Immunobiosensor—an alternative to enzyme immunoassay screening for residues of two sulfonamides in pigs†

(Note: The full text of this document is currently only available in the PDF Version )

Steven R. H. Crooks, G. Andrew Baxter, Mary C. O’Connor and Christopher T. Elliot


Abstract

A rapid immunoassay using an optical biosensor (BIAcore) for determining the presence of sulfamethazine (SMT) residues in pig bile was developed. The assay was used in a routine screening laboratory alongside a previously described biosensor method for sulfadiazine (SDZ). Sulfonamide bile concentrations, determined by enzyme immunoassay (EIA), have already been shown suitable for use in predicting the extent of sulfonamide accumulation in kidney. The ability of immunobiosensor based bile screening to predict violative tissue residues (greater than the maximum residue limit; MRL) was compared with results achieved using two conventional EIAs for two of these drug residues (SMT and SDZ). Analysis of 2081 samples for both sulphonamide residues, over an 8 month period, showed the false positive prediction rate of biosensor analysis to be 0.14% and 0.34% for SMT and SDZ, respectively, compared with false positive rates of 1.54% and 1.44% by EIA. Biosensor analysis showed no false negative predictions for either SMT or SDZ while EIA showed a false negative prediction rate of 0.14% for SMT and 0.24% for SDZ. The present study has clearly demonstrated that immunobiosensor assays can be developed for veterinary drug residue screening programmes. These methods have the potential for generating faster and more reliable results than conventional immunoassay methods.


References

  1. P. W. Saschenbrecher and N. A. Fish, Can. J. Compar. Med., 1980, 44, 338 Search PubMed.
  2. C. D. Van Houweling, J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 1981, 178, 1348 Search PubMed.
  3. R. F. Bevill, J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 1984, 185, 1124 Search PubMed.
  4. D. P. Schwartz, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1985, 68, 214 Search PubMed.
  5. Anabolic, Anthelmintic and Antimicrobial Agents, Food Surveillance Paper No. 22, HM Stationery Office, London, 1987, 19–20 Search PubMed.
  6. D. Guggisberg, A. E. Mooser and H. Koch, J. Chromatog., 1992, 624, 425 CrossRef CAS.
  7. V. W. Randecker, J. A. Reagan, R. E. Engel, D. L. Soderberg and J. E. McNeal, J. Food Prot., 1987, 50, 115 Search PubMed.
  8. T. L. Fodey, S. R. H. Crooks, C. T. Elliott and W. J. McCaughey, Analyst, 1997, 122, 165 RSC.
  9. A. Sternesjo, C. Mellgren and L. Bjorck, Anal. Biochem., 1995, 226, 175 CrossRef CAS.
  10. C. T. Elliott, G. A. Baxter, S. R. H. Crooks and W. J. McCaughey, Food Agric. Immunol., in the press Search PubMed.
  11. D. Currie, L. Lynas, D. G. Kennedy and W. J. McCaughey, Food Addit. Contam., 1998, 15(6), 651 CAS.
  12. J. R. Fleeker and L. J. Lovett, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1985, 88, 172 Search PubMed.
  13. W. J. McCaughey, C. T. Elliott and S. R. H. Crooks, Food Addit. Contam., 1990, 7, 259 CAS.
  14. Off. J. Eur. Communities., 1993, L118, 68 Search PubMed.
  15. L. V. Bui, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 1993, 76, 967 Search PubMed.
  16. S. R. H. Crooks, I. M. Traynor, C. T. Elliott and W. J. McCaughey, Analyst, 1997, 122, 161 RSC.
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.