Application of an androgen receptor assay for the characterisation of the androgenic or antiandrogenic activity of various phenylurea herbicides and their derivatives†

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Ellinor R. S. Bauer, Heinrich H. D. Meyer, Helga Sauerwein and Petra Stahlschmidt-Allner


Abstract

The potency of different substances for [3H]dihydrotestosterone ([3H]DHT) displacement from the bovine androgen receptor was tested. The phenylurea herbicide linuron and its derivative 3,4-dichloroaniline (3,4-DCA), which are found in sediments and surface waters, are known to displace bound testosterone from the rat androgen receptor. Because 3,4-DCA is rapidly taken up by fish and metabolised into 3,4-dichloroacetanilide (3,4-DCAc), it was investigated whether the displacement effects are attributable to 3,4-DCA or to 3,4-DCAc. The potency of 3,4-DCAc androgen receptor binding was compared with that of several phenylurea compounds. In a radioreceptor assay with calf uterus cytosol as androgen receptor preparation, the specific binding of [3H]DHT, the endogenous ligand, was completely displaceable by increasing concentrations of 3,4-DCAc. The relative binding affinities (RBA) of the various compounds were about 1/104 to 1/105 of that of DHT. 3,4-DCAc had the relative highest affinity (1.31 × 10–4), followed by linuron, 3,4-dichlorophenylurea, flutamide, 3,4-DCA and diuron with the lowest RBA (2.4 × 10–5). Hence the metabolism of xenobiotic compounds has to be considered to estimate potential ecotoxiocological effects. This test not only can be used to screen for androgen- and antiandrogen-like substances in environmentally relevant samples such as surface waters, but might also be applied for drug testing and for residue monitoring.


References

  1. J. Toppari, J. C. Larsen, P. Christiansen, A. Giwercman, P. Grandjean, L. J. Guillette, B. Jégou, T. K. Jensen, P. Jouannet, N. Keiding, H. Leffers, J. A. McLachlan, O. Meyer, J. Müller, E. Rajpert-De Meyts, T. Scheike, R. Sharpe, J. Sumpter and N. E. Skakkebæk, Environ. Health. Perspect., 1996, 104, 741 CAS.
  2. M. Gülden, A. Turan and H. Seibert, Umweltbundsamt, Texte, UBAFB 97-068, ISSN 0722-186X, Substanzen mit endokriner Wirkung in Oberflächengewässern 1997, 46.
  3. J. C. Cook, L. S. Mullin, S. R. Frame and L. B. Biegel, Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 1993, 119, 195 CrossRef CAS.
  4. M. A. El-Dib and O. A. Aly, Water Res., 1976, 10, 1055 CrossRef CAS.
  5. M. A. Valtentovic, T. Yahia, J. G. Ball, S. K. Hong, P. I. Brown and G. O. Rankin, Toxicology, 1997, 124, 125 CrossRef.
  6. A. Grote, B. Hamburger, R. Kanne and M. Olivier, Wasser, 1983, 60, 191 Search PubMed.
  7. P. Stahlschmidt-Allner, B. Allner, J. Römbke and T. Knacker, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 1997, 4, 155 Search PubMed.
  8. J. Simard, I. Luthy, J. Guay, A. Bélanger and F. Fabrie, Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 1986, 44, 261 CrossRef CAS.
  9. H. Sauerwein and H. H. D. Meyer, J. Anim. Sci., 1989, 67, 206 Search PubMed.
  10. Y. Cheng and W. H. Prusoff, Biochem. Pharmacol., 1973, 22, 3099 CrossRef CAS.
  11. K. Jewgenow and H. H. D. Meyer, Gen. Comp. Endocrinol., 1998, 110, 118 CrossRef CAS.
  12. C. Skark and N. Zullei-Seibert, Wasser, 1994, 82, 91 Search PubMed.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.