Use of biosensors for rapid drug residue analysis without sample deconjugation or clean-up: a possible way forward†

Abstract

The drug salbutamol (SBL) is a β-agonist that may be used illegally as an animal growth promoter. SBL is also a good example of a drug which is excreted in the form of glucuronides and sulfates. Such metabolites cause complexities in analysing for the presence of drug residues. In the majority of cases a process of deconjugation and sample clean-up is required prior to analysis. This is both time consuming and causes some loss of accuracy. In this study, the urine of calves treated with SBL orally for 3 d was collected during and after medication. Samples were assayed before and after hydrolysis by two different methods, radioimmunoassay (RIA) and a newly developed biosensor immunoassay (BIA). Some samples were also analysed by GC-MS. The results clearly showed that both screening assays (RIA and BIA) found high concentrations of SBL residues throughout the study. This was especially true in the BIA method. It was also demonstrated that urine sample analysis without the need for deconjugation or clean-up could be achieved. Results obtained by GC-MS tended to be an order of magnitude lower than the corresponding screening test results. This work showed that biosensor based veterinary drug residue testing procedures can be developed which can generate results in real time without the need for time consuming sample preparation.

References

1. H. A. Kuiper, M. Y. Noordam, M. M. H. van Dooren-Flipsen, R. Schilt and A. H. Roos, J. Anim. Sci., 1998, 76, 195.
2. C. T. Elliott, H. D. Shortt, D. G. Kennedy and W. J. McCaughey, Vet. Qy., 1996, 8, 41.
3. M. E. Ploum, W. Haasnoot, R. J. A. Paulussen, G. D. van Bruchem, A. R. M. Hamers, R. Schilt and F. A. Huf, J. Chromatogr. Biomed. Appl., 1991, 3, 297.
4. Å. Sternesjö, C. Mellgren and L. Björck, in Immunoassays for Residue Analysis: Food Safety, ed. R. C. Beier and L. H. Stanker, ACS Symposium Series, No. 621, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 463–470.
5. C. Mellgren, Å. Sternesjö, P. Hammer, G. Suhren, L. Björck and W. Heeschen, J. Food Protect., 1996, 59, 1223.
6. C. Mellgren and Å. Sternesjö, J. AOAC Int., 1998, 81, 394.
7. C. T. Elliott, G. A. Baxter, S. R. H. Crooks and W. J. McCaughey, Food Agric. Immunol., in press.
8. S. R. H. Crooks, G. A. Baxter, M. C. O'Connor and C. T. Elliott, Analyst, 1998, 123, 2755.
9. K.-E. Hellenäs, A. M. Johannson and C. T. Elliott, in Euroresidue III. Proceedings of Conference on Residues of Veterinary Drugs In Food, ed. N. Haagsma and A. Ruiter, Cip. Gegevens, Den Haag, 1966, pp. 486–490.
10. K.-E. Hellenäs, unpublished data.
11. R. F. Witcamp, in Proceedings of Scientific Conference on Growth Promoters in Meat Production, Brussels, 29th November–1st December 1995, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1996, pp. 297–315.
12. T. L. Fodey, S. R. H. Crooks, C. T. Elliott and W. J. McCaughey, Analyst, 1996, 122, 159.
13. W. Haasnoot, G. Cazemier, P. Stouten and A. Kemmers-Voncken, in Immunoassay for Residue Analysis: Food Safety, ed. R. C. Beier and L. H. Stanker, ACS ymposium Series No. 621, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1996, pp. 60–73.