627 Search PubMed.
  5. K. Richter, Forschungsreport Ernährung-Landwirtschaft-Forsten, 1994, 9, 8 Search PubMed.
  6. R. A. Spotts and L. A. Cervantes, Plant Disease, 1995, 79, 1132 Search PubMed.
  7. E. Usleber, R. Dietrich, E. Märtlbauer and W. Unglaub, in Euroresidue III: Conference on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods, ed. N. Haagsma and A. Ruiter, University of Utrecht, 1996, pp. 948-952 Search PubMed.
  8. E. Usleber, R. Dietrich, E. Märtlbauer and W. Unglaub, Arch. Lebensmittelhyg., 1995, 46, 94 Search PubMed.
  9. U. Kocher, Lebensmittelchemie, 1996, 50, 115 Search PubMed.
  10. Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2377/90, 1990. Off. J. Eur. Commun. L 224, 1 Search PubMed.
  11. German Food Law 1995. Rückstands-Höchstmengenverordnung. BGBl. 1, p. 504 Search PubMed.
  12. V. W. Bentler and E. Frese, Arch. Lebensmittelhyg., 1981, 32, 130 Search PubMed.
  13. L. A. Roth, S. Kwan and P. Sporns, J. Food Prot., 1986, 49, 436 Search PubMed.
  14. U. Jürgens, Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 1981, 173, 356.
  15. P. Sporns, S. Kwan and L. A. Roth, J. Food Prot., 1986, 49, 383 Search PubMed.
  16. H. Oka, Y. Ikai, N. Kawamura, K. Uno, M. Yamada, K. Harada, M. Uchiyama, H. Asukabe, Y. Mori and M. Suzuki, J. Chromatogr., 1987, 389, 417 CrossRef CAS.
  17. H. Oka, Y. Ikai, J. Hayakawa, K.-I. Harada, H. Asukabe, M. Suzuki, R. Himei, M. Horie, H. Nakazawa and J. D. MacNeil, J. Agric. Food Chem., 1994, 42, 2215 CrossRef CAS.
  18. U. Jürgens, Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch., 1982, 174, 208.
  19. C. P. Barry and G. M. MacEachern, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1983, 66, 4 Search PubMed.
  20. E. Neidert, Z. Baraniak and A. Sauvé, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1986, 69, 641 Search PubMed.
  21. D. P. Schwartz and J. Sherma, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1986, 69, 72 Search PubMed.
  22. J. Sherma, W. Bretschneider, M. Dittamo, N. DiBiase, D. Huh and D. Schwartz, J. Chromatogr., 1989, 463, 229 CrossRef CAS.
  23. T. G. Diaz, A. G. Cabanillas and F. Salinas, Anal. Lett., 1990, 23, 607.
  24. M. Horie, K. Saito, N. Nose and H. Nakazawa, J. AOAC Int., 1992, 75, 786 Search PubMed.
  25. W. Unglaub, S. Martini and F. Neumann, Dt. Bienen. J., 1995, 3, 605 Search PubMed.
  26. A. Mascher, S. Lavagnoli and M. Curatolo, Apidologie, 1996, 27, 229 Search PubMed.
  27. E. Usleber, R. Dietrich, E. Märtlbauer and W. Unglaub, in Immunoassays for Residue Analysis: Food Safety, ed. R. C. Beier and L. H. Stanker, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1996, ACS Symposium Series 621, pp. 74-81 Search PubMed.
  28. H. B. Sheth and P. Sporns, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1990, 73, 871 Search PubMed.
  29. C. A. Thomson and P. Sporns, J. Food Sci., 1995, 60, 409 CAS.
  30. B. Lang, E. Märtlbauer and G. Terplan, Arch. Lebensmittelhyg., 1992, 43, 77 Search PubMed.
  31. E. Märtlbauer, R. Meier, E. Usleber and G. Terplan, Food Agric. Immunol., 1992, 4, 219.
  32. P. Schnappinger, E. Usleber, E. Märtlbauer and G. Terplan, Food Agric. Immunol., 1993, 5, 67 CrossRef CAS.
  33. E. Märtlbauer, R. Dietrich and E. Usleber, in Veterinary Drug Residues: Food Safety, ed. W. A. Moats and M. B. Medina, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1996, ACS Symposium Series 636, pp. 121-131 Search PubMed.
  34. E. Märtlbauer, Enzymimmuntests für antimikrobiell wirksame Stoffe, Ferdinand Enke Verlag, Stuttgart, 1993 Search PubMed.
  35. German Food Law. Nachweismethoden für Rückstände in Tierarzneimitteln: Bestimmung von Sulfonamiden in Milch-Hochdruckflüssigkeitschromatographische Bestimmung (Routineverfahren). Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren nach§35 LMBG, in the press Search PubMed.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.